Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05794893

Effects of Good Behavior Game in a Swedish Sample

This project seeks to study the impact of Good Behavior Game (GBG), a behavior management program, on classroom environment and problem behavior in K-3 classrooms.

The goal of this randomized trial is to study the impact of Good Behavior Game (GBG), a behavior management program, on classroom environment and problem behavior in K-3 classrooms in Sweden. The main question it aims to answer is:

• Does GBG decrease problem behaviors in K-3 classrooms?

Teachers in the intervention group will be trained in GBG and asked to implement it in their respective classrooms. Teachers in the comparison group will provide usual practice.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Problem Behavior Behavior Behavioral Symptoms Child Behavior

Age range

5 year–10 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Johannesskolan, Malmö, Sweden

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Background: Early conduct problems are prevalent and a prominent risk factor for several adverse health-related and psychosocial outcomes in later life. Good Behavior Game (GBG) is a promising school-based behavior management program with the potential of reaching many children in their formative years.

Primary objective: To study the effectiveness of Good Behavior Game in reducing problem behaviors in Swedish K-3 classrooms under real-world conditions.

Secondary objectives: To investigate changes in problem behaviors in common school areas, classroom climate, teacher collective efficacy, on-task behavior, and behavioral management practices as a result of teacher training in GBG. The study also seeks to investigate implementation as a moderator, as well as potential barriers and facilitators in regards to implementation.

Type of trial: Cluster-randomized controlled trial

Trial design and methods: Recruitment of schools in a Swedish municipality started early 2021. In May 2021, 5 schools were randomized to either intervention group or wait-list (service-as-usual). Data collection started in August 2021 and ended in June 2022. The intervention group received training in GBG from September 2021 to May 2022 by certified trainers who also collected fidelity data through observations throughout the school year. Teacher ratings and observer data was collected at baseline (August 2021), along with a first (November 2021) and second follow-up (May 2022, primary endpoint) throughout the first school year of implementation.

Statistical methodology and analysis: Statistical analysis will primarily include frequentist intent-to-treat analysis, and comparisons of estimates with a corresponding Bayesian model using weakly informative priors.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Eligibility is based on school or classroom level factors. Schools must have at least one classroom with a group of students enrolled in grades K, 1, 2, or 3.

Exclusion criteria

  • Special education classrooms are not eligible, though inclusive classrooms with a minority of students needing special education can be included.

Treatment and study plan

Good Behavior Game

Behavioral

Universal school-based intervention reinforcing prosocial behaviors and discouraging disruptive behaviors in young students.

Primary outcomes

  1. Teacher-rated problem behavior in the classroom

    Time frame: Baseline

    A teacher-rated scale listing 20 common problem behaviors in the classroom. The teachers bases their ratings on the week before. Every item is rated on a scale from 0 (no times last week) to 4 (several times a day).

  2. Teacher-rated problem behavior in the classroom

    Time frame: 3 months

    A teacher-rated scale listing 20 common problem behaviors in the classroom. The teachers bases their ratings on the week before. Every item is rated on a scale from 0 (no times last week) to 4 (several times a day).

  3. Teacher-rated problem behavior in the classroom

    Time frame: 9 months (primary endpoint)

    A teacher-rated scale listing 20 common problem behaviors in the classroom. The teachers bases their ratings on the week before. Every item is rated on a scale from 0 (no times last week) to 4 (several times a day).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Classroom Atmosphere Measure

    Time frame: Baseline

    Measure of 10 different behavioral classroom factors rated by an independent observer after 30 minutes of observing a classroom. The observer scores every item on a scale from 1-5, were 1 is generally considered very low and 5 is considered very high. A rating of 0 is used when the item/factor is not applicable or possible to rate. The following items are rated:

    • Students' level of compliance during structured time
    • Students seem to handle transitions well
    • Students consistently follow rules appropriate to settings
    • Students' level of cooperation
    • Students attempt problem-solving
    • Students express feelings appropriately
    • Students' level of interest/enthusiasm/involvement
    • Classroom is focused and on-task
    • Classroom responsive to individual differences in students' needs, feelings, etc.
    • Classroom is supportive of students' efforts

  2. Classroom Atmosphere Measure

    Time frame: 3 months

    Measure of 10 different behavioral classroom factors rated by an independent observer after 30 minutes of observing a classroom. The observer scores every item on a scale from 1-5, were 1 is generally considered very low and 5 is considered very high. A rating of 0 is used when the item/factor is not applicable or possible to rate. The following items are rated:

    • Students' level of compliance during structured time
    • Students seem to handle transitions well
    • Students consistently follow rules appropriate to settings
    • Students' level of cooperation
    • Students attempt problem-solving
    • Students express feelings appropriately
    • Students' level of interest/enthusiasm/involvement
    • Classroom is focused and on-task
    • Classroom responsive to individual differences in students' needs, feelings, etc.
    • Classroom is supportive of students' efforts

