Ruhr University Bochum
Bochum, Germany
NCT Number: NCT05718271
The goal of this study is to examine if verbal instructions can improve fear extinction learning and extinction retrieval in patients with anxiety disorders (AD) and healthy controls.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bochum, Germany
Patients with anxiety disorders (AD) and highly anxious individuals show accelerated fear conditioning and diminished fear extinction learning (Duits et al., 2015). The aim of the current study is to investigate how verbal instructions impact fear extinction learning and extinction retrieval in AD patients and healthy controls. Using a 3-day fear conditioning paradigm, fear acquisition will take place on the first, extinction training on the second, and extinction retrieval and reinstatement on the third day (i.e., all phases are on consecutive days). Part of the participants will receive explicit instructions such that the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) won't be presented anymore, either before and/or after extinction training. Participants will be randomly assigned to four conditions: (1) no explicit instructions at all, (2) explicit instructions before extinction, (3) explicit instructions after extinction or (4) explicit instructions before and after extinction.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
"Shocks will no longer be administered during the next phase."
"Tomorrow no shocks will be administered."
Time frame: Experimental Day 2
The difference between the reinforced conditioned stimulus (CS+) and non-reinforced conditioned stimulus (CS-) will be measured on 3 different levels: skin conductance responses (SCRs), CS valence ratings ("How pleasant do you feel when you see this picture?"), and UCS expectancy ratings ("Do you think that this picture is paired with an electrical stimulation?").
Time frame: Experimental Day 3
The difference between the reinforced conditioned stimulus (CS+) and non-reinforced conditioned stimulus (CS-) will be measured on 3 different levels: skin conductance responses (SCRs), CS valence ratings ("How pleasant do you feel when you see this picture?"), and UCS expectancy ratings ("Do you think that this picture is paired with an electrical stimulation?").
Time frame: Experimental Day 1
The difference between the reinforced conditioned stimulus (CS+) and non-reinforced conditioned stimulus (CS-) will be measured on 3 different levels: skin conductance responses (SCRs), CS valence ratings ("How pleasant do you feel when you see this picture?"), and UCS expectancy ratings ("Do you think that this picture is paired with an electrical stimulation?").
Time frame: Experimental Day 1
After fear acquisition, it will be checked if participants can correctly determine which CS had been paired with the UCS.
Time frame: Experimental Day 1
The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale measures a person's degree of vigilance, burden and disturbed action ability when experiencing uncertain situations. The items are scored on a 5-point scale from 1 = "not at all characteristic of me' to 5 = "entirely characteristic of me" and higher IU scale scores are related to higher intolerance of uncertainty. High IU supposedly plays an important role in maintaining fear and anxiety and is related to poorer fear extinction.
Time frame: Experimental Day 1
The GSE Scale contains ten items and measures how confident the person feels to overcome difficult situations based on their self-assessed competence. The GSE items are scored on a four-point scale with 1 = not at all true, 2 = hardly true, 3 = moderately true and 4 = exactly true. The total score is determined by summing up all item scores, which results in a score between 10 and 40, where the higher scores represent higher GSE.
Time frame: Experimental Day 1
Trait anxiety will be measured with 20 items of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. The items are measured on a four-point scale ranging from 1 = hardly ever to 4 = always. The total score of trait anxiety is calculated by summing up the scores (ranging from 20 to 80), whereby higher scores are indicative of higher trait anxiety.
Ruhr University of Bochum
Other
The Effects of Verbal Instructions on Fear Extinction and Extinction Retrieval in Patients With Anxiety Disorders and Healthy Controls
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06333925
Anxiety Disorder, Anxiety Disorders
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07045818
Anxiety Disorder, Anxiety Disorders
Shenyang, Liaoning, China
View Trial DetailsNCT01117753
Anxiety Disorder, Anxiety Disorders
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04182061
Anxiety Disorder, Anxiety Disorders
Madrid, Spain
View Trial Details