Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07007650

Effects of Ropivacaine Concentrations on Prolonged Labor Analgesia

With the changes in medical models and improvements in people's quality of life, parturients have higher demands for childbirth, making the alleviation and elimination of labor pain an important aspect of modern obstetrics. Intrathecal labor analgesia has been widely adopted in clinical practice to relieve pain. However, current studies mainly focus on parturients who are just beginning to receive labor analgesia, while for those experiencing prolonged analgesia, medical institutions still use traditional formulations, lacking relevant guidelines or expert consensus. In such cases, prolonged waiting and anxiety may lower the pain tolerance of parturients, leading to an increased need for higher concentrations of local anesthetics. To address this clinical gap, this study aims to explore the effects of different concentrations of ropivacaine in prolonged labor analgesia and has designed a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) to provide evidence for improving the analgesic regimen for this group of parturients.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Chengdu Jinjiang District Women & Children Health Hospital,

Chengdu, Sichuan, 610011, China

Location contact

jianjun mao, BS

CONTACT

[email protected]

+8615008460156

About this study

Background:

With changes in medical models and improvements in quality of life, parturients have higher expectations for childbirth, making the alleviation and elimination of labor pain an important aspect of modern obstetrics. Intrathecal labor analgesia is widely used in clinical practice to relieve labor pain. However, studies on prolonged labor analgesia, especially following the replacement of the first analgesic pump, are scarce. Medical institutions often continue to use traditional analgesic formulations without relevant guidelines or expert consensus. Prolonged analgesia may reduce pain tolerance in parturients, possibly necessitating adjustments in local anesthetic concentration to improve analgesic effectiveness. Given the clinical research gap, this study aims to explore the effects of different concentrations of ropivacaine on prolonged labor analgesia and its impact on maternal and neonatal safety.

Objective:

To investigate the effects and maternal-neonatal safety of using different concentrations of ropivacaine for prolonged labor analgesia, providing clinical evidence for optimizing labor analgesia regimens.

Methods:

This single-center prospective randomized controlled study will collect clinical data from parturients receiving labor analgesia at Chengdu Jinjiang District Maternal and Child Health Hospital from May to August 2025. Participants meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be included. Following the replacement of the first analgesic pump, parturients will be randomly assigned to receive one of two ropivacaine concentration regimens (Group H: 0.12% ropivacaine; Group N: 0.1% ropivacaine). Data collection will include demographic information, pain scores, labor-related parameters, neonatal outcomes, and adverse reactions.

Interventions:

  • Group H: 0.12% ropivacaine + 0.5µg/ml sufentanil
  • Group N: 0.1% ropivacaine + 0.5µg/ml sufentanil Following the replacement of the first analgesic pump, parturients will receive the respective ropivacaine concentration formulation, with pain relief effects and labor-related indicators assessed at specified intervals.

Primary Outcome:

Pain scores at different time points (T0: at pump replacement; T1: 0.5 hours after pump replacement; T2: 1 hour after pump replacement; T3: at full cervical dilation or during transition to cesarean section).

Secondary Outcomes:

  • Labor-related indicators: Duration of first, second, and third stages of labor, blood loss, rate of instrumental delivery, mode of delivery (vaginal/cesarean).
  • Neonatal indicators: Neonatal weight, Apgar scores at 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 10 minutes.
  • Adverse reactions: Hypotension, nausea/vomiting, intrapartum fever (T≥38.0℃).

Hypothesis:

Different concentrations of ropivacaine for prolonged intrathecal labor analgesia will have varying effects on pain control and maternal-neonatal safety, with higher concentration ropivacaine (0.12%) likely being more effective in pain relief, while both concentrations are expected to show no significant difference in maternal and neonatal safety.

Ethics Approval:

This study has received approval from the ethics committee of Chengdu Jinjiang District Maternal and Child Health Hospital (Approval Number: 202312). All participants must sign an informed consent form to ensure the respect of participant rights and data confidentiality. The study will strictly adhere to relevant ethical standards and legal regulations to protect participant safety and privacy.

Funding:

This study is funded by the following projects:

  • Chengdu Medical Research Project (No. 2023465)
  • Chengdu Medical Research Project (No. 2022548)
  • Chengdu Medical Research Project (No. 2023304)

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • ASA II
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • No contraindications for epidural puncture and voluntarily accepting labor analgesia
  • Maternal participants changing the first pump fluid

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindications for epidural labor analgesia
  • Serious heart, brain, liver, or kidney diseases
  • Mental abnormalities
  • Neurological diseases
  • Maternal request for management of breakthrough pain before changing the pump fluid

Treatment and study plan

High-concentration Ropivacaine

Drug

After the first pump fluid is depleted, switch to 0.12% ropivacaine to continue labor analgesia.

Low concentration ropivacaine group

Drug

After the first pump fluid is depleted, switch to 0.12% ropivacaine to continue labor analgesia.

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score

    Time frame: From pump replacement to the end of labor analgesia.

    The pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at four time points:

    T0 (at the time of pump fluid change) T1 (0.5 hours after the pump fluid change) T2 (1 hour after the pump fluid change) T3 (when full cervical dilation is achieved/in case of emergency cesarean section).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Modified Bromage score

    Time frame: From pump replacement to the end of labor analgesia.

    The level of motor blockade will be assessed using the Modified Bromage Score at four time points:

    T0 (at the time of pump fluid replacement) T1 (0.5 hours after the pump fluid replacement) T2 (1 hour after the pump fluid replacement) T3 (at full cervical dilation/in case of emergency cesarean section)

  2. Mode of delivery

    Time frame: At the end of delivery

    The mode of delivery will be recorded (vaginal birth/cesarean section).

  3. Neonatal Apgar score

    Time frame: 10 minutes after the delivery of the fetus

    The Apgar Score will be recorded for the newborn at 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 10 minutes after delivery.

  4. nausea and vomiting questionnaire

    Time frame: From pump replacement to the end of labor analgesia.

    Nausea and vomiting will be recorded if they occur after changing the infusion until the end of delivery.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Bo Liu, MS

CONTACT

[email protected]

+8618502846036

Fei Jia, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+8618581877655

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chengdu Jinjiang Maternity and Child Health Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Different Concentrations of Ropivacaine on Prolonged Labor Analgesia

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jun 6, 2025
Registry last updated
Jun 6, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.