Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00099268

Efficacy and Safety of Carbidopa/Levodopa/Entacapone in Patients With Parkinson's Disease Requiring Initiation of Levodopa Therapy

The CELC200A2401 study has been designed in order to evaluate the hypothesis that administering the combination carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone at the time that levodopa therapy is initiated results in a decrease in the risk of the development of motor complications for patients with Parkinson's disease.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

30 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Novartis Investigative Site, Innsbruck, Austria

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease
  • Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease for no more than 5 years

Exclusion criteria

  • History, signs, or symptoms of atypical or secondary parkinsonism
  • Presence at baseline of drug-related wearing-off symptoms, dyskinesia or other motor complications
  • Levodopa exposure of more than 30 days or anytime within 8 weeks prior to visit 1

Other inclusion/exclusion criteria applied to this study.

Treatment and study plan

Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone

Drug

Carbidopa/Levodopa/Entacapone 12.5/50/200 mg and 25/100/200 mg capsules.

Other names: Stalevo

Immediate release carbidopa/levodopa

Drug

Immediate release carbidopa/levodopa 12.5/50 mg and 25/100 mg capsules.

Other names: Sinemet

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to First Occurrence of Dyskinesia

    Time frame: Treatment duration for an individual patient varied between a minimum of 134 weeks for those patients recruited last and a maximum of 208 weeks for those patients recruited first

    Dyskinesia was assessed by a blinded rater at each visit. Time to dyskinesia was defined as the visit at which the rater first answered "yes" to the following question: "In your opinion, does this patient have dyskinesia?" Time to dyskinesia was estimated by Kaplan-Meier product limit estimate that takes into consideration patients who did not experience dyskinesia by censoring them at the end of the study.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score (Parts II and III)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6 and Week 130

    The UPDRS is a standardized assessment scale used to measure the patient's disease state. It was to be completed by a blinded rater. There are 6 parts to the UPDRS. Part II (items 5-17; total score 0-52 units on the scale) measures the patient's activities of daily living and part III (items 18-31; total score 0-56 units on the scale) measures the motor function of the patient. The total score ranges from 0 to 108 units on the scale. A higher score indicates greater disability. A negative change score indicates improvement.

  2. Occurrence of Wearing-off

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 134

    Wearing-off is defined as a perception of loss of mobility or dexterity, usually taking place gradually over minutes (up to an hour) and usually bearing a close temporal relationship to the timing of anti-parkinsonian medications; it does not include early-morning akinesia. To ascertain its occurrence, a blinded rater questioned the patient as to whether he/she had noticed that the benefits of the study drug were wearing-off.

  3. Time to First Occurrence of Wearing-off

    Time frame: Baseline to end of study (134-208 weeks of treatment)

    Wearing off is defined as a perception of loss of mobility or dexterity, usually taking place gradually over minutes (up to an hour) and usually bearing a close temporal relationship to the timing of anti-parkinsonian medications; it does not include early-morning akinesia. To ascertain its occurrence, a blinded rater questioned the patient whether he/she had noticed that the benefits of the study drug wear-off. A motor complications and patient questionnaire card were provided to assist the blinded rater in determining whether a patient had experienced wearing-off.

  4. Occurrence of Dyskinesia

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 208

    Dyskinesia was assessed by a blinded rater at each visit. Time to dyskinesia was defined as the visit at which the rater first answered "yes" to the following question: "In your opinion, does this patient have dyskinesia?"

  5. Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life Assessed Using the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 156

    The PDQ-39 instrument is used to assess quality of life in individuals with Parkinson's disease. The questionnaire provides scores on eight scales: Mobility, activities of daily living, emotions, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The total score can range from 39 to 190. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates an improvement.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Collaborators

  • Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma

Registry information

Official study title

A Long Term, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel-group, Carbidopa/Levodopa Controlled, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Effect of Carbidopa/Levodopa/Entacapone in Patients With Parkinson's Disease Requiring Initiation of Levodopa Therapy

Acronym: STRIDE-PD

Important dates

Study start
2004
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2008
First posted
Dec 10, 2004
Registry last updated
Apr 23, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.