Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07652307

Effects of Velocity-Based and Traditional Resistance Training on Performance in Trained Male Football Players

This study compared the effects of velocity-based resistance training (VBRT) and traditional resistance training (TRT) on physical performance, anaerobic capacity, and perceptual responses in trained male football players. Sixteen participants were randomly assigned to either a VBRT group or a TRT group and completed an 8-week resistance training program. The study aimed to determine whether VBRT provides greater improvements in explosive performance, anaerobic power, balance, football-specific performance, and fatigue-related perceptions compared with traditional percentage-based resistance training.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–25 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Sinop University, Faculty of Sport Sciences

Sinop, 57000, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Resistance training is widely used in football to improve strength, power, and sport-specific performance. Traditional resistance training typically prescribes training loads based on fixed percentages of one-repetition maximum (1RM). However, this approach may not adequately account for daily fluctuations in neuromuscular readiness and fatigue. Velocity-based resistance training (VBRT) has emerged as an alternative method that uses movement velocity to individualize training load and regulate training effort.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of velocity-based resistance training and traditional percentage-based resistance training in trained male football players. Participants were randomly assigned to either a VBRT group or a traditional resistance training (TRT) group and completed an 8-week resistance training intervention consisting of deep squat, half squat, and bench press exercises performed twice weekly.

In the VBRT group, training loads were adjusted using individualized load-velocity profiles and velocity-loss thresholds, whereas the TRT group trained using fixed percentages of baseline one-repetition maximum values. The study was designed to evaluate whether individualized velocity-based load prescription could improve neuromuscular performance and fatigue management compared with traditional resistance training methods.

The findings of this study may contribute to the understanding of practical resistance training strategies for football players and provide information regarding the effectiveness of velocity-based training for improving performance-related and fatigue-related adaptations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male football players aged 18 to 25 years
  • Actively participating in organized football training and competition
  • At least 1 year of structured resistance training experience
  • Regular exposure to football-specific training loads
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Musculoskeletal injury within the previous 6 months
  • Neurological, orthopedic, or chronic disorders affecting physical performance
  • Use of ergogenic aids or supplements that could influence neuromuscular performance
  • Participation in additional resistance training outside the study protocol
  • Missing more than 10% of the scheduled training sessions

Treatment and study plan

Velocity-Based Resistance Training

Behavioral

Participants completed an 8-week velocity-based resistance training program performed twice weekly. Training consisted of deep squat, half squat, and bench press exercises. Training loads were prescribed using individualized load-velocity profiles and adjusted according to target movement velocities and a 20% velocity-loss threshold.

Traditional Resistance Training

Behavioral

Participants completed an 8-week traditional percentage-based resistance training program performed twice weekly. Training consisted of deep squat, half squat, and bench press exercises. Training loads were prescribed using fixed percentages of baseline one-repetition maximum values.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Vertical Jump Height at 8 Weeks

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

    Vertical jump height (cm) measured using a digital vertical jump device to assess lower-body explosive performance.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sinop University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Velocity-Based and Traditional Resistance Training on Physical Performance, Anaerobic Capacity, and Perceptual Responses in Trained Male Football Players

Acronym: VBRT-TRT-FP

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 17, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 17, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.