Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00413920

Efficacy and Safety of Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium and Cyclosporine in Combination With and Without Steroids, in Adult Renal Transplant Recipients

This study will investigate the efficacy and safety of a steroid avoidance regimen in comparison with steroid treatment in combination with an initially higher dose of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and cyclosporine microemulsion in de novo renal transplant recipients. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive either EC-MPS or steroids in combination with EC-MPS. Patients of both treatment groups will receive monoclonal antibody induction therapy and a perioperative bolus of steroids and cyclosporine.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

C.H.U. La Milétrie

Poitiers, France

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Primary donor kidney transplant
  • Panel reactive antibody (PRA) ≤ 20%

Exclusion criteria

  • Multi-organ transplantation including dual kidneys or previous transplant with any other organ different from kidney
  • Non-heart beating donor or kidney from a non-compatible donor

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Treatment and study plan

Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS)

Drug

An initial dose of 1080 mg EC-MPS was administered immediately before transplantation. Then, during the first 6 weeks post-transplantation, EC-MPS was administered at a dose of 1080 mg twice a day 12 hours apart. From week 7 until the end of the study (month 6), EC-MPS was administered at standard dose of 720 mg twice a day.

Other names: Myfortic

Prednisone

Drug

Oral tablets

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With the Occurrence of Treatment Failures at 6 Months Post-transplantation

    Time frame: 6 months post transplantation

    Treatment failures defined as Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or loss to follow-up. Only BPAR from other biopsies than the protocol defined biopsy at Month 3 are described. Acute rejection: an episode of acute renal dysfunction diagnosed as rejection on the basis of biopsy or clinical observations, treated with anti-rejection medication. BPAR: renal transplant biopsy finding of acute cellular or antibody mediated rejection. Graft loss: allograft will be presumed to be lost on the day the patient starts dialysis and is not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Number of Participants With BPAR, Clinical Acute Rejection (AR) and Treated AR at 6 Months

    Time frame: Month 6

    If a participant experienced several BPAR, only the rejection with highest grade is taken into account. Only events that occurred before study treatment discontinuation are taken into account. Only BPAR from other biopsies than the protocol defined biopsy at Month 3 are described. Acute rejection: an episode of acute renal dysfunction diagnosed as rejection on the basis of biopsy or clinical observations, treated with anti-rejection medication. BPAR: renal transplant biopsy finding of acute cellular or antibody mediated rejection.

  2. Number of Participants With Treatment Failure, BPAR, Clinical Acute Rejection (AR) and Treated AR at 3 Months

    Time frame: Month 3

    A treatment failure is a Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), a graft loss, a death, or a loss to follow-up. Only BPAR from other biopsies than the protocol defined biopsy at Month 3 are described. Acute rejection: an episode of acute renal dysfunction diagnosed as rejection on the basis of biopsy or clinical observations, treated with anti-rejection medication. BPAR: renal transplant biopsy finding of acute cellular or antibody mediated rejection. Graft loss: The allograft will be presumed lost on the day the patient starts dialysis and is not able to subsequently be removed from dialysis.

  3. Number of Participants With Subclinical Histological Rejections

    Time frame: Month 3

    The number of participants with subclinical histological rejections was determined by renal biopsy screening at 3 months in 125 patients, providing adequate samples for 112 biopsies.

  4. Number of Participants With Treatment Failure at 3 Months by Graft Recovery Status

    Time frame: Month 3

    The number of participants with treatment failure defined as a Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR), a graft loss, a death, or a loss to follow-up at 3 months by graft recovery status.

    Delayed graft function is defined as the need for dialysis within the first 7 days post-transplantation, excluding the first post-transplantation day.

    Slow graft function is defined as a serum creatinine value > 250 µmol/L at day 5.

  5. Number of Participants Requiring Steroids in Non-steroid Treatment Group

    Time frame: Months 3 and 6

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicenter Randomized Open Label Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of a Steroid Avoidance Regimen in Comparison to a Treatment With Steroids, in Combination With Enteric-coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS) 2.16 g/d for 6 Weeks and Cyclosporine Microemulsion, in de Novo Adult Renal Transplant Recipients

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2009
First posted
Dec 20, 2006
Registry last updated
Apr 21, 2011

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.