Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04743570

Effects of Peripherally Acting µ-opioid Receptor Antagonists on Acute Pancreatitis

This study will investigate the effect of peripheral acting opioid antagonist (PAMORA) on the disease course of patients with acute inflammation of the pancreas (acute pancreatitis). The study will be conducted by treating hospitalized patients with acute pancreatitis with a PAMORA (methylnaltrexone).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2 / Phase 3

Primary location

Mech-Sense, Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Jutland, Denmark

Loading trial locations.

About this study

In this study, the effects of peripheral acting µ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORA) on disease development and progression in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) will be investigated. Patients with AP will be administered Methylnaltrexone (Relistor®) intravenously. This medication is defined as the investigational product. Relistor® is approved and sold on the Danish marked for treatment of opioid-induced constipation. This PAMORA have not previously been investigated in patients with pancreatitis. The dose regimes for this study will be according to label. It has previously been shown, in patients with opioid-induced obstipation and healthy subjects, that opioid antagonism incl. PAMORA treatment increases gut motility, relaxes gastrointestinal sphincters, increases the intestinal water content and improves the immune response, without affecting analgesia. The affinity of PAMORAs to the µ-opioid receptors is much stronger than opioid analgesics. Therefore, they as antagonists have the potential to counteract the harmful effects of opioids on the gut mucosa, bacterial translocation and inflammation despite the high levels of exogenous opioids present in patients with pancreatitis. PAMORAs do not cross the blood-brain barrier and consequently do not interfere with analgesia or other central effects of opioids.

We hypothesize that treatment with the PAMORA methylnaltrexone will antagonize the harmful effects of opioids without reducing analgesia in patients with AP and hence reduce disease severity and improve clinical outcomes. If successful, this sub-study will for the first time document the effects of a targeted pharmacotherapy in AP with the potential benefit of improved patient outcomes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed informed consent before any study specific procedures
  • Able to read and understand Danish
  • Male or female age between 18 and 80 years
  • The researcher believes that the participant understands what the study entails, is capable of following instructions, can attend when needed, and is expected to complete the study
  • The investigator will ensure that fertile female participants have a negative pregnancy test before treatment initiation and use contraception during the study period. The following methods of contraception, if properly used, are generally considered reliable: oral contraceptives, patch contraceptives, injection contraceptives, vaginal contraceptive ring, intrauterine device, surgical sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation), vasectomized partner, double barrier (condom and pessary), or sexual abstinence. Methods of contraception will be documented in the source documents
  • At least two of the following criteria need to be fulfilled to establish a diagnosis of AP (according to the revised Atlanta criteria (16)): i) abdominal pain consistent with AP (acute onset of a persistent, severe, epigastric pain often radiating to the back); ii) serum amylase activity at least three times greater than the upper limit of normal; and iii) characteristic findings of AP on diagnostic imaging
  • Predicted moderate or severe AP based on 2 or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria upon admission

Exclusion criteria

  • Definitive chronic pancreatitis according to the M-ANNHEIM criteria
  • Known allergy towards study medication
  • Known or suspected major stenosis or perforation of the intestines
  • Known or suspected abdominal cancer (incl. intestine, pancreas and the biliary tree)
  • Pre-existing renal insufficiency (defined as habitual estimated glomerular filtration rate below 45)
  • Severe pre-existing comorbidities (assessed by investigator upon inclusion)
  • Severe non-pancreaticobiliary infections or sepsis caused by non-pancreaticobiliary disease
  • Child-Pugh class B or C liver cirrhosis
  • Females that are currently lactating

Treatment and study plan

placebo treatment

Drug

Active drug/placebo is given for the first 5 days of admission.

Methylnaltrexone treatment

Drug

Active drug/placebo is given for the first 5 days of admission.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pancreatitis activity scoring system

    Time frame: 48 hours after randomization

    Difference in Pancreatitis activity scoring system (PASS) score between the methylnaltrexone group and the placebo group. The PASS-score is a weighted score of presence of organ failure, number of criterias of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome fulfilled, abdominal pain (0-10), morphine equivalent dose (mg) and tolerance to solid food. Minimum value is 0 and higher score is equal to higher disease activity.

