Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02187640

Effects of Self-administered Acupressure in Psychiatric Patients With Constipation

This study is to evaluate the effects of self-administered acupressure therapy for psychiatric in-patients with constipation

Two main research questions include:

1. What are the effects of the standardized self-administered acupressure program on reducing those adult psychiatric patients' symptoms of constipation? 2. What are the psychiatric patients' (participants') perceived benefits and limitations of self-administered acupressure on management of their constipation?

In this study, the participants who met the study criteria and completed the baseline measurement would be randomly assigned into either the self-administered acupressure program, or a sham control group who receive a placebo, non-acupoint pressure. The null hypotheses of this study are:

1. There is no significant difference between the acupressure and sham group immediately and/or two weeks after the completion of intervention on patients' symptom severity of constipation; and 2. There is no significant difference between the acupressure and sham group on patients' perceived quality of life at immediately and two weeks after treatment completion.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1 / Phase 2

Primary location

One Regional Mental Hospital

Tuenmen, New Territories, Hong Kong

About this study

Main outcomes of this study include the Constipation Assessment Scale (CAS), Patient Assessment Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAC-QoL), and the socio-demographic and clinical data collected by a trained assessor who was blind to the intervention assignment of the participants. These data would be measured at recruitment (baseline) and immediately (Post-test 1) and two weeks (Post-test 2) after completion of the 10-day intervention. Qualitative focus group interview data would be collected after Post-test 2 .

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

of psychiatric in-patients are:

  • Hong Kong Chinese residents, aged 18 to 64 years;
  • satisfied with Rome III diagnostic criteria for constipation; and
  • mentally stable and competent for self-care and learning acupressure, as recommended by their attending psychiatrists.

Exclusion criteria

of those in-patients are:

  • anatomical and physiological disorders of gastrointestinal tract such as malrotation, fistula and colonic neuropathies;
  • metabolic and endocrine diseases;
  • lead poisoning and vitamin D intoxication;
  • previous training in acupressure;
  • physical disability involved the upper limbs;
  • planned surgery undergoing during study period; and
  • pregnancy.

Treatment and study plan

self-administered acupressure

Behavioral

Self-administered acupressure: In order to ensure the compliance of treatment, they would apply this intervention according to the acupressure group protocol once per day in groups with one trained research nurse's instructions and supervision .

Other names: Self-help acupressure therapy

Sham Control Group

Behavioral

Sham intervention: Patients received similar aupressure intervention on the non-acupoints.

Primary outcomes

  1. Constipation Assessment Scale

    Time frame: Baseline (0 week; before start of intervention)

    The 8-item Constipation Assessment Scale is an universal measurement tool for symptom severity of constipation in a wide variety of acute and chronic diseases and rated on a 3-point likert scale, ranging from '0= no problem', 1= some problem', and '2= severe problem'. A higher total score will indicate the more severe condition of one's constipation.

  2. Constipation Assessment Scale

    Time frame: Fifth weeks (i.e., immediately after completion of the 10-day intervention)

    The 8-item Constipation Assessment Scale is an universal measurement tool for symptom severity of constipation in a wide variety of acute and chronic diseases and rated on a 3-point likert scale, ranging from '0= no problem', 1= some problem', and '2= severe problem'. A higher total score will indicate the more severe condition of one's constipation.

  3. Constipation Assessment Scale

    Time frame: Seventh week (i.e., two weeks after completion of the intervention)

    The 8-item Constipation Assessment Scale is an universal measurement tool for symptom severity of constipation in a wide variety of acute and chronic diseases and rated on a 3-point likert scale, ranging from '0= no problem', 1= some problem', and '2= severe problem'. A higher total score will indicate the more severe condition of one's constipation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Assessment Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline (0 week; before start of intervention)

    The Patient Assessment Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire for assessment of the magnitude and degree of interference associated with constipation symptomatology. The scale is composed of 28 items categorized into four subscales, including dissatisfaction (5 items), physical discomfort (4 items), psychosocial discomfort (8 items), and worries and concerns (11 items). Subjects rate each item on a 5-pont likert scale, ranging from '0 = none of the time or not at all to 4 = all of the time or extremely'. The overall and subscale scores can range from 0 to 4, with a lower total score indicating a better health-related quality of life.

  2. Patient Assessment Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire

    Time frame: Fifth week (i.e., immediately after completion of the 10-day intervention)

    The Patient Assessment Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire for assessment of the magnitude and degree of interference associated with constipation symptomatology. The scale is composed of 28 items categorized into four subscales, including dissatisfaction (5 items), physical discomfort (4 items), psychosocial discomfort (8 items), and worries and concerns (11 items). Subjects rate each item on a 5-pont likert scale, ranging from '0 = none of the time or not at all to 4 = all of the time or extremely'. The overall and subscale scores can range from 0 to 4, with a lower total score indicating a better health-related quality of life.

  3. Patient Assessment Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire

    Time frame: Seventh week (i.e., two weeks after completion of the 10-day intervention)

    The Patient Assessment Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire is a self-administered questionnaire for assessment of the magnitude and degree of interference associated with constipation symptomatology. The scale is composed of 28 items categorized into four subscales, including dissatisfaction (5 items), physical discomfort (4 items), psychosocial discomfort (8 items), and worries and concerns (11 items). Subjects rate each item on a 5-pont likert scale, ranging from '0 = none of the time or not at all to 4 = all of the time or extremely'. The overall and subscale scores can range from 0 to 4, with a lower total score indicating a better health-related quality of life.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomised Controlled Trial of Self-administered Acupressure in Adult Psychiatric Patients With Constipation

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Jul 11, 2014
Registry last updated
Aug 19, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.