  3. Classroom Atmosphere Measure

    Time frame: 9 months

    Measure of 10 different behavioral classroom factors rated by an independent observer after 30 minutes of observing a classroom. The observer scores every item on a scale from 1-5, were 1 is generally considered very low and 5 is considered very high. A rating of 0 is used when the item/factor is not applicable or possible to rate. The following items are rated:

    • Students' level of compliance during structured time
    • Students seem to handle transitions well
    • Students consistently follow rules appropriate to settings
    • Students' level of cooperation
    • Students attempt problem-solving
    • Students express feelings appropriately
    • Students' level of interest/enthusiasm/involvement
    • Classroom is focused and on-task
    • Classroom responsive to individual differences in students' needs, feelings, etc.
    • Classroom is supportive of students' efforts

  4. Classroom Environment Scale

    Time frame: Baseline

    Teacher rates 15 items about the classroom climate (e.g. how well students cooperate, task-orientation etc.). The items are rated on a 0-3 likert scale, some being reverse-coded.

  5. Classroom Environment Scale

    Time frame: 9 months

    Teacher rates 15 items about the classroom climate (e.g. how well students cooperate, task-orientation etc.). The items are rated on a 0-3 likert scale, some being reverse-coded.

  6. On-task behavior: Planned activity check/PLACHECK

    Time frame: Baseline

    Group-based measure of on task behavior in classroom. Rated by an independent assessor. Score is based on number of children on-task divided by total number of children in the classroom. On-task behavior is rated after 3-minute intervals for a total of 18 minutes. An average of the percentage scores is used as an outcome.

  7. On-task behavior: Planned activity check/PLACHECK

    Time frame: 3 months

    Group-based measure of on task behavior in classroom. Rated by an independent assessor. Score is based on number of children on-task divided by total number of children in the classroom. On-task behavior is rated after 3-minute intervals for a total of 18 minutes. An average of the percentage scores is used as an outcome.

  8. On-task behavior: Planned activity check/PLACHECK

    Time frame: 9 months

    Group-based measure of on task behavior in classroom. Rated by an independent assessor. Score is based on number of children on-task divided by total number of children in the classroom. On-task behavior is rated after 3-minute intervals for a total of 18 minutes. An average of the percentage scores is used as an outcome.

  9. Teacher-rated problem behavior in school

    Time frame: Baseline

    A teacher-rated scale listing 20 common problem behaviors in the school's common/shared areas. The teachers bases their ratings on the week before. Every item is rated on a scale from 0 (no times last week) to 4 (several times a day).

  10. Teacher-rated problem behavior in school

    Time frame: 3 months

    A teacher-rated scale listing 20 common problem behaviors in the school's common/shared areas. The teachers bases their ratings on the week before. Every item is rated on a scale from 0 (no times last week) to 4 (several times a day).

  11. Teacher-rated problem behavior in school

    Time frame: 9 months

    A teacher-rated scale listing 20 common problem behaviors in the school's common/shared areas. The teachers bases their ratings on the week before. Every item is rated on a scale from 0 (no times last week) to 4 (several times a day).

  12. Collective teacher efficacy

    Time frame: Baseline

    Teacher rates 12 items on the perceived efficacy of teachers as a collective being able to teach the students attending the school. Items are rated on a 0-5 likert scale, some being reverse-coded.

  13. Collective teacher efficacy

    Time frame: 9 months

    Teacher rates 12 items on the perceived efficacy of teachers as a collective being able to teach the students attending the school. Items are rated on a 0-5 likert scale, some being reverse-coded.

  14. Positive behavior support

    Time frame: Baseline

    The teacher rates 9 items on their own use of several practices that aim to increase desirable behaviors in the classroom. The teacher will report based on the last 30 days. The items can be rated on a scale from 0 (0 times) to 7 (more than 20 times).

  15. Positive behavior support

    Time frame: 9 months

    The teacher rates 9 items on their own use of several practices that aim to increase desirable behaviors in the classroom. The teacher will report based on the last 30 days. The items can be rated on a scale from 0 (0 times) to 7 (more than 20 times).

  16. Behavioral correction

    Time frame: Baseline

    The teacher rates 8 items on their own use of several practices that aim to punish, reduce or correct undesirable behaviors in the classroom. The teacher will report based on the last 30 days. The items can be rated on a scale from 0 (0 times) to 7 (more than 20 times).

  17. Behavioral correction

    Time frame: 9 months

    The teacher rates 8 items on their own use of several practices that aim to punish, reduce or correct undesirable behaviors in the classroom. The teacher will report based on the last 30 days. The items can be rated on a scale from 0 (0 times) to 7 (more than 20 times).

  18. Observed general praise

    Time frame: Baseline

    An independent observer counts the number of times the teacher uses general praise towards one or more students by the teacher. General praise counts as praise were the behavior eliciting praise is not specified, for example "good job". Can also be non-verbal. The observation and counting lasts for 30 minutes.

