Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06025669

Effects of Nap Restriction on Preschoolers' Empathy, Prosocial Behaviors and Executive Function

Cross-sectional evidences suggest a relationship between early childhood sleep and cognitive as well as socio-emotional functions. However, the casual relation has not been fully revealed. The current study aims to perform a randomized lab-based crossover nap restriction study on preschoolers, to determine the effects of sleep restriction on preschoolers empathy, prosocial behaviors as well as executive functions.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

42 month–72 month

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

About this study

The study will enroll preschoolers with regular nap habits. Under a randomized repeated-measures crossover design, they follow a strict sleep schedule (≥ 12.5 hours' time in bed every 24 hours) for 5 days, before each of two pseudorandomly assigned afternoon assessments following nap-rested or nap-restricted conditions. Actigraphy is applied to monitor sleep, and occipital alpha power is detected from resting-state EEG to objectively measure sleepiness. Empathy (Empathic for Pain Event-related Potential Paradigm) and prosocial behaviors (Concern for Others Behavioral Paradigm) were measured at each assessment. The effects of nap restriction were analyzed with paired t-test/Wilcoxon matched-pairs sign rank test and repeated-measures ANOVA.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • healthy, typically developing, Intelligence quotient (IQ) ≥ 85;
  • never diagnosed with emotional-behavioral problems;
  • sleeping on a regular daily schedule;
  • reported napping three or more times every week, ≤ one nap in one day;
  • able to fall asleep by themselves.

Exclusion criteria

  • not able to fall asleep alone;
  • travel beyond two time zones within 3 months of the study;
  • use of medications influencing sleep or alertness;
  • reported or diagnosed sleep problems (such as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), narcolepsy, parasomnia, insomnia, etc.) ;
  • history of neurodevelopmental diseases, including developmental delay, epilepsy, chronic medical conditions, lead poisoning and head injuries involving loss of consciousness;
  • conceptual age <35 weeks or > 45 weeks;
  • birth weight < 2,500 grams;
  • Children's Behaviors Checklist (CBCL) total score > 70;
  • a first-degree family history of diagnosed narcolepsy, psychosis or bipolar disorder.

Treatment and study plan

Nap restriction

Behavioral

There are 2 interventions in the single-arm, that is, the nap rested condition and the nap restriction condition. The sequence of nap intervention followed randomization.

Primary outcomes

  1. Voltage of N2 and Late Positive Potential (LPP) components

    Time frame: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction

    Child brain electroencephalogram (EEG) signals were collected via a non-invasive electrical brain cap and a wireless signal amplifier during the Empathic for Pain Event-related Potential Paradigm. The paradigm presents 32 pairs of empathic pain-related pictures at each sleep intervention condition (e.g., a hand hit by a hammer). The children are asked to think about "How painful do you think the person in the picture feels?" while looking at each picture. After data processing, the voltages of N2 (i.e. the negative potential at approximately 200 ms poststimulus) and LPP (a protracted slow-wave component elicited by emotional stimuli) are output and compared across sleep conditions.

  2. Empathic pain rating

    Time frame: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction

    The Empathic for Pain Event-related Potential Paradigm presents 32 pairs of empathic pain-related pictures at each sleep intervention condition (e.g., a hand hit by a hammer). The children are asked to rate on "How pain do you think the person in the picture feels?" with the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating System. The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating System includes 6 faces demonstrating painful expressions, scoring 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 points respectively, with higher scores representing higher levels of vicarious painful feelings. The mean scores of ratings are used to compare the empathy behavioral level across sleep conditions.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Executive function - behavior

    Time frame: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction

    The Heart and Flower Paradigm is used to measure child executive function. The children are asked to press left button while seeing a heart in the middle of the screen, and to press the right button while seeing a flower in the middle of the screen. The correct rate and response time is used to compare the executive performance across sleep conditions.

  2. Executive function - EEG signal

    Time frame: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction

    The Heart and Flower Paradigm is used to measure child executive function. The children are asked to press left button while seeing a heart in the middle of the screen, and to press the right button while seeing a flower in the middle of the screen. And the EEG signal are collected simultaneously. The β/Θ ratio of EEG signal is used to compare executive brain functions across sleep conditions.

  3. Emotional arousal

    Time frame: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction

    During the Concern for Others Paradigm, the child's epidermal electricity level is measured at baseline and during the pain demonstration, and the differences between baseline and during the pain demonstration are used to compare the child's emotional arousal across sleep conditions.

  4. Emotion regulation

    Time frame: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction

    During the Concern for Others Paradigm, the child's respiratory sinus arrhythmia level is measured at baseline and during the pain demonstration, and the differences between baseline and during the pain demonstration are used to compare the child's emotion regulation across sleep conditions.

  5. Prosocial behavior level

    Time frame: 20 minutes after waking up from scheduled nap, or 20 minutes post nap restriction

    After the Empathic for Pain Event-related Potential Paradigm and Heart and Flower Paradigm are finished. Prosocial behaviors are measured under the Concern for Others Paradigm. Children are introduced to a playroom, where the experimenter plays with the child and "accidentally" hurts herself. The experimenter then demonstrates pain for one minute under standard procedure. Children's behaviors and expressions are recorded, and coded in four aspects: prosocial behaviors (1 to 6 points, higher scores represent higher levels of prosocial behaviors); empathic concern (1 to 4 points, higher scores represent higher levels of empathic concern); hypothesis testing (1 to 4 points, higher scores represent higher levels of hypothesis testing); and avoidance (0 to 1 points, higher scores represent higher levels of avoidance).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Sep 6, 2023
Registry last updated
Jan 5, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.