Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05057572

Efficacy and Safety of Carvedilol in Cirrhosis Patients With Uncomplicated Ascites Without High Risk Esophageal Varices

The cumulative risk of refractory ascites is in the order of 20% within five years of the development of ascites. An elevated sinusoidal pressure is essential for the development of ascites, as fluid accumulation does not develop at portal pressure gradient below 8 mm Hg, and rising corrected sinusoidal pressure correlates with decreased 24-hour urinary excretion of sodium.More recently, it has been hypothesised that bacterial translocation associated with portal hypertension in cirrhosis and related pathogen-associated, molecular pattern activated innate immune responses lead to systemic inflammation.This is associated with vasodilatation as well as release of proinflammatory cytokines, reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, contributing to organ dysfunction.This activates sympathetic nervous system stimulating reabsorption of sodium in proximal,distal tubules, loop of Henle and collecting duct as well as the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, leading to sodium absorption from distal tubule and collecting duct.[5]Renal sodium retention and eventual free water clearance due to non-osmoticrelease of arginine-vasopressin and its action on V2 receptor in the collectingduct underlie the fluid retention associated with oedema and ascites in cirrhosis.The lowering of portal pressure using non selective beta blocker has also been shown to reduce the development of ascites, refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome.Furthermore, the effect of non slective beta blocker on intestinal permeability, bacterial translocation and inflammatory response has been proposed to mitigate the risk of developing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences

New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110070, India

About this study

AIM-To compare the safety and efficacy of addition of carvedilol to SMT (diuretics +/- albumin) compared to SMT alone in the prevention of complicated ascites (refractory ascites, AKI-HRS, SBP or severe hyponatremia) at 1year.

Methodology:

Study population: Patient of liver cirrhosis presenting with uncomplicated ascites and without high risk esophageal varices.

Study design:

  • A prospective, randomized, single center open label study.
  • The study will be conducted on the consecutive patients presenting with uncomplicated ascites and low risk esophageal varices seen at the outpatient clinics/wards of Department of Hepatology, ILBS, New Delhi from July 2021 to June 2023.

Study period: 2years from the date of ethics approval

Sample size with justification:

  • Assuming that the complication rate in carvedilol group is 8% and placebo 30% so the complication free rate of 92% and 70 % further assuming alpha -5%, power 80%.
  • Investigator need to enrol 108 cases in two groups further with 10% drop out rate it was decided to enroll 120 cases
  • Randomisation into two groups by block randomisation method,taking block size 8

Intervention:

  • Patients will be randomized into two Arms A & B.
  • Arm A will receive carvedilol plus standard medical therpy,Carvedilol: will be started with initial dose of 3.125 mg BD then After 3 days, increase the dose to 6.25 mg BD, Maximum dose would be 12.5 mg BD, the same shall be switch to Maximum tollrated dose if SBP >90, HR >55.
  • Arm B will receive standard medical therapy.SMT (as described) that is
  • Grade II ascites - Lasilactone (20/50) OD then Change after 1 week as per response, monitor diuretic intolerance.
  • Grade III ascites will undergo large volume paracentesis, lasilactone (20/50) OD Both groups will receive albumin as indicated (LT references as per protocol will be send for eligible patients)
  • For Diuretic intolerance -Na, K, urea, creatnine will be monitred first weekly then once monthly then SOS as per need
  • For Carvedilol heart rate will be monitored first weekly then monthly then SOS as per need
  • Dose of carvedilol will be adjusted as per protocol.
  • Other treatments given: Alumbin infusion to both group, lasilactone.
  • Complications / Organ failures (3m, 6m, 1y or detected during tele/online consult or on opd basis
  • Data to be collected
  • Baseline -
  • Blood : KFT, LFT, CBC, INR, IL-6, CRP,TNF Alpha
  • Imaging : USG upper abdomen and doppler for renal blood flow,
  • 2D ECHO
  • Urine : Urine R/E, Urine Na,AFP
  • A/F analysis - for SBP
  • HVPG, UGIE
  • At 3 months, 6 months.
  • Blood : LFT, KFT, INR,AFP
  • At 1 year
  • Blood : KFT, LFT, CBC, INR, TNF alpha,IL-6, CRP,AFP
  • Imaging : USG upper abdomen
  • Urine : Urine Na
  • HVPG, UGIE

Statistical Analysis:

Data will be reported as mean + SD. Categorical variables will be compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Normal continuous variables will be compared using the Student's t testNon normal continuous variables will be compared using the Mann Whitney rank-sum test (unpaired data) or the Wilcoxon test (paired data). The actuarial probability of survival will be calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.A Cox regression analysis will be performed to identify independent prognostic factors for survival.Univariate and multivariate analysis will be used whenever applicable.

Adverse effects:

Hypotension (2.6-17.6%) with minor side effets as fainting, shortness of breath, weight gain, swelling of the arms, hands, feet, ankles, or lower legs, chest pain, slow or irregular heartbeat, rash, itching, difficulty breathing and swallowing tiredness, weakness, lightheadedness, dizziness, headache, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, vision change, joint pain difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep, cough dry eyes, numbness, burning, or tingling in the arms or legs.

