Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06938152

Effects of Cycle Therapy vs Sequential Therapy With Romosozumab and Denosumab in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Patients

This study is a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the efficacy of a 24-month cyclic therapy regimen (6 months of Romosozumab followed by 6 months of Denosumab, repeated for two years) versus a traditional sequential treatment regimen (12 months of Romosozumab followed by 12 months of Denosumab). The goal is to determine which approach yields better therapeutic outcomes and to optimize drug strategies for osteoporosis patients.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

50 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, Taiwan

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Fon-Yih Tsuang

CONTACT

[email protected]

+886-2312-3456 ext. 265956

About this study

Osteoporosis is common in postmenopausal women and the elderly, and has been recognized by the World Health Organization as the second most prevalent metabolic bone disease worldwide. Most patients show no obvious symptoms, but a fall or sudden exertion can cause fragility fractures. Once fractures occur, complications such as acute pain, prolonged bed rest, and restricted mobility can significantly impact the quality of life and even increase mortality. Furthermore, managing these conditions requires substantial medical and social resources.

Currently, anti-osteoporosis medications are classified into two major categories: antiresorptive and anabolic agents. Studies have confirmed that both types can increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce fracture risk. However, each medication has usage limitations.

Denosumab is a potent antiresorptive drug, but long-term use can lead to rare side effects such as atypical femoral fractures (AFF) and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Additionally, stopping Denosumab can cause a severe rebound in bone resorption markers (CTX), leading to rapid BMD loss and an increased fracture risk. Managing drug discontinuation remains a major clinical challenge.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1. Postmenopausal women aged 50-90 years
  • 2. BMD T-score ≤ -3.0 at any lumbar vertebra
  • 3. Physically and mentally capable of understanding and complying with the study protocol and follow-up
  • 4. Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • 1. Previous osteoporosis treatment within the past two years, including Romosozumab, Teriparatide, Denosumab, Alendronate, Ibandronate, Zoledronic Acid, Risedronate, Raloxifene, or Bazedoxifene
  • 2. Allergy to Romosozumab or Denosumab
  • 3. Secondary osteoporosis
  • 4. Autoimmune disease
  • 5. Chronic steroid use (e.g., Chronic Obstruction Pulmonary Disease patients)
  • 6. Hypercalcemia or hypocalcemia
  • 7. Metabolic bone diseases
  • 8. Primary or metastatic bone tumors
  • 9. Cancer patients (except for in situ carcinoma and non-melanoma skin cancer, unless fully treated and in remission for five years)
  • 10. Planned dental procedures (e.g., extractions, implants) within the next year
  • 11. History of stent placement, myocardial infarction, stroke, or coronary artery disease
  • 12. Renal disease (Creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL) or dialysis patients
  • 13. Smoking more than one pack per day (except for those who have quit for over ten years)

Treatment and study plan

Romosozumab followed by Denosumab

Drug

Romosozumab 210mg/month for 12 months, then Denosumab 60mg/6months for 12 months

Other names: Sequential therapy group

Romosozumab and Denosumab Cycle Therapy

Drug

Romosozumab 210mg/month for 6 months then followed by Denosumab 60mg/6months once, and then repeat one more time after 6 months

Other names: Cycle therapy group

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in bone mineral density (BMD)

    Time frame: Participants will undergo baseline assessments, followed by evaluations at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.

    Change in BMD at lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip at 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in bone turnover makers (BTM) level

    Time frame: Participants will undergo baseline assessments, followed by evaluations at 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months.

    Changes in BTM, including bone formation (P1NP) and resorption markers (CTX)

  2. Change in visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score

    Time frame: Participants will undergo baseline assessments, followed by evaluations at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months.

    The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain will be used to assess participants' self-reported pain intensity. The VAS score ranges from 0 to 10, higher scores indicate worse pain intensity, and lower scores indicate less pain.

  3. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score change

    Time frame: Participants will undergo baseline assessments, followed by evaluations at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.

    The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) will be used to assess the level of disability related to lower back pain. The ODI score ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores reflect worse functional disability and lower scores reflect better functional status.

  4. New fracture

    Time frame: During the intervention period, up to 24 months.

    Any new fracture within 24 months

  5. Adverse Events

    Time frame: During the intervention period, up to 24 months.

    Any adverse events

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Fon-Yih Tsuang

CONTACT

[email protected]

886-2312-3456 ext. 265956

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Cycle Therapy With Romosozumab and Denosumab 2 Years vs 1 Year Romosozumab Followed by 1 Year Denosumab in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Patients-A Randomized Control Trial

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Apr 22, 2025
Registry last updated
Jun 23, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.