Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04469790

Effects of Multi-day Interruptions in Sitting on Type 2 Diabetes-relevant Outcomes in Children

The overall objective of this in-lab randomized controlled trial is to test the efficacy of multi-day interruptions in sedentary behavior vs. single bouts of sustained exercise on metabolic, cognitive, affective, and cardiac autonomic nervous system responses in children with overweight and obesity who are at risk for type 2 diabetes. The use of continuous glucose monitoring will provide insight into the daily and cumulative metabolic effects of each condition that have thus far not been studied. In-lab studies demonstrating sustained efficacy of this approach in ameliorating negative effects of sedentary behaviors in children are necessary for the optimization of field-based interventions. Given the lack of success of interventions to prevent obesity-related diseases and increasing rates of type 2 diabetes in children and its related healthcare costs, this study addresses a critical public health need by testing of novel intervention strategies to reduce obesity-related diseases in children with overweight and obesity.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

8 year–11 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Britni Ryan Belcher, PhD, MPH

Los Angeles, California, 90032, United States

About this study

Rationale: Sedentary behavior (SB) contributes to increased risk for obesity and metabolic disease, cognitive deficits, affect disorders, and cardiovascular disease over the lifespan. These are critical outcomes because children with these risk factors are more likely to develop type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). SB increases T2DM risk by promoting hyperglycemia and greater postprandial glycemic variability as well as via cognitive detriments and depressive symptoms that lead to poor energy balance behaviors, obesity, and worsening insulin resistance. Additionally, prolonged SB may contribute to dominance of the sympathetic nervous system and lead to poor cardiovascular disease outcomes. Physical activity can reduce these risk factors, however less than half of US youth meet guideline recommendations, and physical activity continues to decline throughout adolescence. Thus, there is a critical need to test alternative intervention approaches to sustained bouts of exercise for the prevention of T2DM in children. The investigators were the first to show that interrupting SB with short, 3-minute, bouts of moderate exercise improved glucose tolerance and negative mood in a single 3-hour session. However, it is unknown whether these short-term improvements translate to sustained multi-day benefits to metabolic, cognitive, mood, and cardiac autonomic nervous system outcomes.

Intervention: This phase II randomized controlled trial (RCT) will compare the effects of SB interruptions vs. sustained bouts of exercise to prolonged sitting in 8-11-year-old children with overweight/obesity. Participants (N=150 (50 per group)) will be recruited from the community. The participants will wear continuous glucose monitors for one week and complete pre- and post- experiment 3-hour oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT). Children will be randomized to 7 consecutive days of one of the following 3-hour experimental conditions: a) continuous sitting (SIT); b) sitting interrupted by 3-minute bouts of moderate-intensity walking every 30 minutes (SIT+WALK); or c) a single 18-minute bout of moderate-intensity walking followed by continuous sitting (EX).

Objectives/Purpose: The overall goal of this study is to test the efficacy of multi-day effects of interrupting SB as a T2DM prevention strategy in youth with overweight/obesity. This proposal will address the following aims: (1) determine the multi-day efficacy of interrupting sitting on glucose homeostasis measured by continuous glucose monitor and oral glucose tolerance tests; (2) determine the multi-day efficacy of interrupting sitting on cognitive function improvements; (3) determine the multi-day efficacy of interrupting sitting on affect and anxiety improvements; and (4) determine the multi-day efficacy of interrupting sitting on cardiac autonomic nervous system improvements measured by heart rate variability.

Study Population: The study population will consist of children with overweight/obesity recruited from the greater Los Angeles area. Children will be screened for eligibility (no evidence of type 2 diabetes, have overweight/obesity, be in good health, and be in early pubertal stages).

