Public Health Laboratory Ivo de Carneri, P.O. Box 122
Chake Chake, Pemba, Tanzania
NCT Number: NCT03245398
This study is a double-blind randomized clinical trial which aims at providing evidence on the efficacy and safety of two regimens of mebendazole in school-aged children. Thus, our primary objective is to assess the efficacy and safety of: i) 100 mg solid tablets twice a day for 3 days, and ii) one dose of 500 mg solid tablets of mebendazole in participants aged 6-12, inclusive, infected with hookworm.
The primary endpoint of the trial is the cure rate (CR) of the 3-day regimen of mebendazole against hookworm and a single dose mebendazole treatment.
The secondary objectives are to determine if the multi-dose regimen is superior to the single dose regimen, evaluate the efficacy against concomitant soil-transmitted helminth infections, and assess the safety of both mebendazole regimens.
After obtaining informed consent from children's caregiver, the medical history of the participating individuals will be assessed with a standardized questionnaire, in addition to a clinical examination carried out by the study physician on the treatment day. Enrollment will be based on two stool samples which will be collected, if possible, on two consecutive days or otherwise within a maximum of 5 days apart. All stool samples will be examined with duplicated Kato-Katz thick smears by experienced laboratory technicians.
Randomization of participants into the two treatment arms will be stratified according to intensity of infection. Participants will be interviewed before treatment for clinical symptoms and 3 hours after every morning treatment and 24 hours after every morning treatment about the occurrence of adverse events. The efficacy of the treatment will be determined 14-21 days post-treatment by collecting another two stool samples.
The primary analysis will include all participants with primary end point data (available case analysis). Supplementary, two sensitivity analyses will be conducted imputing all missing endpoint data as treatment failures or all as treatment success. CRs will be calculated as the percentage of egg-positive participants at baseline who become egg-negative after treatment. CRs will be compared by using unadjusted logistic regression. To assess model robustness with respect to covariates, adjusted logistic regressions (adjustment for age, sex, school, weight and strata) will be performed.
Geometric and arithmetic mean egg counts will be calculated for the different treatment arms before and after treatment to assess the corresponding ERRs. Bootstrap resampling method with 5,000 replicates will be used to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for ERRs and the difference of the ERRs.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me6 year–12 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Chake Chake, Pemba, Tanzania
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
No written informed consent by parents and/or caregiver; no oral assent by participant.
Once in the morning and once in the evening for 3 consecutive days
Time frame: baseline (before treatment) and 18 to 22 days post-treatment
Cure rates (CRs) will be calculated as the percentage of egg-positive participants at baseline who become egg-negative after treatment.
Time frame: baseline (before treatment) and 18 to 22 days post-treatment
Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(geometric mean EPG at follow-up/geometric mean EPG at baseline))*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the "outcome measure" entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (geometric mean at follow-up/geometric mean at baseline)*100).
Time frame: baseline (before treatment) and 18 to 22 days post-treatment
Cure rates (CRs) will be calculated as the percentage of egg-positive participants at baseline who become egg-negative after treatment.
Time frame: baseline (before treatment) and 18 to 22 days post-treatment
Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(geometric mean EPG at follow-up/geometric mean EPG at baseline))*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the "outcome measure" entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (geometric mean at follow-up/geometric mean at baseline)*100).
Time frame: baseline (before treatment) and 18 to 22 days post-treatment
Cure rates (CRs) will be calculated as the percentage of egg-positive participants at baseline who become egg-negative after treatment.
Time frame: baseline (before treatment) and 18 to 22 days post-treatment
Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(geometric mean EPG at follow-up/geometric mean EPG at baseline))*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the "outcome measure" entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (geometric mean at follow-up/geometric mean at baseline)*100).
Time frame: baseline (before treatment) and 18 to 22 days post-treatment
Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(arithmetic mean EPG at follow-up/arithmetic mean EPG at baseline))*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the "outcome measure" entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (arithmetic mean at follow-up/arithmetic mean at baseline)*100).
Time frame: baseline (before treatment) and 18 to 22 days post-treatment
Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(arithmetic mean EPG at follow-up/arithmetic mean EPG at baseline))*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the "outcome measure" entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (arithmetic mean at follow-up/arithmetic mean at baseline)*100).
Time frame: baseline (before treatment) and 18 to 22 days post-treatment
Eggs per gram of stool (EPG) will be assessed by adding up the egg counts from the quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears and multiplying this number by a factor of six. The egg reduction rate (ERR) is calculated as follows: ERR = (1-(arithmetic mean EPG at follow-up/arithmetic mean EPG at baseline))*100). Note: in contrast to the publication the "outcome measure" entry mask requires the complementary percentage: (arithmetic mean at follow-up/arithmetic mean at baseline)*100).
Time frame: 1 year
Two aliquots (about 1 g of stool each) of positive samples will be stored in ethanol and transported to the Swiss Tropical Public Health Institute for subsequent DNA extraction and diagnostic.
Time frame: 2 years
The same two aliquots of stool will be used in this section.. Additionally, a Harada Mori culture will be prepared from one of the stool samples of each child at baseline and at follow-up to extract hatched larvae. Larvae will be stored in ethanol. Both stool and larvae samples will undergo an assessment of drug resistance-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms.
Time frame: 1 year
Genetic differentiation between Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale using PCRs will allow us to identify which of the species is most prevalent.
Jennifer Keiser
Other
Efficacy and Safety of a Single-dose Regimen and a Multi-dose Regimen of Mebendazole Against Hookworm Infections in School Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01869127
Ancylostomiasis, Anemia
Chake Chake, Pemba Island, Zanzibar, Tanzania
View Trial DetailsNCT06184399
Adenophorea Infections, Ancylostomiasis
Chake Chake, Tanzania
View Trial DetailsNCT06188715
Adenophorea Infections, Ancylostomiasis
Chake Chake, Tanzania
View Trial DetailsNCT02143518
Ancylostomiasis, Anemia
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial Details