Aristotle University
Serres, Agios Ioannis, 62110, Greece
NCT Number: NCT01853462
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of supervised balance and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) training for the rehabilitation of ankle sprains
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–40 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Serres, Agios Ioannis, 62110, Greece
Supervised proprioceptive training has been recommended by recently published guidelines for the rehabilitation of ankle sprains. However, research evidence on the efficacy of this type of training is still weak, mainly owing to the methodological limitations of relevant studies. In addition, there is paucity of evidence concerning the effects of such training for the outcomes of functional performance, pain, ankle range of motion, and contradictory results have been reported for postural control.
This study aimed to substantiate the benefits of supervised training for the rehabilitation of ankle sprains, and elucidate the effects of two different proprioceptive protocols on the above-mentioned outcomes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Ten individual PNF sessions, supervised by a physical therapist, with 50-60 min duration per session, within a maximal five-week period
Ten individual balance sessions, supervised by a physical therapist, with 50-60 min duration per session, within a maximal five-week period
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
Participants hopped, using the sprained leg, as far forward as possible, and remained in the landing position for 2sec. Three trials were performed, and the mean hopping distance was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
Participants hopped, using the sprained leg, as fast as possible, a six-meter distance. Three trials were performed, and the mean hopping time was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The rising on heel test was used, and participants rose on the heel of the sprained leg, as many times as possible.
Scoring:10 points for >40 rises, 5 points for 30-39 rises, 0 points for <30 rises.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The rising on toes test was used, and participants rose on the toes of the sprained leg, as many times as possible. Scoring:10 points for >40 rises, 5 points for 30-39 rises, 0 points for <30 rises.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The Biodex Stability System, which is a dynamic tilting platform, was used for assessment. The anterior-posterior stability index corresponded to the variance of foot platform displacement in the sagittal plane, and it was measured in single-leg stance, for the sprained leg, without footwear. Three 20-sec trials were performed, with open eyes, and the mean score was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The Biodex Stability System, which is a dynamic tilting platform, was used for assessment. The medial-lateral stability index corresponded to the variance of foot platform displacement in the frontal plane, and it was measured in single-leg stance, for the sprained leg, without footwear. Three 20-sec trials were performed, with open eyes, and the mean score was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The Biodex Stability System, which is a dynamic tilting platform, was used for assessment. The overall stability index corresponded to the variance of foot platform overall displacement, and it was measured in single-leg stance, for the sprained leg, without footwear. Three 20-sec trials were performed, with open eyes, and the mean score was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
Assessement was performed with a goniometer. Participants actively dorsiflexed the sprained ankle, while being in long sitting, on a physical therapy table. The mean score of three measurements was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The main component of the Greek version of the short form of McGill Pain Questionnaire (GR-SFMPQ) was used for the assessment of pain sensation of the sprained ankle. This consists of 15 descriptive adjectives for the pain sensation (11 sensory and 4 affective), which are self-rated according to their intensity level on a 4-point rating scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). The total rating score (minimum = 0, maximum = 45) of the main component of the GR-SFMPQ was used for data analysis, with higher values representing a worse pain sensation.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The second component of the Greek version of the short form of McGill Pain Questionnaire, which is a visual analogue scale (VAS), was used for the assessment. The VAS is a horizontal 10-cm line with clearly defined boundaries: 0 cm = 'No pain' and 10.0 cm = 'worst possible pain'. partipants made a mark on the line at the point that better described the average pain intensity for their sprained ankle, during the week before testing. The distance marked from the 'no pain' point was measured in mm and was used for data analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The third component of the Greek version of the short form of McGill Pain Questionnaire, which is a 6-point verbal rating scale, was used for the assessment. Participants noted what word at the time completing the questionnaire would best describe their pain sensation for the sprained ankle (scoring: no pain = 0, mild = 1, discomforting = 2, distressing = 3, horrible = 4, excruciating = 5). The score corresponding to the noted word was used for data analysis, with higher values representing a worse pain sensation.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The Biodex isokinetic dynamometer was used for assessment. During testing, participants were blindfolded, in the seated position, with footwear on.The internal goniometer of Biodex recorded the degrees of error for the active repositioning of 10° dorsiflexion (non-weight-bearing) for the sprained ankle, and the mean of three trials was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The Biodex isokinetic dynamometer was used for assessment. During testing, participants were blindfolded, in the seated position, with footwear on.The internal goniometer of Biodex recorded the degrees of error for the active repositioning of 15° plantar flexion (non-weight-bearing) for the sprained ankle, and the mean of three trials was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The Biodex isokinetic dynamometer was used for assessment. During testing, participants were blindfolded, in the seated position, with footwear on.The internal goniometer of Biodex recorded the degrees of error for the active repositioning of 30° plantar flexion (non-weight-bearing) for the sprained ankle, and the mean of three trials was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The Biodex isokinetic dynamometer was used for assessment. During isokinetic testing of the ankle joint, participants were in the seated position, with footwear on. Measurements