Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03724461

Effects of Resistance Training With High vs. Light-moderate Loads on Muscle-tendon Function in the Elderly

There are no unbiased studies that have analyzed the effects of resistance training with traditional, heavy versus light-moderate loads on muscle, tendon and bone in elderly people.

The purpose of the present study is to assess the effects on muscle mass and function, tendon and bone of two different training intensities, light-moderate vs. heavy load, in people older than 65 years old.

The study will be carried out with a randomized controlled design. Participants will perform single training sessions and a 12-wk dynamic resistance training program on the knee extensors with different training intensities on each leg. One leg will train with heavy loads and the other one will train with light-moderate loads, but matching the load x repetitions performed by the contralateral side.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Laboratorio de Actividad Física y Función Muscular. Campus de la Fábrica de Armas. Avda. Carlos III s/n

Toledo, 45071, Spain

About this study

The decline in muscle function provoked by the aging process and frailty are directly related to decreases in mobility and the ability to perform the so called "daily life activities". Resistance training is especially useful at this stage, given that it is an effective and widely applicable intervention to control and revert sarcopenia, and the deterioration of tendon and bone function. Despite of the effectiveness of heavy load resistance training, a controversy has arisen in the last years about the effects of lower load resistance training programs to achieve similar adaptations. This is because most of the studies that have compared light-moderate versus heavy load programs did not control the differences in total training load, measured as the overall mechanical work performed during the training program. Therefore, there are no unbiased studies that have analyzed the effects of resistance training with traditional, heavy versus light-moderate loads on muscle, tendon and bone in elderly people.

The purpose of the present study is to assess the effects on muscle mass and function, tendon and bone of two different training intensities, light-moderate vs. heavy load, in people older than 65 years old.

The studies will be carried out with a crossover (acute training sessions) and randomized controlled design (longitudinal training intervention). Participants will perform single training sessions with each resistance training intensity and a 12-wk dynamic resistance training program on the knee extensors with different training intensities on each leg. One leg will train with heavy loads and the other one will train with light-moderate loads, but matching the load x repetitions performed by the contralateral side. Muscle adaptations (EMG, muscle size and architecture), tendon mechanical properties, bone mineral density, blood parameters and life quality will be analyzed before and after the cessation of the training program.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 65 years and older,
  • non-institutionalized
  • passed physical examination including physical function assessment (no frailty status; SPPB >7 points)

Exclusion criteria

  • Neurological, musculoskeletal, or other disorder that would preclude completing resistance training and all performance tests
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, unstable or exercise-induced angina pectoris or myocardial ischemia or any other medical condition that would interfere with testing or increase one's risk of complications during exercise.
  • History of regular resistance exercise during the previous 3 years
  • Knee prosthesis

Treatment and study plan

High Intensity resistance training (12 weeks)

Behavioral

High intensity resistance training (80% of 1 repetition maximum), 2 d/wk (Longitudinal)

Other names: HIT

Light-moderate intensity resistance training (12 weeks)

Behavioral

Light-moderate intensity resistance training (40% of 1 repetition maximum), 2 d/wk (Longitudinal)

Other names: LIT

Control (12 weeks)

Behavioral

No resistance training during the intervention period.

Other names: CON

One High Intensity resistance training session

Behavioral

High intensity resistance training, 1 training session

Other names: HIT (Acute)

One Light-moderate intensity resistance training session

Behavioral

Light-moderate intensity resistance training, 1 training session

Other names: LIT (Acute)

Primary outcomes

  1. Acute change in muscle size (cross sectional area, cm2)

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training session

    Ultrasound-based determination quadriceps muscle size and architecture.

  2. Change in muscle size (cross sectional area, cm2)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

    Ultrasound-based determination quadriceps muscle size and architecture.

  3. Acute change in muscle function (N)

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training session

    Force-velocity profile of the single-leg press exercise

  4. Change in muscle function (N)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

    Force-velocity profile of the single-leg press exercise

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in patellar tendon stiffness (N/mm)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

    Ultrasound and force-based measures of tendon mechanical properties.

  2. Acute change in patellar tendon stiffness (N/mm)

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training session

    Ultrasound and force-based measures of tendon mechanical properties.

  3. Change in muscle mass (kg)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

    Lean mass determined by Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

  4. Change in bone mass (g)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

    Bone mineral content determined by Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry

  5. Acute change in muscle excitation (mV)

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training session

    Electromyographic activity of the knee extensor and flexor muscles during strength assessment and training

  6. Change in muscle excitation (mV)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

    Electromyographic activity of the knee extensor and flexor muscles during strength assessment and training

  7. Change in physical function

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

    Short Physical Performance Battery

  8. Blood analysis: Acute change in oxidative stress

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training session

    Carbonyl proteins (plasma concentration)

  9. Blood analysis: Change in oxidative stress

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

    Carbonyl proteins (plasma concentration)

  10. Blood analysis: Acute change in Inflammation

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training session (Acute)

    Interleukin 6, Tumoral necrosis factor Alpha, C reactive protein (plasma concentration)

  11. Blood analysis: Change in inflammation

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

    Interleukin 6, Tumoral necrosis factor Alpha, C reactive protein (plasma concentration)

  12. Blood analysis: Acute change in anabolic processes

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training session

    Testosterone, growth hormone, Insulin growth factor-1 (plasma concentration)

  13. Blood analysis: Change in anabolic processes

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

    Testosterone, growth hormone, Insulin growth factor-1 (plasma concentration)

  14. Blood analysis: Acute change in catabolic processes

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training session

    Cortisol, Creatin kinase (plasma concentration)

  15. Blood analysis: Change in catabolic processes

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12

    Cortisol, Creatin kinase (plasma concentration)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Castilla-La Mancha

Other

Collaborators

  • Biomedical Research Networking Center on Frailty and Healthy Aging (CIBERFES)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Oct 30, 2018
Registry last updated
Jun 16, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.