Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03917472

Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab vs Aflibercept in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab vs. aflibercept in the treatment of patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema (DME).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Diabetic Macular Edema Cardiovascular Diseases Diabetes Complications Diabetes Mellitus Diabetic Angiopathies Diabetic Retinopathy Endocrine System Diseases Eye Diseases Macular Degeneration Macular Edema Retinal Degeneration Retinal Diseases Vascular Diseases

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Novartis Investigative Site, Pécs, Baranya, Hungary

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This study was designed as a Phase III, multi-center, randomized, double-masked, active controlled, parallel group prospective study to evaluate if brolucizumab 6 mg dosed q4w is safe and effective in the treatment of subjects with visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema (DME). Subjects who met all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to one of two treatment arms i.e., brolucizumab 6 mg and aflibercept 2 mg. Only one eye was selected as study eye and treated with study medication.

The study included a screening period of up to 2 weeks to assess eligibility, followed by a double-masked treatment period (Day 1 to Week 48). For all subjects, the last study assessment was performed at the Week 52/end of study (EOS) visit. All subjects had study visits q4w through Week 52. The primary analysis was performed at the EOS visit (Week 52).

To ensure masking was maintained, the investigational site had both masked and unmasked staff to perform the masked and unmasked study assessments/procedures accordingly.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed informed consent must be obtained prior to participation in the study.
  • Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≤ 12% at screening.
  • Study eye: Visual impairment due to DME with:
  • Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) score between 73 and 23 letters, inclusive, using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters
  • DME involving the center of the macula, with Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) ≥ 320 µm on Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)

Exclusion criteria

  • High-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in the study eye
  • Concomitant conditions or ocular disorders in the study eye which confound interpretation of study results, compromise visual acuity or require medical or surgical intervention
  • Any active intraocular or periocular infection or active intraocular inflammation in the either eye
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye
  • Presence of amblyopia, amaurosis or ocular disorders in the fellow eye with BCVA <20/200
  • Use of anti-VEGF therapies, intraocular surgery or laser photocoagulation (macular or panretinal) in the study eye during the 3-month period prior to baseline
  • Use of intraocular or periocular corticosteroids in the study eye during the 6-month period prior to baseline, and use of fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal (IVT) implant (Iluvien) at any time prior to baseline
  • Prior investigational drugs in either eye, vitreoretinal surgery in the study eye at any time prior to baseline

Treatment and study plan

Brolucizumab

Drug

Intravitreal injection

Other names: RTH258, ESBA1008

aflibercept

Drug

Intravitreal injection

Other names: Eylea

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

    BCVA will be assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts.

    Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of 73 to 23 (per the inclusion criteria) (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye were included.

    Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning.

    Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for the imputation of missing values.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) at Each Post-baseline Visit

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52

    Central Subfield Thickness assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center.

  2. Number and Percentage of Participants With Fluid-free Macula in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52

    Subretinal Fluid (SRF) and Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) status in the central subfield: proportion of subjects with simultaneous absence of SRF and IRF in the study eye by visit. Events and censoring after 52 weeks are included in week 52 row.

  3. Number and Percentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) (CSFT < 280 μm) at Each Post-baseline Visit for the Study Eye

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52

    Central Subfield Thickness Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center.

  4. Time to First Fluid-free Macula - Time-to-first Absence of Subretinal Fluid (SRF) and Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) in the Study Eye - Number of Subjects With Absence of SRF / IRF and Number of Subjects Censored by Visit

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52

    Central Subfield Thickness Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. Fluid status assessments after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored. Time to first fluid-free macula analysis is based on the subset of subjects with fluid present at baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. Time (week) was calculated by (study day / 7). Events and censoring after 52 weeks were included in week 52 row.

  5. Time to First Fluid-free Macula - Time-to-first Absence of Subretinal Fluid (SRF) and Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) in the Study Eye - Kaplan-Meier Analysis - Probability of Absence of SRF/IRF by Visit

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52

    Central Subfield Thickness Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. Fluid status assessments after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored. Time to first fluid-free macula analysis is based on the subset of subjects with fluid present at baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment. Time (week) was calculated by (study day / 7). Events and censoring after 52 weeks were included in week 52 row.

  6. Time to First Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) (CSFT < 280 μm) in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit - Number of Subjects With Probability of Absence of DME and Number Censored by Visit

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52

    Central Subfield Thickness Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. CSFT assessments after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored. Time to first absence of DME based on subjects with valid baseline and at least one post-baseline CSFT assessment. Time (week) was calculated by (study day / 7). Events and censoring after 52 weeks were included in week 52 row.

  7. Time to First Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) (CSFT < 280 μm) in the Study Eye at Each Post-baseline Visit - Kaplan-Meier Analysis - Probability of Absence of DME by Visit

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52

    Central Subfield Thickness Assessed by Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) from the central reading center. CSFT assessments after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored. Time to first absence of DME based on subjects with valid baseline and at least one post-baseline CSFT assessment. Time (week) was calculated by (study day / 7). Events and censoring after 52 weeks were included in week 52 row.

  8. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (Letters Read): Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Each Post-baseline Visit for the Study Eye

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48 and 52

    BCVA will be assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts.

    Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of 73 to 23 (per the inclusion criteria) (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye were included.

    Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning.

  9. Gain in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (Letters Read): Number (%) of Subjects Who Gained ≥ 5, 10, or 15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Reached BCVA ≥ 84 Letters in the Study Eye at Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

    BCVA will be assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts.

    Visual function of the study eye was assessed using the ETDRS protocol. Participants with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of 73 to 23 (per the inclusion criteria) (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye were included.

    Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better functioning.

  10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Proportion of Subjects With >=2-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 52

    The Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale measures the 5 levels of diabetic retinopathy - none, mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative.

    Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment".

    A lower score represents better functioning.

    Subjects who had full/partial panretinal photocoagulation or local photocoagulation for new vessel (DRSS score 60) at any visit were excluded.

    DRSS scores after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored and replaced by the last value prior to start of this alternative treatment.

  11. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Proportion of Subjects With >=3-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24 and 52

    The Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale measures the 5 levels of diabetic retinopathy - none, mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative.

    Severity of Diabetic retinopathy was evaluated using the ETDRS DRSS score assessed by the Central Reading Center based on color fundus photography images in the study eye. When the ETDRS-DR severities were evaluable, they were categorized on the original scale with scores varying from 10 (DR absent) to 85 (very advanced PDR). All DRSS values were then converted into a 12-level scale, allowing the derivation of the ≥2-step and ≥3-step change from baseline for each post-baseline assessment".

    A lower score represents better functioning.

    Subjects who had full/partial panretinal photocoagulation or local photocoagulation for new vessel (DRSS score 60) at any visit were excluded.

    DRSS scores after start of alternative DME treatment in the study eye are censored and replaced by the last value prior to start of this alternative treatment.

  12. Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA): Frequency Distribution of Pre-existing ADA Status in the Brolucizumab Arm

    Time frame: Baseline

  13. Ocular AEs (Greater Than or Equal to 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term in the Study Eye

    Time frame: Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 30 days post treatment, up to a maximum duration of approximately 52 weeks.

  14. Number of Subjects With Non-ocular AEs (Greater Than or Equal to 2% in Any Treatment Arm)

    Time frame: Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 30 days post treatment, up to a maximum duration of approximately 52 weeks.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A 12-Month, 2-Arm, Randomized, Double-Masked, Multicenter Phase III Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab vs. Aflibercept in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema (KINGFISHER)

Acronym: KINGFISHER

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Apr 17, 2019
Registry last updated
Aug 12, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.