Rhinopharyngeal clearance
ProcedureAt the end of the expiratory time, the child's mouth was closed by the hand of the researcher (raising the lower jaw), leading the child to perform a nasal aspiration maneuver.
NCT Number: NCT02460614
The purpose of this study is to compare the immediate effects of retrograde rhinopharyngeal clearance with nasopharyngeal aspiration in children admitted with acute viral bronchiolitis. The investigators selected children, up to 12 months old, admitted for acute viral bronchiolitis. Patients were divided in aspiration group (AG), submitted to nasopharyngeal aspiration, and clearance group (CG), submitted to retrograde rhinopharyngeal clearance with physiological solution (0.9%) instillation (RRC) technique. In both groups children were evaluated three times in the same day in order to verify cardiorespiratory parameters, clinical score of respiratory dysfunction and adverse effects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeUp to 12 month
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Children up to 12 months old, admitted for acute viral acute viral bronchiolitis were selected. All children participating in the study should be in the first 48 hours of hospitalization. Patients were divided in aspiration group (AG), submitted to nasopharyngeal aspiration, and clearance group (CG), submitted to retrograde rhinopharyngeal clearance (RRC) technique with physiological solution (0.9%) instillation. In both groups children were evaluated three times in the same day (data collection 1 (C1) - performed early in the morning; data collecting 2 (C2) - performed in the early afternoon; and data collecting 3 (C3) - performed in the evening). In each data collection, cardiorespiratory parameters and clinical score of respiratory dysfunction were evaluated before procedures (T0), 10 minutes after (T1) and 30 minutes after (T2). Adverse effects were evaluated during the whole day of the study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
At the end of the expiratory time, the child's mouth was closed by the hand of the researcher (raising the lower jaw), leading the child to perform a nasal aspiration maneuver.
A sterile aspiration catheter was connected to an extension and carefully introduced into the nasal cavity of the patient.
0.9% saline consists of physiological solution and was instilled in both experimental groups.
Time frame: 30 minutes
Time frame: 30 minutes
Time frame: 1 day
Time frame: 1 day
Time frame: 30 minutes
Time frame: 30 minutes
Time frame: 30 minutes
Time frame: 30 minutes
Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Other
Comparison Between Rhinopharyngeal Retrograde Clearance and Nasopharyngeal Aspiration in Children With Acute Viral Bronchiolitis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01777347
Acute Viral Bronchiolitis, Bronchial Diseases
Bondy, France
View Trial DetailsNCT01873144
Acute Viral Bronchiolitis, Bronchial Diseases
Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07682844
Acute Viral Bronchiolitis, Bronchial Diseases
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT03976895
Acute Viral Bronchiolitis, Bronchial Diseases
Bron, France
View Trial Details