Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05272111

Effects of Fascia Therapy Versus Facial Manipulation on Neck Pain

This study a randomized clinical trial to determine the effects of fasiatherapy versus facial manipulation on pain, range of motion and function in patients with chronic neck pain. A sample of 52 patients will be taken and divided into two groups each with 26 patients. Group A will receive DBM fasciatherapy along with conventional physical therapy while group B will receive fascial manipulation along with the conventional physical therapy protocol. The conventional physical therapy protocol will include hot pack, neck isometrics and stretches. The session will be around 45 to 60 min on each patient with three session per week on alternate days. A total of three-week treatment regime will be given to the patients and assessment of patient's pain, range of motion and function with NPRS (numeric pain rating scale), goniometry and NDI (neck disability index) will be done at the baseline, after the completion of treatment at three weeks and after 6 weeks to observe the long-term effects. The data will be analyzed using SPSS.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Neck Pain Neurologic Manifestations Pain Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Signs and Symptoms

Age range

18 year–40 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Riphah Rehabilitation Center

Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan

About this study

Chronic neck pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorder among general population. Like muscular spasm of neck that can cause neck pain, fascial adhesions are also the common cause of neck pain. Fascia is a form of connective tissue that is made up of collagen, surrounds the body parts and also resist tissue tensile load. Fascial injury and adhesions are common and can lead to pain, restricted motion and swelling. The treatment of the fascial injury is necessary to relieve those symptoms. There are many treatments for the chronic neck pain and this study focuses on two new treatment techniques for the fascial pain. The first is the Dannis Bois method fasciatherpy which is a manual approach that focuses on the structural segmentation of fascia and involves the application of gentle pressure while stretching the body's connective tissues. The other treatment technique is the fascial manipulation method that involves the treatment which is directed to specific fascial adhesions. The current study is novel in a way that there is limited literature about DBM fasciatherapy versus fascial manipulation on chronic neck pain. Both methods were employed to see if they improve ranges along with accompanying pain and disability.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Both genders
  • Age 18-40 years
  • Chronicity of pain - 6 months minimum

Exclusion criteria

  • Post-op patient
  • Any bony, soft tissue or systemic disease
  • Pregnant females
  • Radiculopathy

Treatment and study plan

DBM fasciatherapy+ conventional physical therapy

Other

DBM fasciatherapy (3 sessions per day). It soft, deep and non-manipulative form of treatment that involves the application of gentle pressure while stretching the body's connective tissue. A specialized form of touch, somatic sense, and specific body movement protocols are the three steps involved in the fasciatherapy. + hot pack (10 min) + neck isometrics (neck flexion, extension, side bending) + neck stretches (neck flexors, extensors, side benders and rotation). A total of 45 min session three times a week on alternate days for three weeks

fascial manipulation+ conventional physical therapy

Other

Fascial manipulation (3 sessions per day). This technique involves the identification of specific, localized areas of the fascia with limited movements. Once it is identified, then a specific point on the fascia is targeted and through the appropriate manipulation of this precise part of the fascia, movement can be restored. + hot pack (10 min) + neck isometrics (neck flexion, extension, side bending) + neck stretches (neck flexors, extensors, side benders and rotation). A total of 45 min session three times a week on alternate days for three weeks

Primary outcomes

  1. 1. NPRS (numeric pain rating scale)

    Time frame: 6th Week

    The NPRS is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale (VAS) in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10) that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing no pain to 10 representing the worst imaginable pain.

  2. 2. Goniometer

    Time frame: 6th Week

    The science of measuring the joint ranges in each plane of the joint is called goniometry. Goniometer is a device that measures an angle or permits the rotation of an object to a definite position. Neck flexion, extension, side bending and rotation will be assessed through it.

  3. NDI

    Time frame: 6th Week

    The NDI has become a standard instrument for measuring self-rated disability due to neck pain. Each of the 10 items scores from 0 to 5. The maximum score is 50.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Fasciatherapy Versus Facial Manipulation on Pain, Range of Motion and Function in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Mar 9, 2022
Registry last updated
Oct 19, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.