Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05941039

Effects of Vestibular Training on Postural Control of Healthy Adults Using Virtual Reality

Postural instability is a common symptom of vestibular dysfunction that impacts a person's day-to-day activities. Vestibular rehabilitation is effective in decreasing dizziness, visual symptoms and improving postural control through several mechanisms including sensory reweighting. As part of the sensory reweighting mechanisms, vestibular activation training with headshake activities influence vestibular reflexes. However, combining challenging vestibular and postural tasks to facilitate more effective rehabilitation outcomes is under-utilized. The novel concurrent headshake and weight shift training (Concurrent HS-WST) is purported to train the vestibular system to directly impact the postural control system simultaneously and engage sensory reweighting to improve balance. Young healthy participants will perform the training by donning a virtual reality headset with an overhead harness on and a spotter present to prevent any falls. The investigators propose that this training strategy would show improved outcomes over traditional training methods by improving vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR) gains, eye movement variability, sensory reweighting and promoting postural balance. The findings of this study may guide clinicians to develop rehabilitation methods for vestibular postural control in neurological populations with vestibular and/or sensorimotor control impairment.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Virtual Reality Balance Assessment Vestibular Training

Age range

18 year–35 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to stand independently (without an assistive device)
  • This study requires participants to perform postural assessments including reactive balance following mechanical perturbations.
  • Participants will also perform headshake activities and weight shift training in standing for 20 mins will mini breaks.
  • Participants must be within the age of 18-35.
  • A power analysis revealed that a sample of 24 participants will required for a two-group comparison to detect a significant difference at alpha=0.05 and 0.30 effect size at beta=0.8 (G*Power, Version 3.0.10)(Faul et al, 2007).

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants with an evidence of:
  • Concussion, vestibular, balance or oculomotor issues for the prior 6 months.
  • Neuropathic conditions, particularly affecting the lower extremities. Participants with this issue will have sensory impairments which can affect their sensory assessment.
  • Current musculoskeletal deficits including significant postural abnormalities (signs of spinal, pelvic and leg length discrepancies).
  • Pain or limitations in neck range of motion.
  • Recent (within 6 months) orthopedic surgery that impacts postural training.
  • Visual Impairment
  • Participants must be able to see and follow targets on the computer monitor. Therefore, subjects must have 20/50 (corrected) vision. Subjects who are blind cannot participate.

Treatment and study plan

Vestibular training using VR followed by Control

Device

A cross-over design will be used with group one receiving the training intervention for 6 days, a 4-day washout period, and a 6-day no-training period.

Control followed by Vestibular training using VR

Device

Group two will follow the reverse sequence.

Primary outcomes

  1. Vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain

    Time frame: Two week study period

    Horizontal and vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain will be assessed using the video head impulse test (vHIT; ICS, Otometrics, Taastrup, Denmark). Twenty head impulses each will be performed to assess each direction of the semicircular canals with participant in a seated position

  2. Eye movement variability

    Time frame: Two week study period

    Horizontal and vertical eye movements will be assessed during force plate perturbation trials using BlueGain electro-oculography (EOG) device (Cambridge Research Systems). Participants will stand on a force plate perturbation device with EOG electrodes affixed on eye muscles to record eye movements during toes up (simulating being pushed backward) and toes down (simulating being pushed forward) perturbation rotation trials.

  3. Electromyography (EMG) amplitude

    Time frame: Two week study period

    Electromyography (EMG) will be assessed during force plate perturbation trials using Delsys Trigno wireless sensors (Delsys Inc., Boston, MA). Participants will stand on a force plate perturbation device with EMG sensors placed on postural muscles to record electrical activity during toes up (simulating being pushed backward) and toes down (simulating being pushed forward) perturbation rotation trials.

  4. Electromyography (EMG) time onset

    Time frame: Two week study period

    Electromyography (EMG) will be assessed during force plate perturbation trials using Delsys Trigno wireless sensors (Delsys Inc., Boston, MA). Participants will stand on a force plate perturbation device with EMG sensors placed on postural muscles to record electrical activity during toes up (simulating being pushed backward) and toes down (simulating being pushed forward) perturbation rotation trials.

  5. Balance equilibrium and composite scores

    Time frame: Two week study period

    Equilibrium and composite scores will be assessed by the Modified Clinical Test for Sensory Interaction on Balance (MCTSIB; NeuroCom®, Natus Medical Inc., Pleasanton, CA) during quiet stance. The MCTSIB requires the participant to stand upright as stable as possible for 10 s under four different conditions: (1) eyes open (EO) on a stable surface (SS), (2) eyes closed (EC) on SS, (3) EO on foam surface (FS), (4) EC on FS.

  6. Sensory ratios

    Time frame: Two week study period

    Sensory ratios will be assessed by the Modified Clinical Test for Sensory Interaction on Balance (MCTSIB; NeuroCom®, Natus Medical Inc., Pleasanton, CA) during quiet stance. The MCTSIB requires the participant to stand upright as stable as possible for 10 s under four different conditions: (1) eyes open (EO) on a stable surface (SS), (2) eyes closed (EC) on SS, (3) EO on foam surface (FS), (4) EC on FS.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Evan Laing, BS

CONTACT

[email protected]

518-860-9789

Kwadwo Appiah-kubi, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

347-284-9986

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Clarkson University

Other

Collaborators

  • Temple University

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jul 12, 2023
Registry last updated
Jun 17, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.