Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06382623

Efficacies of Different Managements in Patients With Trigger Finger

The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of peritendinous steroid injection under ultrasound guidance and percutaneous A1 pulley release procedures in terms of disease stage, pain, and severity of locking in patients with trigger finger.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital

Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

This study was designed as a randomized, controlled, prospective study. Patients who had been experiencing trigger finger symptoms for at least one month and who presented to the Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, affiliated with the Health Sciences University Faculty of Medicine

Patients were randomly divided into two groups: the peritendinous steroid group (n=15) and the percutaneous pulley release group (n=15). In the first group, under ultrasound guidance, a mixture of 1 ml corticosteroid (2 mg+5 mg/ml betamethasone) and 1 ml local anesthetic (20 ml 2% prilocaine) was injected peritendinously between the A1 pulley and the flexor tendon sheath. In the second group, a percutaneous A1 pulley release procedure was performed under ultrasound guidance using a 20 G needle, followed by peritendinous injection of the same mixture of corticosteroid and local anesthetic.

Patients were evaluated four times: before treatment, at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after treatment. Modified Quinnel classification, VAS (Visual Analog Scale), and severity of locking scales were used as outcome measures in the study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being over 18 years of age
  • Having had trigger finger complaints for more than 1 month
  • Not having received any injections for trigger finger diagnosis within the last 1 month
  • Signing the informed consent form indicating willingness to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Refusing to participate in the study
  • Presence of partial or complete tendon rupture in the relevant tendon of the finger to be treated
  • Presence of wounds and infection in the area where the procedure will be performed
  • Pregnancy status
  • History of allergy to the injected medications (local anesthetic, steroid)

Treatment and study plan

The percutaneous A1 pulley release

Procedure

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous pulley release is a procedure aimed at loosening the pulley using various cutting instruments or hypodermic needles under ultrasound guidance.

The peritendinous Betamethasone group

Other

USG-guided injection of corticosteroid between the A1 pulley and the flexor tendon sheath.

Primary outcomes

  1. Stage of the disease

    Time frame: first week, first mount, third month

    Modified Quinnel classification Stage 1: Normal movement, no pain.

    • Stage 2: Normal movement, occasional pain.
    • Stage 3: Irregular movement (catching without crepitus or locking).
    • Stage 4: Locking present, actively correctable.
    • Stage 5: Locking present, passively correctable.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    Time frame: first week, first month, third month

    The pain associated with movement in the relevant finger was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Patients were explained that "0" represented no pain at all, "10" represented the most severe pain they had ever experienced in their life, and "5" represented moderate pain. They were asked to indicate a number between 0 and 10 that corresponded to the intensity of pain they were feeling.

  2. severity of triggering

    Time frame: first week, first month, third month

    The severity of catching in patients was assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10. Patients were explained that "0" represents no catching at all, while "10" represents catching requiring passive correction of the finger. They were asked to mark a number between 0 and 10 corresponding to the severity of catching they experienced.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparing the Effectiveness of Peritendinous Steroid Injection Under Ultrasound Guidance With Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release in Trigger Finger Treatment

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Apr 24, 2024
Registry last updated
Jun 6, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.