Effects of Oxytocin on Negative Symptoms and Social Cognition in Schizophrenia and Its Possible Mechanisms

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is a 30-items, 7-point rating scale, the 7 rating points represent increasing levels of psychopathology, 7 were chosen to constitute Positive Scale, 7 items for Negative Scale and the remaining 16 items for a General Psychopathology Scale. The scale scores range from 30 to 210, with higher scores indicating more severe psychotic symptoms.

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is a 30-items, 7-point rating scale, the 7 rating points represent increasing levels of psychopathology, 7 were chosen to constitute Positive Scale, 7 items for Negative Scale and the remaining 16 items for a General Psychopathology Scale. The scale scores range from 30 to 210, with higher scores indicating more severe psychotic symptoms.

The Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS) is used to assess negative symptoms, the CAINS is a 13-item interview-based assessment comprising a nine-item "motivation and pleasure" factor (items included recreation, social and vocational expected pleasure and motivation), and a four-item "expression" factor (items included vocal prosody, gestures, facial, and speech). All items were scored on a five-point scale from 0 (no impairment) to 4 (severe deficit).The scale scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more severe negative symptoms.

The Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS) is used to assess negative symptoms, the CAINS is a 13-item interview-based assessment comprising a nine-item "motivation and pleasure" factor (items included recreation, social and vocational expected pleasure and motivation), and a four-item "expression" factor (items included vocal prosody, gestures, facial, and speech). All items were scored on a five-point scale from 0 (no impairment) to 4 (severe deficit).The scale scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more severe negative symptoms.

The Gain versus Loss-Avoidance (GLA) task is a probabilistic reinforcement learning paradigm involving stimulus pairs in which choices resulted in reward or in loss avoidance.

The Gain versus Loss-Avoidance (GLA) task is a probabilistic reinforcement learning paradigm involving stimulus pairs in which choices resulted in reward or in loss avoidance.

The Chinese version of the TEPS contains 20 items, using a 6-point Likert scale (from 1 = very false for me to 6 = very true for me), and measures anticipatory pleasure and consummatory pleasure, with higher scores indicating better pleasure experience.

The Chinese version of the TEPS contains 20 items, using a 6-point Likert scale (from 1 = very false for me to 6 = very true for me), and measures anticipatory pleasure and consummatory pleasure, with higher scores indicating better pleasure experience.

The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) (Davis, 1983) measures participants' empathic tendencies, it is a 28-item self-report scale measuring empathy and consists of four subscales: perspective taking, fantasy, personal distress, and empathic concern. While the first two subscales index, cognitive empathy, the last two subscales index affective empathy, each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (does not describe me well) to 4 (describes me very well), and higher scores on the IRI-PT and the IRI-EC reflect greater cognitive and emotional empathy, respectively. In the Chinese version of the IRI, 6 items were deleted and 22 items remained (Chan, 1986) and it has been reported to have good reliability and validity in both normal and schizophrenic populations.

The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) (Davis, 1983) measures participants' empathic tendencies, it is a 28-item self-report scale measuring empathy and consists of four subscales: perspective taking, fantasy, personal distress, and empathic concern. While the first two subscales index, cognitive empathy, the last two subscales index affective empathy, each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (does not describe me well) to 4 (describes me very well), and higher scores on the IRI-PT and the IRI-EC reflect greater cognitive and emotional empathy, respectively. In the Chinese version of the IRI, 6 items were deleted and 22 items remained (Chan, 1986) and it has been reported to have good reliability and validity in both normal and schizophrenic populations.

The Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) is used to assess the severity of alexithymia, it is a 20-item self-report instrument rated on a 5-point Liker-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Total scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher level of alexithymia. The TAS-20 consist of 3 factors: difficulty identifying feelings (DIF); difficulty describing feelings (DDF); externally oriented cognitive style of thinking (EOT). The Chinese version has been shown with having the same factor structure of the original version and has been associated with good internal consistency [15], which was adopted in this study.

The Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) is used to assess the severity of alexithymia, it is a 20-item self-report instrument rated on a 5-point Liker-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Total scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher level of alexithymia. The TAS-20 consist of 3 factors: difficulty identifying feelings (DIF); difficulty describing feelings (DDF); externally oriented cognitive style of thinking (EOT). The Chinese version has been shown with having the same factor structure of the original version and has been associated with good internal consistency [15], which was adopted in this study.

The facial emotion identification test is used to assess facial emotion identification abilities, in which participants viewed 91 digital pictures of faces selected from the Japanese Female Facial Expression (JAFFE) Database (1998) and were asked to judge which emotion that particular face displayed on the screen was expressing (happy, sad, angry, afraid, surprise, disgusted or neutral).

The facial emotion identification test is used to assess facial emotion identification abilities, in which participants viewed 91 digital pictures of faces selected from the Japanese Female Facial Expression (JAFFE) Database (1998) and were asked to judge which emotion that particular face displayed on the screen was expressing (happy, sad, angry, afraid, surprise, disgusted or neutral).