Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06814691

Effects on In-Game Decision Making Processes

This study aims to investigate the effects of analytical thinking skills and reaction speed on performance in female football players.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Athletic Injuries Behavior Motor Activity Wounds and Injuries

Age range

18 year–35 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Bahçehir University

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

This study aims to investigate the effects of analytical thinking skills and reaction speed on performance in female football players.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Accepting the voluntary basis
  • To be between the ages of 18-35
  • To take part in professional football clubs
  • Not having suffered any serious injury in the last 6 months
  • To be able to participate in the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale
  • To be able to actively participate in technology-based tests such as decision-making simulations and Blazepod

Exclusion criteria

  • Not accepting the voluntary basis
  • Individuals who have had a surgical procedure in the last six months
  • Use of NSAIDs and similar disease modifying drugs in the last month (Diaserein, Glucosamine etc.)

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of Analytical Thinking and Decision-Making Processes

    Time frame: day 1

    Female football players' analytical thinking skills will be evaluated through decision-making simulations and video-based training (VBT).

  2. Assessment of Analytical Thinking and Decision-Making Processes-Accuracy

    Time frame: day 1

    Female football players' analytical thinking skills will be evaluated through decision-making simulations and video-based training (VBT).

  3. Assessment of Analytical Thinking and Decision-Making Processes-Error Rates

    Time frame: day 1

    Female football players' analytical thinking skills will be evaluated through decision-making simulations and video-based training (VBT).

  4. Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-Reaction Times

    Time frame: day 1

    The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia is a 17-item scale developed to assess fear of movement and reinjury. It includes parameters related to work activities, injury/reinjury, and fear-avoidance behaviors. The scale uses a 4-point Likert scoring system (1 = Strongly Disagree, 4 = Strongly Agree). After reversing the scores of items 4, 8, 12, and 16, a total score is calculated, ranging from 17 to 68, where higher scores indicate greater kinesiophobia.

  5. Reaction Time Measurement (Using Blazepod)

    Time frame: day 1

    Blazepod devices will be used to measure the reaction speed and agility of female football players. Pods will be randomly placed and programmed to flash at specific intervals. Participants will be required to respond quickly to the flashing pods, with their reaction times recorded in milliseconds. Statistical data such as correct and incorrect response rates will also be obtained.

  6. Y-Balance Test

    Time frame: day 1

    Evaluates balance by measuring reach distances in anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions.

  7. Push-Up Test

    Time frame: day 1

    Assesses upper body strength and endurance based on the number of push-ups performed.

  8. Seated Ball Throw Test

    Time frame: day 1

    Measures upper body power by recording the distance a seated participant can throw a ball.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Istanbul Medipol University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of Analytical Thinking Skills and Reaction Tests of Female Football Players on Performance: Effects on In-Game Decision Making Processes

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Feb 7, 2025
Registry last updated
Feb 12, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.