Stopping rule of study:

  • Severe complications requiring discontinuation of therapy severe Respiratory distress, severe bradycardia heart block not responding to dose reduction.
  • Patient refusal to further participate in study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-65 years
  • Liver cirrhosis
  • Grade II-III high SAAG ascites
  • Small low risk or no esophageal varices
  • CTP 7-12

Exclusion criteria

  • Age <18 years
  • AKI at enrollement (Prior transient volume responsive AKI stage I included)
  • Post renal or liver transplantation
  • History of CAD, PVD, ventricular arrythmia, Bronchial asthma
  • SBP at diagnosis
  • Severe Hyponatremia (Na <125 MEq/L)
  • Grade II/III/IV HE
  • Advanced HCC (BCLC C,D), PVTT, Pregnancy or Lactating mother
  • High risk varices (Large varices or small high risk varices)
  • CTP >12
  • ACLF
  • Mixed / TB ascites
  • Bilirubin >5 mg/dl
  • Known CKD, obstructive uropathy
  • Patient on MV, NIV, systemic sepsis and shock
  • Lack of informed consent
  • Prior intolerance or S/E to carvedilol or diuretics

Treatment and study plan

Carvedilol

Drug
  • Arm A will receive carvedilol plus standard medical therpy,Carvedilol: will be started with initial dose of 3.125 mg BD then After 3 days, increase the dose to 6.25 mg BD, Maximum dose would be 12.5 mg BD, the same shall be switch to Maximum tollrated dose if SBP>90, HR >55.

Standard Medical Treatment

Drug
  • Arm B will receive standard medical therapy.SMT (as described) that is Grade II ascites - Lasilactone (20/50) OD then Change after 1 week as per response, monitor diuretic intolerance.
  • Grade III ascites will undergo large volume paracentesis, lasilactone (20/50) OD Both groups will receive albumin as indicated (LT references as per protocol will be send for eligible patients)

Primary outcomes

  1. Complicated ascites (any of refractory ascites, SBP, AKI-HRS)

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ascites resolution in both groups

    Time frame: 3 Months

    Ascites well controlled with appropriate medical treatment, i.e, the minimum diuretic dose necessary to control weight gain and ascites formation that did not lead to diuretic-induced complications, such as renal impairment, hyponatremia, hypokalemia or hyperkalemia, or HE

  2. Ascites resolution in both groups

    Time frame: 6 Months

    Ascites well controlled with appropriate medical treatment, i.e, the minimum diuretic dose necessary to control weight gain and ascites formation that did not lead to diuretic-induced complications, such as renal impairment, hyponatremia, hypokalemia or hyperkalemia, or HE

  3. Ascites resolution in both groups

    Time frame: 1 year

    Ascites well controlled with appropriate medical treatment, i.e, the minimum diuretic dose necessary to control weight gain and ascites formation that did not lead to diuretic-induced complications, such as renal impairment, hyponatremia, hypokalemia or hyperkalemia, or HE

  4. Need and frequency of Large Volume Paracentesis

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Incidence of PICD in 1 year

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. Mortality

    Time frame: 1 year

  7. Change in grade of varices in both groups

    Time frame: 1 year

    Change is defined as from garde I to garde II/ grade III

  8. Reduction in HVPG in both groups

    Time frame: 1 year

  9. Change in MELD score in both groups

    Time frame: 3 months

    Minimum MELD=6 Maximum MELD=40

  10. Change in MELD score in both groups

    Time frame: 6 months

    Minimum MELD=6 Maximum MELD=40

  11. Change in MELD score in both groups

    Time frame: 1 year

    Minimum MELD=6 Maximum MELD=40

  12. Change in CTP score in both groups

    Time frame: 3 months

    CTP Change is CTP- C to CTP- B & CTP- B to CTP- A

  13. Change in CTP score in both groups

    Time frame: 6 months

    CTP Change is CTP- C to CTP- B & CTP- B to CTP- A

  14. Change in CTP score in both groups

    Time frame: 1 year

    CTP Change is CTP- C to CTP- B & CTP- B to CTP- A

  15. Incidence of HE in both groups

    Time frame: 6 months

  16. Incidence of HE in both groups.

    Time frame: 1 year

  17. Incidence of variceal bleed in both groups

    Time frame: 6 months

  18. Incidence of variceal bleed in both groups

    Time frame: 1 year

  19. Incidence of AKI in both groups

    Time frame: 6 months

  20. Incidence of AKI in both groups

    Time frame: 1 year

  21. Incidence of SBP in both groups

    Time frame: 6 months

  22. Incidence of SBP in both groups

    Time frame: 1 year

  23. Incidence of severe hyponatremia in both groups

    Time frame: 6 months

  24. Incidence of severe hyponatremia in both groups

    Time frame: 1 year

  25. Incidence of refractory ascites in both groups

    Time frame: 6 months

  26. Incidence of refractory ascites in both groups

    Time frame: 1 year

  27. Maximum tolerated dose of carvedilol

    Time frame: 1 year

  28. Tretament (carvedilol) related adverse events and their grades

    Time frame: 1 year

    Adverse Events are defined as incidence of Bradycardia,Hypotension,Breathlessness

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy and Safety of Carvedilol in Cirrhosis Patients With Uncomplicated Ascites Without High Risk Esophageal Varices- A Randomised Controlled Trial"

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Sep 27, 2021
Registry last updated
Mar 20, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.