Long Island Skin Cancer and Dermatologic Surgery
Smithtown, New York, United States
NCT Number: NCT01998984
This is a randomised, double-blind, parallel groups, vehicle controlled, 8-week phase 2 trial. The objective is to evaluate efficacy of ingenol mebutate gel 0.06 % after once daily treatment for 2, 3 or 4 consecutive days compared to vehicle gel
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Smithtown, New York, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Subjects with 5 to 20 clinically typical, visible and discrete AKs within a contiguous area of approximately 250 cm² sun-damaged skin on either trunk (except chest), or extremities
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: At Week 8
Complete clearance of AKs at Week 8 was defined as a 100% reduction from baseline in number of AKs.
The table presents the mean across 1000 multiple imputations. Missing values for AK count were imputed sequentially from a negative binomial regression model with treatment group, AK counts at the previous visit, and analysis site as covariates and log baseline AK count as offset.
Time frame: At Week 8
The number of clinically visible AK lesions identified in the treatment area was to be recorded at Visit 1(≤14 days prior to Day 1).
The analysis was based on 1000 imputations of actinic keratosis lesion count at Week 8 using a negative binomial regression model with factors treatment and analysis site and with log of baseline actinic keratosis lesion count as offset. The table shows the adjusted percentage reduction from baseline.
Values for the Ingenol 4 days arm were calculated separately based on observed cases. On the basis of the data monitoring committee's recommendation the 4-day active treatment group was closed, and this arm was excluded from statistical models and comparisons in the secondary efficacy analyses.
Time frame: At Week 8
Partial clearance of AKs at Week 8, defined as at least 75% reduction from baseline in number of AKs, was analysed in the same way as the primary response criterion.
The percent reduction at Week 8 from baseline was analyzed using a negative binomial regression for the AK count at Week 8 with treatment group and pooled sites as factors and baseline count as offset variable (using multiple imputations to account for missing values).
The table presents the mean across 1000 multiple imputations. Missing values for AK count were imputed sequentially from a negative binomial regression model with treatment group, AK counts at the previous visit, and analysis site as covariates and log baseline AK count as offset.
LEO Pharma
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06888362
Actinic Keratosis, Keratosis
Uppsala, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT06027619
Actinic Keratosis, Keratosis
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06319794
Actinic Keratosis, Keratosis
Basel, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT00472459
Actinic Keratosis, Basal Cell Carcinoma
Aarhus, Denmark
View Trial Details