were taken for the sprained leg, and the mean of five maximal trials was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The Biodex isokinetic dynamometer was used for assessment. During isokinetic testing of the ankle joint, participants were in the seated position, with footwear on. Measurements were taken for the sprained leg, and the mean of five maximal trials was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The Biodex isokinetic dynamometer was used for assessment. During isokinetic testing of the ankle joint, participants were in the seated position, with footwear on. Measurements were taken for the sprained leg, and the mean of five maximal trials was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The Biodex isokinetic dynamometer was used for assessment. During isokinetic testing of the ankle joint, participants were in the seated position, with footwear on. Measurements were taken for the sprained leg, and the mean of five maximal trials was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The Biodex isokinetic dynamometer was used for assessment. During isokinetic testing of the subtalar joint, participants were in the seated position, with footwear on. Measurements were taken for the sprained leg, and the mean of five maximal trials was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The Biodex isokinetic dynamometer was used for assessment. During isokinetic testing of the subtalar joint, participants were in the seated position, with footwear on. Measurements were taken for the sprained leg, and the mean of five maximal trials was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The Biodex isokinetic dynamometer was used for assessment. During isokinetic testing of the subtalar joint, participants were in the seated position, with footwear on. Measurements were taken for the sprained leg, and the mean of five maximal trials was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
The Biodex isokinetic dynamometer was used for assessment. During isokinetic testing of the subtalar joint, participants were in the seated position, with footwear on. Measurements were taken for the sprained leg, and the mean of five maximal trials was used for analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
Two surface electrodes and a ground electrode were used for assessment. Measurements were taken for the sprained leg, during isokinetic testing of the ankle dorsiflexor muscles, at 30°/sec speed, with the Biodex dynamometer. Normalized values of the electromyographic (EMG) signals were used for analysis, and EMG activity during maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the anterior tibialis muscle was used as the reference value for normalization.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
Two surface electrodes and a ground electrode were used for assessment. Measurements were taken for the sprained leg, during isokinetic testing of the ankle dorsiflexor muscles, at 120°/sec speed, with the Biodex dynamometer. Normalized values of the electromyographic (EMG) signals were used for analysis, and EMG activity during maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the anterior tibialis muscle was used as the reference value for normalization.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
Two surface electrodes and a ground electrode were used for assessment. Measurements were taken for the sprained leg, during isokinetic testing of the ankle plantar flexor muscles, at 30°/sec speed, with the Biodex dynamometer. Normalized values of the electromyographic (EMG) signals were used for analysis, and EMG activity during maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the peroneus longus muscle was used as the reference value for normalization.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
Two surface electrodes and a ground electrode were used for assessment. Measurements were taken for the sprained leg, during isokinetic testing of the ankle plantar flexor muscles, at 120°/sec speed, with the Biodex dynamometer. Normalized values of the electromyographic (EMG) signals were used for analysis, and EMG activity during maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the peroneus longus muscle was used as the reference value for normalization.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
Two surface electrodes and a ground electrode were used for assessment. Measurements were taken for the sprained leg, during isokinetic testing of the foot evertor muscles, at 30°/sec speed, with the Biodex dynamometer. Normalized values of the electromyographic (EMG) signals were used for analysis, and EMG activity during maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the peroneus longus muscle was used as the reference value for normalization.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
Two surface electrodes and a ground electrode were used for assessment. Measurements were taken for the sprained leg, during isokinetic testing of the foot evertor muscles, at 120°/sec speed, with the Biodex dynamometer. Normalized values of the electromyographic (EMG) signals were used for analysis, and EMG activity during maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the peroneus longus muscle was used as the reference value for normalization.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
Two surface electrodes and a ground electrode were used for assessment. Measurements were taken for the sprained leg, during isokinetic testing of the foot invertor muscles, at 30°/sec speed, with the Biodex dynamometer. Normalized values of the electromyographic (EMG) signals were used for analysis, and EMG activity during maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the anterior tibialis muscle was used as the reference value for normalization.
Time frame: Baseline, after the completion of training (follow-up 1), and eight weeks after the completion of training (follow-up 2)
Two surface electrodes and a ground electrode were used for assessment. Measurements were taken for the sprained leg, during isokinetic testing of the foot invertor muscles, at 120°/sec speed, with the Biodex dynamometer. Normalized values of the electromyographic (EMG) signals were used for analysis, and EMG activity during maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the anterior tibialis muscle was used as the reference value for normalization.
Time frame: Twelve months after the completion of training
Lazaros Lazarou
Other
Effects of Supervised Balance and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Training After Lateral Ligament Sprains of the Ankle
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04999254
Ankle Injuries, Ankle Sprains
Reims, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06469099
Ankle Injuries, Ankle Sprains
Netanya, Israel
View Trial DetailsNCT05090423
Ankle Injuries, Ankle Sprains
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT06866613
Ankle Injuries, Ankle Sprains
Siemensstr, Bonn, Germany
View Trial Details