Study Methodology: This study is a phase II RCT with 3 study arms. Participants (N=150) will complete one screening visit to determine eligibility, complete a fitness test, and body composition analysis via dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). All participants will complete two 3-hour in-lab oral glucose tolerance tests (spaced 6 days apart). Participants will wear an activity monitor on the right thigh and an electrocardiogram (ECG) monitor on the chest 7 days to determine baseline activity levels and heart rate variability, respectively. Then, participants will complete 7 consecutive in-lab sessions (SIT, SIT+WALK, or EX), with a 3-hour OGTT on Days 1 and 7. Participants will wear activity monitors, continuous glucose monitors, and ECG monitors during these 7 days of experimental sessions. Questionnaires will assess dietary intake, affect, anxiety, and mood, and the NIH Toolbox will assess executive cognitive function.

Study Arms: Participants will be randomized to 7 consecutive days of one of the following 3-hour experimental conditions in the lab: a) continuous sitting (SIT); b) sitting interrupted by 3-minute bouts of moderate-intensity walking every 30 minutes (SIT+WALK); or c) a single 18-minute bout of moderate-intensity walking followed by continuous sitting (EX).

Endpoints/Outcomes: The primary endpoints are: insulin, C-peptide, and glucose area under the curve (AUC) in the in-lab experiments, and glucose AUC from the continuous glucose monitor. Secondary endpoints are positive and negative affect, anxiety, executive cognitive function, and heart rate variability metrics.

Follow-up: Study duration is estimated as 14 days minimum and 30 days maximum, to allow for a 7-21 day period between the screening and experimental visits.

Statistical Analyses: The populations for analyses include the full analytical dataset which consists of all randomized study participants; the investigators will employ per protocol and intent to treat analyses.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 8-11 years-old
  • Good general health
  • BMI≥85th percentile

Exclusion criteria

  • Significant cardiac or pulmonary disease likely to or resulting in hypoxia or decreased perfusion
  • Diagnosis of T2DM and/or presence of other endocrinologic disorders leading to obesity (e.g., Cushing Syndrome)
  • Current or past anti-psychotic drug use that would affect metabolism
  • Non-diet treatment for hypertension or dyslipidemia
  • Precocious puberty and/or receiving androgen and estrogen therapy
  • Medication use known to affect body composition/weight

Treatment and study plan

SIT+WALK

Behavioral

Participants will interrupt their sitting for one week

Other names: Interrupted sitting

EX

Behavioral

Participants will perform a single bout of exercise and then sit for the remaining time for one week

Other names: Sustained exercise

Primary outcomes

  1. In-Lab glucose area under the curve (AUC)

    Time frame: 3 hours (-10, 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes) AUC change from Day 1 to Day 7

    change in glucose AUC from oral glucose tolerance tests

  2. In-Lab insulin area under the curve (AUC)

    Time frame: 3 hours (-10, 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes) AUC change from Day 1 to Day 7

    change in insulin AUC from oral glucose tolerance tests

  3. In-Lab c-peptide area under the curve (AUC)

    Time frame: 3 hours (-10, 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 minutes) AUC change from Day 1 to Day 7

    change in c-peptide AUC from oral glucose tolerance tests

  4. Continuous glucose monitor measures

    Time frame: 7 days

    mean daily 24-hr glucose area under the curve (AUC)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cognitive function measures

    Time frame: change from Day 1 to Day 7

    attention, inhibition, working and episodic memory tasks from NIH Toolbox

  2. Positive and Negative Affect Scale for Children

    Time frame: change from Day 1 to Day 7

    10-item positive and negative affect scale with scores for each ranging from 0 to 5, higher scores indicating worse outcome for negative affect and better outcome for positive affect

  3. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAIC)

    Time frame: change from Day 1 to Day 7

    state anxiety will be measured using the STAIC, with a range from 20 to 80 with higher scores indicating more anxiety

  4. Cardiac autonomic nervous system measures

    Time frame: 7 days

    mean daily heart rate variability metrics, including standard deviation of R-R intervals, root mean square of RR interval differences, high frequency, low frequency, and high to low frequency ratio

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Southern California

Other

Collaborators

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Registry information

Official study title

Testing the Efficacy of Multi-day Interruptions in Sedentary Behaviors on Metabolic, Cognitive, and Affective Outcomes in Youth at Risk for Type 2 Diabetes

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jul 14, 2020
Registry last updated
Jun 15, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.