Tazemetostat
DrugA single, oral, 400 mg dose of tazemetostat on Day 1, Day 15, and Day 36; and tazemetostat (oral 400 mg) tablets twice daily on Days 3 - 14 and Days 21 - 35.
Other names: EPZ-6438, Tazverik
NCT Number: NCT04537715
The participants of this study will have advanced malignancies (also known as advanced cancer). The main aim of this trial will be to study the blood levels (known as pharmacokinetics) of the tazemtostat (the study drug) when administered in combination with another drug.
Part 1 of the study will evaluate the interaction between the drugs tazemetostat and itraconazole.
Part 2 of the study will evaluate the interaction between the drugs tazemetostat and rifampin
For both Parts 1 and 2, safety and the level that effects of the study drug can be tolerated (known as tolerability) will be assessed throughout.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Onkologikoa, Donostia / San Sebastian, Gipuzkoa, Spain
This two-part study is designed to characterize the steady-state PK of oral tazemetostat and its metabolite EPZ 6930 when administered as a single and twice daily dose in subjects with advanced malignancies while taken alone or in combination with either itraconazole or rifampin.
Part 1: tazemetostat and Itraconazole Drug Interaction Part 1 of the study will evaluate the drug-drug interaction between tazemetostat and itraconazole in an open-label, fixed sequential cross over design.
Part 2: tazemetostat and Rifampin Drug Interaction Part 2 of the study will evaluate the drug-drug interaction between tazemetostat and rifampin in an open-label, fixed sequential cross over design.
For both Parts 1 and 2, safety and tolerability will be assessed throughout the subject's participation. Subjects must have an end of study visit after 30 days of the last dose of tazemetostat for safety assessment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Note: Subjects with prior radiotherapy will be included; however, radiotherapy alone will not be considered a separate systemic treatment regimen.
NOTE: Male subjects must not donate sperm during study treatment (including during dose interruptions), and for 3 months after study drug discontinuation.
Exclusion criteria
A single, oral, 400 mg dose of tazemetostat on Day 1, Day 15, and Day 36; and tazemetostat (oral 400 mg) tablets twice daily on Days 3 - 14 and Days 21 - 35.
Other names: EPZ-6438, Tazverik
Oral 200 mg itraconazole once daily on Days 18 - 38
Other names: Sporanox
Oral 600 mg rifampin once daily on Days 17 - 25.
Other names: RIF, Rifampicin, Rifadin, Rimactane
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. AUC0-12h was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method. AUC0-12h was estimated by a combination of linear trapezoidal method on concentrations going up and logarithmic trapezoidal method on concentrations going down (Linear up/Log down method).
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 36, 48, and 72 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Cmax was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. AUC0-12h was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method. AUC0-12h was estimated by a combination of linear trapezoidal method on concentrations going up and logarithmic trapezoidal method on concentrations going down (Linear up/Log down method).
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Cmax was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. AUC0-12h was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method. AUC0-12h was estimated by a combination of linear trapezoidal method on concentrations going up and logarithmic trapezoidal method on concentrations going down (Linear up/Log down method).
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 36
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. AUC0-12h was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method. AUC0-12h was estimated by a combination of linear trapezoidal method on concentrations going up and logarithmic trapezoidal method on concentrations going down (Linear up/Log down method).
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 36, and 72 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Cmax was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 36, and 72 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 36
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Cmax was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 36, and 72 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Tmax was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 36, and 72 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 36
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Tmax was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 36, and 72 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. T1/2 was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 36, and 72 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 36
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. T1/2 was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. AUC0-12h was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method. AUC0-12h was estimated by a combination of linear trapezoidal method on concentrations going up and logarithmic trapezoidal method on concentrations going down (Linear up/Log down method).
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 24
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. AUC0-12h was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method. AUC0-12h was estimated by a combination of linear trapezoidal method on concentrations going up and logarithmic trapezoidal method on concentrations going down (Linear up/Log down method).
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Cmax was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 24
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Cmax was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Tmax was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 24
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Tmax was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. T1/2 was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 24
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. T1/2 was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. AUC0-12h accumulation ratio was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method. AUC0-12h accumulation ratio was calculated as the ratio of AUC0-12h at steady state (Cycle 1 Day 15) divided by AUC0-12 during the initial dosing interval (Cycle 1 Day 1).
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8,12, 36, 48 post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, and 72 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Cmax accumulation ratio was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method. Cmax accumulation ratio was calculated as the ratio of Cmax at steady state (Cycle 1 Day 15) divided by Cmax during the initial dosing interval (Cycle 1 Day 1).
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 (without itraconazole) and Cycle 1 Day 21 (with itraconazole)
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Drug-drug interaction was assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 (without itraconazole) and Cycle 1 Day 21 (with itraconazole)
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Drug-drug interaction was assessed using ANOVA.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (without itraconazole) and Cycle 1 Day 36 (with itraconazole)
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Drug-drug interaction was assessed using ANOVA.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 36, and 72 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (without itraconazole) and Cycle 1 Day 36 (with itraconazole)
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Drug-drug interaction was assessed using ANOVA.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8,12, 24, 36, and 48 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. AUC0-12h accumulation ratio was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method. AUC0-12h accumulation ratio was calculated as the ratio of AUC0-12h at steady state (Cycle 1 Day 15) divided by AUC0-12h during the initial dosing interval (Cycle 1 Day 1).
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8,12, 24, 36, and 48 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Cmax accumulation ratio was assessed using non-compartmental data analysis method. Cmax accumulation ratio was calculated as the ratio of Cmax at steady state (Cycle 1 Day 15) divided by Cmax during the initial dosing interval (Cycle 1 Day 1).
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (without rifampin) and Cycle 1 Day 24 (with rifampin)
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Drug-drug interaction was assessed using ANOVA.
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 15 (without rifampin) and Cycle 1 Day 24 (with rifampin)
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints. Drug-drug interaction was assessed using ANOVA.
Epizyme, Inc.
Industry
A Phase I, Open-label Multi-dose Two-part Study to Characterize the Effects of a Strong CYP3A4 Inhibitor and a Strong CYP3A4 Inducer on the Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Tazemetostat (EPZ-6438) in Subjects With Advanced Malignancies
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00730678
All Malignancies, Children Being Treated for Catastrophic Illness
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02875548
Adenoma, Advanced Solid Tumors
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04028479
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04488354
Blood Protein Disorders, Burkitt Lymphoma
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial Details