Sinop University, Faculty of Sport Sciences
Sinop, 57000, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07652307
This study compared the effects of velocity-based resistance training (VBRT) and traditional resistance training (TRT) on physical performance, anaerobic capacity, and perceptual responses in trained male football players. Sixteen participants were randomly assigned to either a VBRT group or a TRT group and completed an 8-week resistance training program. The study aimed to determine whether VBRT provides greater improvements in explosive performance, anaerobic power, balance, football-specific performance, and fatigue-related perceptions compared with traditional percentage-based resistance training.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–25 year
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Sinop, 57000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Resistance training is widely used in football to improve strength, power, and sport-specific performance. Traditional resistance training typically prescribes training loads based on fixed percentages of one-repetition maximum (1RM). However, this approach may not adequately account for daily fluctuations in neuromuscular readiness and fatigue. Velocity-based resistance training (VBRT) has emerged as an alternative method that uses movement velocity to individualize training load and regulate training effort.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of velocity-based resistance training and traditional percentage-based resistance training in trained male football players. Participants were randomly assigned to either a VBRT group or a traditional resistance training (TRT) group and completed an 8-week resistance training intervention consisting of deep squat, half squat, and bench press exercises performed twice weekly.
In the VBRT group, training loads were adjusted using individualized load-velocity profiles and velocity-loss thresholds, whereas the TRT group trained using fixed percentages of baseline one-repetition maximum values. The study was designed to evaluate whether individualized velocity-based load prescription could improve neuromuscular performance and fatigue management compared with traditional resistance training methods.
The findings of this study may contribute to the understanding of practical resistance training strategies for football players and provide information regarding the effectiveness of velocity-based training for improving performance-related and fatigue-related adaptations.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants completed an 8-week velocity-based resistance training program performed twice weekly. Training consisted of deep squat, half squat, and bench press exercises. Training loads were prescribed using individualized load-velocity profiles and adjusted according to target movement velocities and a 20% velocity-loss threshold.
Participants completed an 8-week traditional percentage-based resistance training program performed twice weekly. Training consisted of deep squat, half squat, and bench press exercises. Training loads were prescribed using fixed percentages of baseline one-repetition maximum values.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Vertical jump height (cm) measured using a digital vertical jump device to assess lower-body explosive performance.
Sinop University
Other
Effects of Velocity-Based and Traditional Resistance Training on Physical Performance, Anaerobic Capacity, and Perceptual Responses in Trained Male Football Players
Acronym: VBRT-TRT-FP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07479368
Decision Making, Football Players
Medellín, Colombia
View Trial DetailsNCT07604519
Cognitive Performance During Physical Activity, Fatigue
Budapest, Hungary
View Trial DetailsNCT06375356
Resistance Training
Stanford, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07653425
Resistance Training
Concepción, Chile
View Trial Details