Pregabalin
DrugCapsule, flexible dosing double-blind. Treatment duration is approximately 4 weeks titrated to 300-450 mg/day
NCT Number: NCT00883740
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the effect of Lyrica on Wake after sleep onset in subjects with fibromyalgia with sleep maintenance disturbance (on polysomnogram)
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Pfizer Investigational Site, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Capsule, flexible dosing double-blind. Treatment duration is approximately 4 weeks titrated to 300-450 mg/day
Capsule, flexible dosing double-blind. Treatment duration is approximately 4 weeks
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or Early Termination (ET)
WASO was the sum of wake time during sleep measured in epochs (30 seconds of polysomnography [PSG]) recording) after the onset of persistent sleep and prior to final awakening and wake time after sleep (the number of epochs after the final awakening until the end of PSG recording [i.e. awake epoch immediately prior to the end of the recording]) on 2 consecutive nights divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period.
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET
WTDS, as determined by PSG, was the total amount of time awake the participant experienced after the onset of persistent sleep and prior to the final awakening, or at the end of 8 hours of recording. WTDS was the sum of 2 consecutive nights of recordings divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period.
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET
WTAS, as determined by PSG, was the total amount of time awake after the final awakening until the end of the 8 hours. WTAS was the sum of 2 consecutive nights of recordings divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period.
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET
TST, as determined by PSG, was the number of non-wake epochs from the beginning of recording to the end of the recording. TST was the sum of 2 consecutive nights of recording divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period.
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET
SE, as determined by PSG, was the TST divided by the time in bed, multiplied by 100. The sum of 2 consecutive nights of recording divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period.
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET
NAASO 1, as determined by PSG, was the number of times there was a wake period of at least one epoch in duration. Each entry counted was separated by a Stage 2 epoch, Stage 3 and 4 epoch, or Stage rapid eye movement (REM) epoch. The sum of 2 consecutive nights of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period.
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET
NAASO 2, as determined by PSG, was the number of times that there was a wake period of at least two epochs in duration. Each entry counted was separated by a Stage 2 epoch, Stage 3 and 4 epoch, or Stage REM epoch. The sum of 2 consecutive nights of recording divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period.
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET
LPS, as determined by PSG, was the total number of epochs recorded on 2 consecutive nights divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period, from the beginning of the recording to the start of the first 20 consecutive non-wake epochs.
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET
WASO, as determined by PSG, was the wake time during sleep (number of wake epochs after the onset of persistent sleep and prior to final awakening) and wake time after sleep (the number of epochs after the final awakening until the end of PSG recording) on 2 consecutive nights divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period by each individual hour (8 hours total).
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET
WASO, as determined by PSG, was the sum of wake time during sleep (number of wake epochs after the onset of persistent sleep and prior to final awakening) and wake time after sleep (the number of epochs after the final awakening until the end of PSG recording) on 2 consecutive nights divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period by each individual quarter of the night (eight hours in 2 hour increments).
Time frame: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET
SWS, as determined by PSG, Stage 3 plus 4 sleep divided by TST times 100 was the percentage of TST. The sum of 2 consecutive nights of recording divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period.
Time frame: Week 1 (Baseline Intervention Period 1), Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 7 (Baseline Intervention Period 2) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET
MOS-SS, a participant rated instrument used to assess sleep quantity and quality over the previous week, was comprised of 12 items yielding 7 subscale scores and 2 index composite index scores. Sleep Disturbance subscale score (4 items): individual scores were transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range times 100) and ranged from 0 to 100; higher score indicated greater disturbance. Total score ranged=0 to 100; higher score indicates greater intensity of attribute. Change was score at week x minus score at baseline.
Time frame: Week 1 (Baseline Intervention Period 1), Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 7 (Baseline Intervention Period 2) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET
MOS-SS, a participant rated instrument used to assess sleep quantity and quality over the previous week, was compromised of 12 items yielding 7 subscale scores and 2 index composite index scores. Composite index included Sleep Problems Index II (9 items), scores ranged from 0 to 100; higher scores indicated greater sleep problems. Change was score at week x minus score at baseline.
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Each Intervention Period or ET
Sleep Quality as meassured by numeric rating scale (NRS), a participant rated scale 0 to 10, (0 = very poor sleep, 10 = excellent sleep). Weekly values were calculated as the average of the participants daily diary scores.
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Each Intervention Period or ET
LSO as reported on daily Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ), a participant reported subjective estimate of the amount of time to fall asleep after lights out. Weekly values were calculated as the average minutes reported on the participant's daily SSQ.
Time frame: Daily up to Day 73 or ET
Pain intensity as measured by NRS; a participant rated scale 0 to 10 (0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain possible). Weekly values were calculated as the average of the participants daily pain scores.
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Each Intervention Period or ET
sWASO as reported on daily SSQ, a participant reported subjective estimate of the total amount of time the participant was awake after initial sleep onset until final awakening. Weekly values were calculated as the average of the participant's daily SSQ values.
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Each Intervention Period or ET
sTST as reported on daily SSQ, a participant reported subjective estimate of the total amount of time the participant was asleep after lights out until final awakening. Weekly values were calculated as the average of the participants daily SSQ values.
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Industry
Effects Of Pregabalin On Sleep Maintenance In Subjects With Fibromyalgia Syndrome And Sleep Maintenance Disturbance: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled 2-Way Crossover Polysomnography Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01234675
Fibromyalgia, Mental Disorders
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03887000
Fibromyalgia, Mental Disorders
Clermont-Ferrand, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07614945
Agnosia, Chronic Pain
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06786845
Fibromyalgia, Inflammation
Uppsala, Sweden
View Trial Details