Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07717034

Effects of Sensory Integration Training on Static Standing Balance in Older Adults

Balance impairment is a common problem among adults aged 60 years and older due to age-related decline in the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems. These impairments increase the risk of falls, reduce mobility, and compromise functional independence and quality of life. Conventional balance training is commonly used to improve postural stability; however, the additional benefits of sensory integration training remain unclear.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effect of sensory integration training combined with conventional balance training on static standing balance in older adults with a moderate risk of falls. Twenty-eight participants aged 60 years and above will be recruited and randomly allocated into an experimental group (n=14) and a control group (n=14). Experimental group will receive sesnory integration training and control group will receive conventional balance training three times per week for six weeks.

Balance performance will be assessed before and after the intervention using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), and Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB). Data will be analyzed using paired-sample t-tests for within-group comparisons and independent-sample t-tests for between-group comparisons. Statistical significance will be set at p<0.05.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

60 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Foundation University College of Physical Therapy

Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan

About this study

Balance impairment is one of the leading causes of falls among older adults and is associated with reduced mobility, impaired postural control, functional dependence, and decreased quality of life. Aging results in progressive deterioration of the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems, reducing the ability to effectively integrate sensory information required for maintaining balance. Consequently, older adults become increasingly vulnerable to falls and fall-related injuries.

Conventional balance training is widely used in rehabilitation to improve postural stability. Sensory integration training is an intervention that specifically challenges the central nervous system to effectively process and reweight sensory information from visual, vestibular, and somatosensory inputs under different environmental conditions. Although previous studies have demonstrated improvements in balance following sensory integration training, evidence regarding its additional benefit over conventional balance training remains limited.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of sensory integration training combined with conventional balance training in improving static standing balance among older adults with a moderate risk of falls.

Twenty-eight participants aged 60 years or older who meet the eligibility criteria will be enrolled after providing written informed consent. Participants will be randomly allocated into either an experimental group (n=14) or a control group (n=14) using simple randomization. Experimental groups will receive sensory integration training and control group will receive conventional balance training for six weeks, with three treatment sessions per week.

Outcome assessments will be conducted at baseline and immediately after completion of the six-week intervention. Static standing balance will be evaluated using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), and Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB). These validated outcome measures will assess functional balance, postural stability, and sensory integration during standing.

Balance impairment is one of the leading causes of falls among older adults and is associated with reduced mobility, impaired postural control, functional dependence, and decreased quality of life. Aging results in progressive deterioration of the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems, reducing the ability to effectively integrate sensory information required for maintaining balance. Consequently, older adults become increasingly vulnerable to falls and fall-related injuries.

Conventional balance training is widely used in rehabilitation to improve postural stability. Sensory integration training is an intervention that specifically challenges the central nervous system to effectively process and reweight sensory information from visual, vestibular, and somatosensory inputs under different environmental conditions. Although previous studies have demonstrated improvements in balance following sensory integration training, evidence regarding its additional benefit over conventional balance training remains limited.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of sensory integration training combined with conventional balance training in improving static standing balance among older adults with a moderate risk of falls.

Twenty-eight participants aged 60 years or older who meet the eligibility criteria will be enrolled after providing written informed consent. Participants will be randomly allocated into either an experimental group (n=14) or a control group (n=14) using simple randomization. Both groups will receive conventional balance training for six weeks, with three treatment sessions per week. In addition, the experimental group will receive sensory integration training consisting of progressively challenging balance exercises performed under altered visual, vestibular, and somatosensory conditions.

Outcome assessments will be conducted at baseline and immediately after completion of the six-week intervention. Static standing balance will be evaluated using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), and Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB). These validated outcome measures will assess functional balance, postural stability, and sensory integration during standing.

Statistical analyses will be performed using SPSS software. Descriptive statistics will summarize participant characteristics. Data normality will be assessed prior to inferential analysis. Paired-sample t-tests will be used to compare pre- and post-intervention outcomes within each group, while independent-sample t-tests will compare changes between groups. Statistical significance will be established at a p-value of less than 0.05.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age above 60.
  • Both Genders.
  • Able to understand and follow command.
  • Berg balance score lies between 21-40.

Exclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed vestibular and neurological conditions.
  • Orthopedic Conditions i.e., Recent fractures or surgeries, cervical spine issues or severe OA
  • Severe visual or auditory deficit

Treatment and study plan

sensory integration training with conventional balance training

Procedure

The experimental group participated in a structured six-week intervention program consisting exclusively of sensory integration training. Participants attended three supervised sessions per week. Each session included three repetitions of the exercises, with participants allowed a rest period of 30 to 60 seconds between repetitions to prevent fatigue and maintain the quality of each movement. Over the entire six-week period, participants completed a total of 18 supervised sessions.

conventional balance training

Procedure

The control group participated in a structured six-week intervention program consisting exclusively of conventional balance training. Participants attended three supervised sessions per week. Each session included three repetitions of the exercises, with participants allowed a rest period of 30 to 60 seconds between repetitions to prevent fatigue and maintain the quality of each movement. Over the entire six-week period, participants completed a total of 18 supervised sessions.

Primary outcomes

  1. Balance

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    The Berg balance scale serves to objectively evaluate a patient's capacity to maintain safe equilibrium throughout a sequence of standardized activities. It comprises 14 components, with each component featuring five levels of scoring ranging from 0 to 4.

    Score range between 0-56. 0-20 means significant balance problems 21-40 moderate balance problem 41-56 independent with good balance

  2. Balance

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    The balance error scoring system was used. Score ranges:

    • 0-10 Excellent
    • 11-15 Good
    • 16-20 Average
    • 21-30 Below Average
    • >30 Significant Balance Impairments
  3. Balance

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance was used

    Score Ranges:

    • 120 Seconds (Normal Balance Performance)
    • 100-119 Seconds (Mild Balance Impairment)
    • 80-99 Seconds (Moderate Balance Impairment, Increased Risk of Instability and Falls)
    • < 80 Seconds (Significant Balance Impairment, High Risk of Falls)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Foundation University Islamabad

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jul 21, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 21, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.