Omer Hospital & Cardiac Center
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
NCT Number: NCT07055802
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a widespread yet difficult-to-manage and treat public health condition with a significant treatment failure rate. Both inversion table therapy and mulligan techniques are very effective in reducing low back pain. A number of literature supports the effectiveness of both techniques individually but there is no literature available that provide comparison between these two techniques.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me30 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Study objective will be to compare the effect of inversion table therapy versus mulligan techniques on pain and lumber flexibility in patients with chronic low back pain
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Inversion Table group will receive flexion biased exercises in supine position with 05 repetitions every session and in addition will be given an inversion table therapy as a treatment at the angle of 60' for 5 minutes in every session. Two follow ups in a week were taken for total of 04 weeks. Measurements were taken for NPRS, Oswestry low back disability questionnaire and sit and reach test respectively
experimental group named as Mulligan group will receive flexion biased exercises in supine position with 05 repetitions every session and in addition will be given mulligan technique. It was done at level just below ASIS (at level of L4-L5 spinous process), ten times/session, for 12 sessions three/week every other day for 4 weeks. . Measurements were taken for NPRS, Oswestry low back disability questionnaire and sit and reach test respectively
Time frame: 12 Months
Oswestry disability index is used to identify level of disability or severity of lower back pain(20). For those suffering from low back pain (LBP), the Oswestry Disability Index is a commonly used outcome measure. It takes five minutes to complete and one minute to rate the self-administered ODI questionnaire. Scores correspond to a range of disabilities, from mild to bedridden. Time period for again filling of Oswestry questionnaire is 4 weeks. It is important to measure disability level in lower back pain and ODI is an important reliable tool to measure lower back disability. There are different scoring levels in percentage which indicates level of disability in ODI. From 0 to 4, there is no disability; from 5 to 14, a mild disability; from 15 to 24, a moderate disability; from 25 to 34, a severe disability; and from 35 to 50, a totally crippled person.
Time frame: 12 Months
Rand SF-36 is a questionnaire used to assess quality of life. This tool consists of eight areas: physical function, vitality, emotional role function, general health awareness, physical aches, physical function, social function, and mental health. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. A score of 0 is equal to the maximum dysfunction, and a score of 100 means no dysfunction.
Time frame: 12 Months
Sit and Reach test is used to measure lumber flexibility through flexing lumber spine. In this test subject is in sitting position with legs fully extended and relaxed knee. Subject is asked to reach his arms as far as possible at flexibility meter and hold for 2 seconds. It comprises of different scores in cm categorised as 9 (very poor), 13 (poor), 14 (average), 15 (good), 17 (very good) and 25+ (excellent) Sit and reach test is found to be more reliable tool for measuring flexibility
Superior University
Other
Effects Of Inversion Table Therapy Versus Mulligan Techniques On Pain And Lumbar Flexibility In Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06831994
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Hamburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT05351541
Chronic Low-back Pain, Chronic Pain
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05837234
Chronic Low-back Pain, Chronic Pain
Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT04744883
Chronic Low-back Pain
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details