Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03662152

Effects of Vibration Foam Rolling After Muscle Damage

Purpose: To compare the effects between non-vibration foam rolling (NVFR) and vibration foam rolling (VFR) on visual analogic scale (VAS), pressure pain threshold (PPT), oxygen saturation (SmO2), counter-movement jump (CMJ), and hip and knee range of movement (ROM) after induction of muscle damage through eccentric acute-exercise using inertial flywheel.

Methods: Thirty-eight healthy subjects (males n=32 females= 6, age 22.2±3.2 years) were randomly assigned in a counter-balanced fashion to either a VFR or NVFR protocol group. All subjects performed a 10x10 (sets x reps) eccentric squat protocol to induce muscle damage. The protocols were administered 48-h post-exercise, measuring VAS, PPT, SmO2, CMJ and ROM, before and immediately post-treatment. The technique of treatment was repeated on both legs for 1 min for a total of 5 sets, with a 30-s rest between sets.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Pain, Acute Acute Pain Neurologic Manifestations Pain Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Signs and Symptoms

Age range

18 year–30 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle

Madrid, 28023, Spain

About this study

Muscle damage was induced with overload eccentric training using inertial flywheel (2.7-kg flywheels with a moment inertia of 0.07 kg m-2). Immediately after baseline measures, subjects performed 10 sets x 10 repetitions parallel squats using a gravity-free training device flywheel with 2 minutes of recovery between sets. The squat exercise was chosen as basic movement because of its similar muscles recruitment to many athletic movements patterns. Furthermore, the squat exercise is one of the main exercises used to improve the lower-body strength. The required technique was demonstrated to all subjects before beginning the eccentric session, and they were coached during the protocol to be sure adequate technique and maximal effort in each repetition were maintained. All participants performed 5 min on a treadmill to warm up before performing the eccentric bout.

Description of the foam roller intervention The foam-rolling technique was based on a previously published protocol. In both protocols, the technique was repeated on both legs for 1 min for a total of 5 sets, with a 30-s rest between sets. The cadence for both techniques (NVFR and VFR) was fixed at 3:4 using a metronome.

Using a protocol adapted from previous study, subjects began in the plank position with the foam roller at the most proximal portion of the quadriceps of both legs, with as much of their body mass as possible on the foam roller.

Non-Vibration Foam Rolling (NVFR) Group: subjects performed the FR protocol using a custom-made foam roller composed of a polystyrene foam cylinder (15-cm diameter × 35-cm long).

Vibration Foam Rolling (VFR) Group: subjects performed the same protocol using a foam roller with vibration (frequency: 18 Hz) composed of a polystyrene foam cylinder (15-cm diameter × 35-cm long).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All subjects were free from musculoskeletal disorders in the last year. All subjects were asked to abstain from unaccustomed exercise, all medications and dietary supplements 72 hours before baseline measurements, during the experimental period and post-treatment

Exclusion criteria

  • Subjects with symptoms or pathology,

Treatment and study plan

Foam roller

Device

Foam roller massage after DOMS

Vibration foam roller

Device

Foam roller massage with vibration after DOMS

Primary outcomes

  1. visual-analogue scale (VAS)

    Time frame: 2 seconds

    used to measure DOMS and to estimate the intensity of its associated pain. In order to standardize the scaling instructions, the endpoints were described for the subject as 0 = 'no sensation' and 10 = 'the most worst intense sensation imaginable' (16,40). The VAS was measured in four different conditions: 1) passive, 2) during isometric quadriceps contraction, 3) performing a squat and 4) during stretch quadriceps.

  2. Pressure pain threshold

    Time frame: 1 minute

    measured using a digital pressure algometer (Microfet3 ®, Hoggan Health Industries). The digital dynamometer with a 1 cm probe was used to measure three points at the quadriceps: vastus lateralis (VL), rectus femoris (RF) and vastus medialis (VM). Subject was lying on the stretcher, the algometer was positioned perpendicularly to the skin at each point and gradual pressure was applied until the subject reported a change from the sensation of pressure to pain. In that point the pressure was stopped immediately and the value was recorded represented the pain threshold (16). The mean of the 3 measures was calculated. Algometry has been shown to be highly reliable (ICC = 0.91) (9).

  3. Muscle oxygenation

    Time frame: 2 minutes

    was recorded at rest, during 10 squat repetitions (body weight load) and immediately after, using a commercially available portable non-invasive near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) device (Moxy, Fortiori Design LLC, Minnesota, USA).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Infrared Optojump photoelectric cells (Microgate Corporation, Bolzano, Italy)

    Time frame: 5 minutes

    were used to measure explosive strength in lower limbs

  2. Passive and active hip extension and knee flexion ROM of the dominant leg

    Time frame: 2 minutes

    were measured with a Microfet3 ® inclinometer using the protocol of Norkin & White

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Daniel Muñoz-Garcia

Other

Collaborators

  • Camilo Jose Cela University

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Vibration Foam Rolling and Non-vibration Foam Rolling in Recovery After Exercise Induce Muscle Damage

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Sep 7, 2018
Registry last updated
Sep 10, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.