    Documentation for the PASS can be found on the following link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519418/

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pancreatitis activity scoring system

    Time frame: 24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit

    Difference PASS scores between subgroups

  2. Difference in assessments of circulating proinflammatory marker

    Time frame: 24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit

    C-Reactive Protein (mg/L)

  3. Difference in assessments of circulating pro- and anti-inflammatory markers

    Time frame: 24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit

    Interleukin-6, Interleukin-8, Interleukin-18, Tumor necrosis factor alpha, Cluster of Differentiation 163 (serum) (all measured in pg/mL)

  4. Intestinal permeability

    Time frame: From 48 to 72 hours after randomization

    Difference in intestinal permeability between subgroups using the oral polyethylene glycol 400/4000 test

  5. Intestinal motility

    Time frame: 5 (+/- 1 day) after randomization

    Difference in intestinal motility assessed by means of gut/colon transit using a CT-based radiopaque marker method between subgroups

  6. Pancreatic complications

    Time frame: Day 5 (+/- 1 day) after randomization

    Difference in pancreatic complications (e.g. edema, fluid collections and necrosis) assessed and quantified with contrast-enhanced CT

  7. Pain intensity

    Time frame: 24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit

    Difference between subgroups in pain intensity measured with the questionaire "modified Brief Pain Inventory short form" on visual analogue scale from 0-10 (0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain).

  8. Gut function (BSFS)

    Time frame: 24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit

    Difference between subgroups in gut function assessed by The Bristol Stool Form Scale for assessment of stool frequency as well as stool consistency (scale from 1-7, where 1 is firmeste and 7 is softest)

  9. Gut function (GSRS)

    Time frame: 24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit

    Difference between subgroups in gut function assessed by Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale which is a disease-specific instrument of 15 items combined into five symptom clusters depicting reflux, abdominal pain, indigestion, diarrhea and constipation. The GSRS has a seven-point graded Likert-type scale, where 1 represents absence of troublesome symptoms and 7 represents very troublesome symptoms.

  10. Quantification of analgesics

    Time frame: 24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit

    Difference between subgroups in given dose of analgesics (separated into opioids and non-opioids) based on name, administration route and dose

  11. Use of nutritional support

    Time frame: 24 hours after randomization and every 24 hours untill end of study at day 5 (after 120 hours) and again at the day 14 follow-up visit

    Difference between subgroups in the use of nutritional support with registration of the used of either oral nutrition, enteral or parenteral nutrition.

  12. Days of hospitalization

    Time frame: Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months or on the day of discharge which ever comes first

    Difference between subgroups in days of hospitalization and days on intensive ward

  13. Use of invasive treatment

    Time frame: Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months or on the day of discharge whichever comes first

    Difference between subgroups in use of invasive treatment (e.g. use of drain or surgery) measured in type and frequency of use

  14. Mortality

    Time frame: Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months or on the day of discharge whichever comes first

    Difference between subgroups in mortality rate

  15. Health resource utilization

    Time frame: Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months or on the day of discharge whichever comes first

    Difference in health resource utilization (measured in frequency and type of health services used (e.g. blood sample, MRI etc.) that can be converted into danish currency for economic analyses) between subgroups based on service codes (all services have unique service codes stored digitally).

  16. Disease severity

    Time frame: Observation period starts from day of randomization and ends after 12 months or on the day of discharge whichever comes first

    Disease severity classified by the revised Atlanta classification system in 3 levels; Mild, Moderate or Severe acute pancreatitis. (Mild acute pancreatitis, with no organ failure, local or systemic complications, Moderately severe acute pancreatitis is with presence of transient organ failure, local complications or exacerbation of co-morbid disease. Severe acute pancreatitis with persistent organ failure (>48 h).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Asbjørn Mohr Drewes

Other

Collaborators

  • Hvidovre University Hospital
  • Odense University Hospital
  • University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Peripherally Acting µ-opioid Receptor Antagonists on Acute Pancreatitis - An Investigator-initiated, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Feb 8, 2021
Registry last updated
Apr 21, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.