Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01282671

Effects of Deep Breathing Exercises Two Months After Cardiac Surgery

Hypothesis: Deep breathing exercises performed during the first two months after cardiac surgery, will improve pulmonary function and patient-perceived quality of recovery.

Specific aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of breathing exercises performed with a mechanical device for positive expiratory pressure during the first two months after cardiac surgery compared to a control group performing no breathing exercises.

Design: A prospective, randomized, controlled two-center study.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Örebro County, Sweden

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Contribution: The study will be taken place at two University hospitals in Sweden.

Uppsala university hospital (PhD, Registered physical therapist (RPT)) Margareta Emtner and RPT Charlotte Urell) and Örebro university hospital; (Elisabeth Westerdahl and RPT Marcus Jonsson).

Time planning: Application to the Research Ethics Committee april 2007. Data collection 2007-2011. Statistical analysis and manuscript writing 2011.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • A sample of 360 adults (>18 years) patients undergoing cardiac surgery at the two University hospitals are invited to participate in the study.
  • Type of cardiac surgery included will be Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) with saphenous vein grafts and/or internal mammary artery graft, valve surgery or combinations of CABG and valve surgery.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who have an emergency operation, previous cardiac or lung surgery, renal dysfunction requiring dialysis or are unable to communicate in Swedish will not be included.
  • Patients who requires more than 24 hours respirator treatment, reintubation, reoperation, sternum instability/infection or develop a neurological, mental or haemodynamic complication that affects the patients' ability to collaborate, will be excluded.

Treatment and study plan

Breathing exercises

Other

On the fourth postoperative day the patients are randomly assigned to a Treatment group continuing to perform deep breathing exercises for 2 months postoperatively and to a Control group who will perform no breathing exercises after the third postoperative day. Patient management is otherwise similar in the groups. The patients in the Deep breathing group will be instructed to perform breathing exercises (3 x 10 deep breaths) 5 times a day (document compliance) during the two postoperative months. A Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) device PEP ventil, System 22 (Rium Medical, Täby, Sweden) is used to create an expiratory resistance of +10 cm H2O.

Other names: Intervention group: Performing breathing exercises., Control group: No breathing exercises.

Primary outcomes

  1. Lung function measured as Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)

    Time frame: Two months after surgery

    Spirometry is performed preoperatively and 2 months after surgery at the Departments of Clinical Physiology. A Jaeger MasterScreen Pulmonary functiontest (PFT)/Bodybox will be used at the University hospitals in Uppsala and Örebro. The medical laboratory technologists are blinded to the patient's treatment allocation. Static and dynamic lung volumes will be measured.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative quality of recovery

    Time frame: Two months postoperatively

    Physical activity, postoperative pain, day of discharge, signs of pneumonia or pulmonary comlications will be noted. Patient-perceived quality of recovery will be assessed using a translated version of a recently validated quality of recovery score (QoR-40) designed to measure the patient's health status after surgery and anaesthesia. The SF (short form) -36 (first version) will be used for assessment of quality of life aspects.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Uppsala University

Other

Collaborators

  • The Swedish Research Council
  • Örebro County Council

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Jan 25, 2011
Registry last updated
Jun 5, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.