Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03080246

Effects of Strength Training on Musculoskeletal Overuse Injuries in Female Runners

The purpose of this study is to look at the effect of strength training in preventing overuse injuries in female runners

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Wake Forest University

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27109, United States

About this study

This randomized clinical trial will compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on: (1) injury rates in female runners during the 9 month intervention period, and for 9 months after completing the intervention, and (2) on the potential mechanisms of injury including strength, joint and tissue loading, and psychosocial factors.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female civilian runners between 18-60 years old
  • Run at least 5 miles per week for the past 6 months
  • No overuse injuries in the past 6 months
  • Plan to stay in the area for the next year and a half
  • Live less than 30 miles from Wake Forest University or High Point University

Exclusion criteria

  • Male
  • Under age 18 and over age 60
  • Chronic diseases, orthopedic conditions, past anterior cruciate ligament tears
  • Currently pregnant or planning to conceive within the next 18 months
  • Observed by study staff as unwilling to attend testing/intervention sessions
  • Observed by study staff as unwilling to communicate via telephone and email regularly with study personnel
  • Participated in formal strength training in the past 6 months
  • Current active military or active military reserve

Treatment and study plan

Strength Training Exercise

Behavioral

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Overuse Injury (Physical Exam/Injury Report Form)

    Time frame: Month 18

    To compare the effects of a 9-month strength training program to a control group on the incidence of overuse, lower extremity, running injuries in female adult recreational and competitive runners during and 9 months subsequent to the training period.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lower Extremity Muscular Strength (HUMAC norm isokinetic dynamometer)

    Time frame: Months 0, 9, and 18

    To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on lower extremity muscular strength at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention.

  2. Biomechanical Joint Moments (3D kinematic and kinetic data collected by 6-camera motion capture gait analysis)

    Time frame: Month 0, 9, and 18

    To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on hip, knee, and ankle joint moments during running at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention.

  3. Biomechanical Joint Forces (3D kinematic and kinetic data collected by 6-camera motion capture gait analysis)

    Time frame: Month 0, 9, and 18

    To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on knee and ankle compressive and shear bone-on-bone joint forces during running at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention.

  4. Biomechanical Joint Tissue Loading (3D kinematic and kinetic data collected by 6-camera motion capture gait analysis)

    Time frame: Month 0, 9, and 18

    To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on joint tissue loading during running at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention.

  5. Self-Efficacy (Adherence Self-Efficacy Questionnaire)

    Time frame: Months 0, 9, and 18

    To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on performance self-efficacy at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention

  6. Quality of Life (SF-12 Health Related Quality of Life Survey)

    Time frame: Months 0, 9, and 18

    To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on health-related quality of life at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention

  7. Quality of Life (Satisfaction with Life Scale)

    Time frame: Months 0, 9, and 18

    To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on health-related quality of life at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention

  8. Quality of Life (Positive and Negative Affect Scale)

    Time frame: Months 0, 9, and 18

    To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on health-related quality of life at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention

  9. Quality of Life (State Trait Anxiety Inventory-S Scale)

    Time frame: Months 0, 9, and 18

    To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on health-related quality of life at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention

  10. Quality of Life (Visual Analog Pain Scale)

    Time frame: Months 0, 9, and 18

    To compare the effects of 9-months of strength training to a control group on health-related quality of life at the conclusion and 9 months subsequent to completion of the intervention

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Other

Collaborators

  • U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command

Registry information

Acronym: STARS

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Mar 15, 2017
Registry last updated
May 12, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.