NCT Number: NCT01479374
Efficacy and Safety of AL-4943A Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC) Model
The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of AL-4943A ophthalmic solution for the treatment of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis using the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC) model.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
About this study
This study consisted of 5 Visits. Eligible patients underwent allergy testing using the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC) model, which reproduces the signs and symptoms of Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis by replicating the natural disease process. Patients demonstrating a positive reaction to the CAC at Visit 1 (screening) and Visit 2 (confirmatory) were randomized to treatment at Visit 3 (Day 0). The test article was instilled at Visit 3, with treatment efficacy CAC performed at 24 hours duration of action. The test article was instilled again at Visit 4 (Day 14), with treatment efficacy CAC performed at 16 hours duration of action. The test article was instilled a final time at Visit 5 (Day 21), with treatment efficacy performed at onset of action.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Able to be dosed in both eyes, able and willing to make the required study visits and to follow instructions.
- Diagnostic skin test indicative of allergy for cat hair, cat dander, grasses, ragweed, dust mite, dog dander, cockroach and/or trees within 24 months of Visit 1.
- History of seasonal or perennial allergic conjunctivitis for at least 1 year prior to Visit 1.
- Positive bilateral CAC response at Visit 1 and Visit 2.
- Willing to discontinue contact lens wear for at least 72 hours prior to Visit 1 and throughout the study.
- Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.
Exclusion criteria
- Known history or presence of persistent dry eye syndrome, or currently requiring frequent use (> 4 days per week) of artificial tears, gels or lubricants, presence of punctal plugs, use of Restasis®, or topical ocular corticosteroids for dryness of eyes.
- Presence of active blepharitis, active meibomian gland dysfunction, active rosacea affecting the ocular adnexa, follicular conjunctivitis, iritis, preauricular lymphadenopathy, ocular irritation not due to ocular allergy, or any other clinically significant ophthalmic abnormality that may affect the study outcomes.
- Presumed or actual ocular infection (bacterial, viral or fungal) or history of ocular herpes in either eye as determined by patient history and/or examination within 30 days of Visit 1.
- Presence of any chronic ocular degenerative condition or active intra-ocular inflammation in either eye that in the opinion of the Investigator is likely to advance/worsen during the time course of the study.
- Any contraindications or hypersensitivities to the use of the study medication or their components.
- Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.
Treatment and study plan
AL-4943A vehicle
DrugInactive ingredients used as placebo
Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution, 0.2%
DrugOther names: PATADAY®
Primary outcomes
-
Mean Ocular Itching at Onset of Action
Time frame: 3, 5, and 7 minute timepoints, post-CAC on Day 21 of receiving treatment
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 27 minutes after drop instillation. Ocular itching was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=incapacitating itch). Average of ocular itching score over both eyes was analyzed.
-
Mean Ocular Itching at 16 Hours Duration of Action
Time frame: 3, 5, and 7 minute timepoints, post-CAC on Day 14 of receiving treatment
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation. Ocular itching was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=incapacitating itch). Average of ocular itching score over both eyes was analyzed.
Secondary outcomes
-
Mean Conjunctival Redness at Onset of Action
Time frame: 7, 15, and 20 minute timepoints, post-CAC on Day 21 of receiving treatment
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 27 minutes after drop instillation. Conjunctival redness was assessed by the investigator on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=extremely severe). Average of conjunctival redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
-
Mean Conjunctival Redness at 16 Hours Duration of Action
Time frame: 7, 15, and 20 minute timepoints, post-CAC on Day 14 of receiving treatment
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation. Conjunctival redness was assessed by the investigator on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=extremely severe). Average of conjunctival redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
-
Mean Total Redness at 24 Hours Duration of Action
Time frame: 7, 15, and 20 minute timepoints, post-CAC on Day 1 of receiving treatment
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation. Total redness (0-12) is defined as the sum of ciliary redness (0-4 scale, from 0=none to 4=extremely severe), conjunctival redness (0-4 scale, from 0=none to 4=extremely severe), and episcleral redness (0-4 scale, from 0=none to 4=extremely severe). Average of total redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
-
Mean Ocular Itching at 24 Hours Duration of Action
Time frame: 3, 5, and 7 minute timepoints, post-CAC on Day 1 of receiving treatment
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation. Ocular itching was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=incapacitating itch). Average of ocular itching score over both eyes was analyzed.
-
Mean Conjunctival Redness at 24 Hours Duration of Action
Time frame: 7, 15, and 20 minute timepoints, post-CAC on Day 1 of receiving treatment
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation. Conjunctival redness was assessed by the investigator on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=extremely severe). Average of conjunctival redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Alcon Research
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Vehicle and Active Controlled, Parallel-Group Efficacy and Safety Study of AL-4943A Ophthalmic Solution, 0.77% in Patients With Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC) Model
Important dates
- Study start
- 2012
- Primary completion
- 2012
- Study completion
- 2012
- First posted
- Nov 24, 2011
- Registry last updated
- Jun 4, 2013
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
The INVIGORATE 2 Trial: A Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis
NCT05234554
Allergic Conjunctivitis, Conjunctival Diseases
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsA Study to Demonstrate How Well REGN1908-1909 Works in Reducing Ocular Allergy Signs and Symptoms in Adult Participants With Cat Allergy
NCT06602726
Allergic Conjunctivitis, Conjunctival Diseases
Andover, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsA Study to Demonstrate the Effect of REGN5713-5715 on Reducing Ocular Allergy Signs and Symptoms in Adult Participants With Birch Pollen Allergy
NCT06602739
Allergic Conjunctivitis, Conjunctival Diseases
Andover, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsThe Effects of Ectoin® Allergy Nasal Spray and Ectoin® Allergy Eye Drops Compared to Placebo
NCT01471184
Allergic Conjunctivitis, Allergic Rhinitis
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details