Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Laboratorio de Actividad Física y Función Muscular. Campus de la Fábrica de Armas. Avda. Carlos III s/n
Toledo, 45071, Spain
NCT Number: NCT03724461
There are no unbiased studies that have analyzed the effects of resistance training with traditional, heavy versus light-moderate loads on muscle, tendon and bone in elderly people.
The purpose of the present study is to assess the effects on muscle mass and function, tendon and bone of two different training intensities, light-moderate vs. heavy load, in people older than 65 years old.
The study will be carried out with a randomized controlled design. Participants will perform single training sessions and a 12-wk dynamic resistance training program on the knee extensors with different training intensities on each leg. One leg will train with heavy loads and the other one will train with light-moderate loads, but matching the load x repetitions performed by the contralateral side.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me65 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Toledo, 45071, Spain
The decline in muscle function provoked by the aging process and frailty are directly related to decreases in mobility and the ability to perform the so called "daily life activities". Resistance training is especially useful at this stage, given that it is an effective and widely applicable intervention to control and revert sarcopenia, and the deterioration of tendon and bone function. Despite of the effectiveness of heavy load resistance training, a controversy has arisen in the last years about the effects of lower load resistance training programs to achieve similar adaptations. This is because most of the studies that have compared light-moderate versus heavy load programs did not control the differences in total training load, measured as the overall mechanical work performed during the training program. Therefore, there are no unbiased studies that have analyzed the effects of resistance training with traditional, heavy versus light-moderate loads on muscle, tendon and bone in elderly people.
The purpose of the present study is to assess the effects on muscle mass and function, tendon and bone of two different training intensities, light-moderate vs. heavy load, in people older than 65 years old.
The studies will be carried out with a crossover (acute training sessions) and randomized controlled design (longitudinal training intervention). Participants will perform single training sessions with each resistance training intensity and a 12-wk dynamic resistance training program on the knee extensors with different training intensities on each leg. One leg will train with heavy loads and the other one will train with light-moderate loads, but matching the load x repetitions performed by the contralateral side. Muscle adaptations (EMG, muscle size and architecture), tendon mechanical properties, bone mineral density, blood parameters and life quality will be analyzed before and after the cessation of the training program.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
High intensity resistance training (80% of 1 repetition maximum), 2 d/wk (Longitudinal)
Other names: HIT
Light-moderate intensity resistance training (40% of 1 repetition maximum), 2 d/wk (Longitudinal)
Other names: LIT
No resistance training during the intervention period.
Other names: CON
High intensity resistance training, 1 training session
Other names: HIT (Acute)
Light-moderate intensity resistance training, 1 training session
Other names: LIT (Acute)
Time frame: Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training session
Ultrasound-based determination quadriceps muscle size and architecture.
Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12
Ultrasound-based determination quadriceps muscle size and architecture.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training session
Force-velocity profile of the single-leg press exercise
Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12
Force-velocity profile of the single-leg press exercise
Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12
Ultrasound and force-based measures of tendon mechanical properties.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training session
Ultrasound and force-based measures of tendon mechanical properties.
Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12
Lean mass determined by Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12
Bone mineral content determined by Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training session
Electromyographic activity of the knee extensor and flexor muscles during strength assessment and training
Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12
Electromyographic activity of the knee extensor and flexor muscles during strength assessment and training
Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12
Short Physical Performance Battery
Time frame: Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training session
Carbonyl proteins (plasma concentration)
Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12
Carbonyl proteins (plasma concentration)
Time frame: Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training session (Acute)
Interleukin 6, Tumoral necrosis factor Alpha, C reactive protein (plasma concentration)
Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12
Interleukin 6, Tumoral necrosis factor Alpha, C reactive protein (plasma concentration)
Time frame: Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training session
Testosterone, growth hormone, Insulin growth factor-1 (plasma concentration)
Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12
Testosterone, growth hormone, Insulin growth factor-1 (plasma concentration)
Time frame: Change from baseline at 5 minutes after a training session
Cortisol, Creatin kinase (plasma concentration)
Time frame: Change from baseline to week 12
Cortisol, Creatin kinase (plasma concentration)
University of Castilla-La Mancha
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06556706
Aging, Atrophy
Montreal, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT03707145
Aging, Atrophy
Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT05744167
Aging, Atrophy
Kaunas, Lithuania
View Trial DetailsNCT05283486
Aging, Atrophy
Clearwater, Florida, United States
View Trial Details