Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt infection remains one of the most formidable challenges in paediatric neurosurgery, with reported incidence rates reaching as high as 11% to 18% in high-volume referral centers (1-5)
These infections lead to catastrophic consequences, including multiple revision surgeries, prolonged hospitalizations, and significant neurodevelopmental morbidity (2,6,7)
Currently, Antibiotic-Impregnated Catheters (AIC) are considered a standard preventive measure in many international guidelines (6,8,9). However, the prohibitive cost and limited accessibility of AICs-especially in resource-limited settings and public healthcare systems-preclude their routine use for every paediatric patient
This economic barrier has necessitated the search for a cost-effective, readily available alternative that provides comparable antimicrobial protection (10-12) Topical Vancomycin Powder (TVP) has emerged as a promising solution.(5,13-16) Unlike systemic prophylaxis, TVP provides an ultra-high local concentration of antibiotics directly at the surgical site, effectively inhibiting biofilm formation-the hallmark of shunt infections (3,17)
Recent high-level evidence has confirmed that TVP is safe for paediatric use, with no reported systemic toxicity or adverse effects on wound healing(18)(19)
While the efficacy of TVP has been observed in various neurosurgical procedures (13-15), there is a lack of prospective, stratified evidence regarding its performance across different hydrocephalus aetiologies when compared to standard non-impregnated shunts.
Most existing literature evaluates vancomycin powder in a generalized cohort. However, post-inflammatory (post-meningitic) and post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus cases often have a higher baseline risk of infection due to existing CSF changes.
This study uniquely addresses whether the efficacy of topical vancomycin varies across these different etiological strata (congenital - post-inflammatory - post-haemorrhagic hydrocephalus).
Furthermore, clinical outcomes are often confounded by mechanical factors such as distal catheter migration, this study aims to isolate the antimicrobial effect of vancomycin from mechanical shunt failures.
Unlike systemic antibiotics which contribute to global resistance, Topical Vancomycin provides maximal local efficacy with minimal systemic exposure, aligning with modern Antibiotic Stewardship goals to preserve systemic antibiotic potency while protecting surgical hardware (13)(18).
A critical distinction in this study is the use of Vancomycin in its crystalline powder form rather than aqueous irrigation. Comparative studies have demonstrated that while antibiotic irrigation provides a transient clearing of bacteria, it is rapidly absorbed or washed away, failing to maintain the necessary Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) during the crucial first 24-48 hours of wound healing.
In contrast, Topical Vancomycin Powder (TVP) acts as a sustained-release reservoir, dissolving slowly and maintaining ultra-high local concentrations exactly where the shunt hardware is most vulnerable to biofilm colonization. This 'depot effect' is what gives the powder a superior prophylactic profile over traditional irrigation method.(3)
Therefore, this study aims to evaluate to what extent topical vancomycin powder can effectively reduce infection rates and serve as a financially viable alternative to AICs in the paediatric population.