Levosimendan
DrugLevosimendan 1 mg capsule for oral administration
Other names: ODM-109
NCT Number: NCT03505021
This study will evaluate whether prolonged oral levosimendan can preserve respiratory function more effectively than placebo, resulting in better patient functionality as measured by the ALSFRS-R scale. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study, subjects are allocated in a 2:1 ratio to receive either levosimendan (1 -2 mg daily) or placebo for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint is slow vital capacity (SVC) at 12 weeks, with the impact on patient function assessed through 48 weeks, adjusted for patient outcome, using ALSFRS-R (combined assessment of function and survival, CAFS). Other important efficacy measures include time to respiratory events, clinical global impression (CGI), assessment of dyspnea using the Borg scale and sleep scales (Pittsburgh sleep quality index and Epworth sleepiness scale). Patient safety is monitored using conventional methods including adverse events, safety laboratory tests, vital signs and 12-lead EKG. Following screening and baseline visits, patients attend the clinic at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks, with telephone assessments conducted at weeks 18, 30 and 42. An end of study visit is performed 14-25 days after the last study treatment administration. The study will be monitored by an independent data and safety monitoring board. A long-term extension study will be available for patients completing the study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–120 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Brain and Mind Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Levosimendan 1 mg capsule for oral administration
Other names: ODM-109
Placebo capsule for oral administration
Other names: Placebo for ODM-109
Time frame: The change from baseline at 12 weeks
Change from baseline to 12 weeks, expressed as % of predicted normal.
Time frame: Mean rank at 48 weeks
Scale: The ALS Functional Rating Scale - Revised. This scale includes 12 items. Each item was scored from 0 to 4. Total score is the sum of the scores of all 12 items. Each subject is ranked according to time-to-death (earlier deaths ranked lower than later deaths). Subjects who survive are ranked more favorably than subjects who died. Among the survivors, subjects are ranked according to change in ALSFRS-R (greater worsening of ALSFRS-R is ranked lower than after deaths). Subjects who survive are ranked more favorably than subjects who died. Among the survivors, subjects are ranked according to change in ALSFRS-R (greater worsening of ALSFRS-R is ranked lower than less worsening or an improvement in ALSFRS-R). The ranked scores range from 001 to 496 (the number of participants assessed for the Outcome Measure) with larger rank score numbers associated with a better outcome.
Time frame: Time to event through 48 weeks
ALSFRS-R scale contains 3 items that relate to respiratory function: severity of dyspnoea, occurrence of orthopnoea (shortness of breath when lying flat) and the use of mechanical ventilation for respiratory insufficiency. A reduction in any one of these items was considered a respiratory event. Not all patients receive ventilatory support, despite respiratory insufficiency: meeting "protocolised" criteria for NIV relates to patients without NIV whose slow vital capacity declined to a level that would ordinarily trigger such treatment.
Time frame: The change from baseline at 48 weeks
Visual Analogue Scale 0-100 millimeters, rated by study subjects. Score 0 indicates that the subject is completely well without any disability and score 100 indicates the worst possible severity of the condition.
Time frame: Slope of decline at 48 weeks
ALSFRS-R scale contains 3 items that relate to respiratory function: severity of dyspnoea, occurrence of orthopnoea (shortness of breath when lying flat) and the use of mechanical ventilation for respiratory insufficiency. These are added together to created the respiratory domain with a score range 0-12 (where 12 represents normal function). Although individual items and patients vary, ALSFRS-R typically declines at a relatively constant rate over time. Plotted over time the slope of the line obtained indicates the speed of progression and thus an effective treatment might be expected to reduce the slope of decline.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Patients rated their perception of the severity of their dysnoea using the Borg scale. The scale ranges from 0 (no dyspnoea) to 10 (maximal). Each category is numbered and most (not all) have verbal cues. At each assessment the patient scored the category they felt best described their symptoms. The analysis measured change from baseline at 12 weeks, where a negative score indicates improvement and a positive score reflects worsening.
Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma
Industry
Acronym: REFALS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01925196
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Brain Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05562960
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Central Nervous System Diseases
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT04259255
ALS, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05189106
Alzheimer Disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details