  19. Observed general praise

    Time frame: 3 months

    An independent observer counts the number of times the teacher uses general praise towards one or more students by the teacher. General praise counts as praise were the behavior eliciting praise is not specified, for example "good job". Can also be non-verbal. The observation and counting lasts for 30 minutes.

  20. Observed general praise

    Time frame: 9 months

    An independent observer counts the number of times the teacher uses general praise towards one or more students by the teacher. General praise counts as praise were the behavior eliciting praise is not specified, for example "good job". Can also be non-verbal. The observation and counting lasts for 30 minutes.

  21. Observed specific praise

    Time frame: Baseline

    An independent observer counts the number of times behavioral specific praise is used towards one or more students by the teacher. Behavioral specific praise counts as praise or feedback that also entails a description of the behavior eliciting praise, such as "good work reading that out loud". The observation and counting lasts for 30 minutes.

  22. Observed specific praise

    Time frame: 3 months

    An independent observer counts the number of times behavioral specific praise is used towards one or more students by the teacher. Behavioral specific praise counts as praise or feedback that also entails a description of the behavior eliciting praise, such as "good work reading that out loud". The observation and counting lasts for 30 minutes.

  23. Observed specific praise

    Time frame: 9 months

    An independent observer counts the number of times behavioral specific praise is used towards one or more students by the teacher. Behavioral specific praise counts as praise or feedback that also entails a description of the behavior eliciting praise, such as "good work reading that out loud". The observation and counting lasts for 30 minutes.

  24. Observed reprimands

    Time frame: Baseline

    An independent observer counts the number of times reprimands are used towards one or more students by the teacher. Reprimands are verbal or non-verbal cues were the teacher demands on students ceasing a certain behavior or otherwise point out a behavior that should not be occuring. The observation and counting lasts for 30 minutes.

  25. Observed reprimands

    Time frame: 3 months

    An independent observer counts the number of times reprimands are used towards one or more students by the teacher. Reprimands are verbal or non-verbal cues were the teacher demands on students ceasing a certain behavior or otherwise point out a behavior that should not be occuring. The observation and counting lasts for 30 minutes.

  26. Observed reprimands

    Time frame: 9 months

    An independent observer counts the number of times reprimands are used towards one or more students by the teacher. Reprimands are verbal or non-verbal cues were the teacher demands on students ceasing a certain behavior or otherwise point out a behavior that should not be occuring. The observation and counting lasts for 30 minutes.

Other outcomes

  1. Implementation barriers and facilitators

    Time frame: Baseline

    A teacher rates 14 items drawn from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The instrument itself is called The Barrier Buster Tool. The instrument primarily measures contextual factors that are thought to affect implementation and fidelity of a method being implemented. Every item has two ratings. First rating scores if the statement is a barrier (0), neutral (1) or facilitating factor (2). The second column rates the strength of the factor, i.e., if the factor is considered to have a weak/no effect (0) or strong effect (1). Only measured in the experimental group receiving GBG.

  2. Implementation barriers and facilitators

    Time frame: 3 months

    A teacher rates 14 items drawn from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The instrument itself is called The Barrier Buster Tool. The instrument primarily measures contextual factors that are thought to affect implementation and fidelity of a method being implemented. Every item has two ratings. First rating scores if the statement is a barrier (0), neutral (1) or facilitating factor (2). The second column rates the strength of the factor, i.e., if the factor is considered to have a weak/no effect (0) or strong effect (1). Only measured in the experimental group receiving GBG.

  3. Implementation barriers and facilitators

    Time frame: 9 months

    A teacher rates 14 items drawn from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The instrument itself is called The Barrier Buster Tool. The instrument primarily measures contextual factors that are thought to affect implementation and fidelity of a method being implemented. Every item has two ratings. First rating scores if the statement is a barrier (0), neutral (1) or facilitating factor (2). The second column rates the strength of the factor, i.e., if the factor is considered to have a weak/no effect (0) or strong effect (1). Only measured in the experimental group receiving GBG.

  4. Average fidelity of implementation

    Time frame: Monthly observations from baseline to 9 months

    The trainers responsible for coaching in GBG observes and rates to what extent teachers are following the manual during GBG-sessions. The trainers used standardized observation forms detailing several components of a GBG session, such as setting rules and announcing the time frame. Scores will be based on number of items that the trainer rates as completed, divided by the maximum number of items possible to complete in a session. The average score is then calculated from all sessions.

  5. Certification in GBG

    Time frame: 9 months

    A certification of completing training and performing GBG with fidelity as assessed by trainers. A score of 0 means the teacher has not been certified at the end of the school year. A score of 1 means the teacher has been certified at the end of the school year. The requirements for certification are: participating in all 3 workshops, conducting at least 60 sessions, being observed and receiving feedback at least 9 times with the trainers assessing the sessions as having high enough fidelity.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Region Skane

Other

Collaborators

  • Lund University

Registry information

Official study title

Good Behavior Game - a Randomized Controlled Study Among Young Children in Swedish Primary Schools.

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Apr 3, 2023
Registry last updated
Apr 3, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.