Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06147167

Effects of Individualized iTBS on Upper Limb Function After Stroke

The primary objective of this clinical study is to assess the comparative efficacy of individualized intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) in contrast to standard iTBS for individuals post-stroke experiencing upper limb impairment. The key inquiries addressed in this study encompass:

Enhancement of Upper Limb Function: The primary investigation seeks to determine whether individualized iTBS yields superior improvements in upper limb functionality compared to standard iTBS.

Long-Term Effects: This study endeavors to explore the sustained effects of both individualized and standard iTBS on upper limb function over an extended duration.

Neural Mechanisms Investigation: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) will be employed to elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying the impact of iTBS on the enhancement of upper limb function.

Post-stroke individuals with upper limb impairment will undergo pre-treatment assessments, including motor function evaluations and fNIRS tests. Subsequently, they will be randomized into three groups: individualized iTBS, standard iTBS, and sham stimulation. Participants will undergo post-treatment assessments and follow-up evaluations.

The research team aims to discern disparities in the efficacy of different iTBS modalities. The central hypothesis posits that individualized iTBS will demonstrate superior efficacy in enhancing post-stroke upper limb function, with sustained effects persisting for a minimum of one month.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Qilu hospital of Shandong University

Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China

About this study

This research constitutes a single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled study. Upon enrollment, baseline information is established through the assessment of upper limb function using the Fugl Meyer Assessment (FMA), the modified Rankin Scale, the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and a handgrip test. Additionally, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is employed to assess brain function, providing insights into the patient's motor network.

Participants in the study are randomly assigned to one of three groups: individualized iTBS, standard iTBS, and sham stimulation. All participants undergo physical therapy and occupational therapy tailored to their functional evaluation. After three weeks of treatment, participants are required to complete the aforementioned assessments, with a follow-up evaluation scheduled one month post-treatment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • aging from 18-80
  • diagnosed as first-happened stroke,duration of the disease ranged from 1-3 months
  • upper extremity impairment
  • with mini-mental state examination>15
  • agree to participate in this study and sigh the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • with stroke history
  • have metal device within the body
  • with history of upper extremity trauma,fracture, and/or burn
  • serious conditions and can not finish the examination and treatment

Treatment and study plan

individualized intermittent theta burst sitmulation (iTBS)

Device

Participants undergo daily sessions of individualized intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) administered with the MagStim stimulator (Rapid2, MagStim, Whiteland, United States). The intervention spans five days a week and extends over a three-week period. In this group, participants receive a personalized iTBS protocol comprising three pulses of stimulation delivered at 50 Hz, repeated every 200 ms. The stimulation frequency is tailored based on the electroencephalogram (EEG) results and is administered every 10 seconds, with a total duration of 190 seconds. The treatment is administered once a day for five days a week and continues for three weeks, with an immediate cessation in case of any discomfort. This study design ensures a meticulous and tailored approach to iTBS administration.

Other names: physical therapy, occupational therapy

standard iTBS

Device

The MagStim stimulator (Rapid2, MagStim, Whiteland, United States) was employed in the current study. The intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) protocol utilized three pulses of stimulation delivered at a frequency of 50 Hz, with a repetition rate of every 200 ms. These pulses were organized into 2-second trains, repeated every 10 seconds, resulting in a cumulative duration of 190 seconds (equivalent to a total of 600 pulses). Notably, the administration of the treatment ceased promptly in the event of any participant discomfort.

Other names: physical therapy, occupational therapy

Sham stimulation

Device

The device and protocol are identical to the standard iTBS, with the only difference being the orientation of the coil, which is perpendicular to the scalp.

Other names: physical therapy, occupational therapy

Primary outcomes

  1. Fugl-Meyer Assessment-upper extremity

    Time frame: Befor and after the treatment, and 1 month after the treatment.

    Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) scale is an index to assess the sensorimotor impairment in individuals who have had stroke. The FMA motor assessments for the upper fucntion with maximum score 66 points, including relflex activity, flexor synergy, extensor synergy, movement combining synergies, movement out of synergy,normal reflex, wrist function, hand function and coordination/speed, and sensory assessment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. modified Rankin Scale

    Time frame: Befor and after the treatment, and 1 month after the treatment.

    The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) assesses disability in patients who have suffered a stroke and is compared over time to check for recovery and degree of continued disability. A score of 0 is no disability, 5 is disability requiring constant care for all needs; 6 is death.

  2. Action Research Arm Test

    Time frame: Befor and after the treatment, and 1 month after the treatment.

    The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is a 19 item observational measure used by physical therapists and other health care professionals to assess upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery, brain injury and multiple sclerosis populations.Items comprising the ARAT are categorized into four subscales (grasp, grip, pinch and gross movement) and arranged in order of decreasing difficulty, with the most difficult task examined first, followed by the least difficult task. Task performance is rated on a 4-point scale, ranging from 0 (no movement) to 3 (movement performed normally).

  3. handrip test

    Time frame: Befor and after the treatment, and 1 month after the treatment.

    Hand grip test will be finished with a dynamometer.

  4. functional nearinfrared spectroscopy

    Time frame: Befor and after the treatment, and 1 month after the treatment.

    The functional nearinfrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is used to explore the motor network of the participants.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Yonghui Wang, professor

CONTACT

[email protected]

86-18560083581

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Nov 27, 2023
Registry last updated
Apr 22, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.