Service Médecine Intensive et Réanimation
Marseille, 13015, France
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06212492
The improved survival of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) over the last decades is related to the use of so-called "protective" mechanical ventilation. Two therapies have been shown to increase survival among the most hypoxemic patients (PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg): a continuous use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) for 48 hours in the acute phase of ARDS and prone positioning (PP). NMBAs and PP are part of the latest guidelines from French ICU Society. However, North American guidelines recommend PP for patients with severe ARDS only but not NMBAs, given the results of the ROSE study which did not confirm the benefit on mortality demonstrated in the ACURASYS study. However, in the ROSE study, ventilatory strategy, use of NMBAs and PP were different from the ACURASYS study.
Yet, NMBAs and PP are frequently associated in clinical practice, particularly with the COVID-19 pandemic, but also in randomized trials. In the PROSEVA study, almost all the patients (91%) received a continuous infusion of NMBAs during PP. Indeed, there is a common physiopathological rationale in both techniques: they favor the homogenization of transpulmonary pressures (TPP), reduce lung overdistension, Pendelluft effect and thus ventilator induced lung injury (VILI), in particular barotrauma and biotrauma. This reduction of biotrauma has been demonstrated for PP and NMBAs separately, but never by comparing the combined effect of the 2 techniques to each of them separately. This comparison requires reliable tools. In recent years, the "soluble form of the receptor for advanced glycation end products" (sRAGE), a new biomarker specific of pulmonary epithelial aggression and therefore of biotrauma, has been described and evaluated during ARDS and appears to be associated with the severity of pulmonary damage and prognosis.
Overall, despite an interesting physiopathological rationale and a clinically widespread practice, there is currently no study evaluating the synergistic effect of PP and NMBAs in the treatment of ARDS, in particular on the prevention of VILI, and more precisely of biotrauma. This question seems crucial to better specify the respective place of each of these treatments in the management strategy of ARDS patients whose prevalence and mortality remain high.
The objective of this study is therefore to evaluate, using a recent and reliable biomarker, the synergistic effect of a short-term NMBAs infusion using cisatracurium and PP on the reduction of biotrauma during moderate to severe ARDS. The investigators will compare this "synergistic" treatment to the use of PP alone. They will also evaluate, in secondary objectives, the effects of PP and NMBAs combination on clinical outcomes and on the patients' prognosis.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Marseille, 13015, France
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Early and systematic use of NMBAs
Early and systematic use of prone positioning
Time frame: Day 1
Our primary outcome will be the comparison of the differences in plasma sRAGE levels before and after the first PP session (∆ sRAGE), a kinetic being probably more relevant than a raw value, given the observed inter-individual variations of sRAGE at basal state.
Time frame: Day 1
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Time frame: Day 1
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Time frame: Day 1
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Time frame: Day 2
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Time frame: Day 1
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Time frame: Day 1
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Time frame: Day 1
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Time frame: Day 2
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Time frame: Day 1
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Time frame: Day 1
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Time frame: Day 1
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Time frame: Day 2
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Time frame: Day 1
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Time frame: Day 1
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Time frame: Day 1
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Time frame: Day 2
Inflammation, pulmonary epithelial and endothelial dysfunction
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Hematosis
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Hematosis
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Hematosis
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Hematosis
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Hematosis
Time frame: 48 hours after inclusion
Hematosis
Time frame: 72 hours after inclusion
Hematosis
Time frame: 7 days after inclusion
Hematosis
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Hematosis
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Hematosis
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Hematosis
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Hematosis
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Hematosis
Time frame: 48 hours after inclusion
Hematosis
Time frame: 72 hours after inclusion
Hematosis
Time frame: 7 days after inclusion
Hematosis
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Hematosis
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Hematosis
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Hematosis
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Hematosis
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Hematosis
Time frame: 48 hours after inclusion
Hematosis
Time frame: 72 hours after inclusion
Hematosis
Time frame: 7 days after inclusion
Hematosis
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 48 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 72 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 7 days after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 48 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 72 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 7 days after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28,
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 48 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 72 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 7 days after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 48 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 72 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 7 days after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 48 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 72 hours after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 7 days after inclusion
Protective mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Alveolar recruitment
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Alveolar recruitment
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Alveolar recruitment
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Alveolar recruitment
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Alveolar recruitment
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Alveolar recruitment
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Alveolar recruitment
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Alveolar recruitment
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Alveolar recruitment
Time frame: Within the first 7 days
Barotrauma
Time frame: Within the first 7 days
Barotrauma
Time frame: Within the first 7 days
Barotrauma
Time frame: At Day 28
Time frame: At Day 90
Time frame: At Day 28
Time frame: At Day 90
Time frame: At Day 28
Time frame: At Day 90
Time frame: Maximum 3 months after inclusion (follow-up duration)
Time frame: Maximum 3 months after inclusion (follow-up duration)
Time frame: At day 28 or discharge
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
Other
Effects on Biotrauma of Combining Routine CURArization With Prone Positioning During Adult Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Acronym: CURA-PRONE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.