Ghurki Trust & Teaching Hospital
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07381491
Purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of core stabilization with pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation on trunk control and balance which will be provided an evidence-based selection of the best possible intervention to improve trunk function and balance as compared to the trunk control exercises such as Rhythmic stabilization, Bridging, Side-Lying Trunk Lifts, Quadruped, Kneeling and modified plantigrade positioning, which one can provide the better balance and trunk control in sub-acute stroke patients.
Interested in participating?
Request Info45 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Location status: Recruiting
Interventions FITT Principle Intervention was given for 60 min per session (30 + 30 mins for each group), including 3 sets with10 repetitions each, 3 sec rest between each repetition, 1 min rest after each set and 3 min rest between each exercise (this FITT principle for core stabilization and trunk control exercises). For PNF technique each technique was applied for 3 sets of 2 min duration each with 30 sec between each set and 2 min rest after each technique.
Once a day, 5 times per week for 6 weeks for both groups. Groups There were two groups Groups 1 (interventional group) Groups 2 (control group) Groups 1 (interventional group) Participants who were included in this group got Pelvic Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques + core strengthening group + Trunk control exercises (Conventional treatment).
Core stabilization exercises techniques Core activated by Bio Feedback apparatus and participants were given instructions to do trunk curls in crook lying position. Asked to lift their upper trunk slightly (15 degree) from the plinth. 3 sets with 10 repetitions each, 3 sec rest between each repetition, 1 min rest after each set and 3 min rest between each exercise.
Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques The sequence was rhythmic initiation, slow reversal then agonistic reversals. each technique was applied for 3 sets of 2 min duration each with 30 sec between each set and 2 min rest after each technique. A stopwatch was used to measure the time.
Trunk control exercises Different trunk exercises were performed by the participants to develop trunk control and balance. Rhythmic stabilization, Side-Lying Trunk Lifts, Bridging, Quadruped, Kneeling and modified plantigrade positioning, are the trunk exercises which were used conventionally to develop trunk control. 3 sets with 10 repetitions each, 3 sec rest between each repetition, 1 min rest after each set and 3 min rest between each exercise.
Groups 2 (control group) Participants in group 2 received Core stabilization exercises + Conventional trunk control exercises (Rhythmic stabilization, Bridging, Side-Lying Trunk Lifts, Quadruped, Kneeling and modified plantigrade positioning) exercises. 3 sets with 10 repetitions each, 3 sec rest between each repetition, 1 min rest after each set and 3 min rest between each exercise.
Core stabilization exercises techniques Core activated by Bio Feedback apparatus and participants were given instructions to do trunk curls in crook lying position. Asked to lift their upper trunk slightly (15 degree) from the plinth. 3 sets with 10 repetitions each, 3 sec rest between each repetition, 1 min rest after each set and 3 min rest between each exercise.
Trunk control exercises Different trunk exercises were performed by the participants to develop trunk control and balance. Rhythmic stabilization, Side-Lying Trunk Lifts, Bridging, Quadruped, Kneeling and modified plantigrade positioning, are the trunk exercises which were used conventionally to develop trunk control. 3 sets with 10 repetitions each, 3 sec rest between each repetition, 1 min rest after each set and 3 min rest between each exercise.
Outcomes Measures Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) is a standardized scale to assess the trunk function and stability in stroke patients(39). We used the pre- and post-intervention scores of Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) to evaluate trunk function and stability.
Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is identified as the most commonly used as an evaluation tool in the stroke rehabilitation(40). We used the pre- and post-intervention scores of Berg Balance Scale (BBS) to evaluate the balance.
Data Collection Procedure The study was conducted by informed consent from participants. Assessment was performed before the intervention and after the intervention (after 6 weeks) from Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Pre-interventional and post interventional scores were documented and analyzed the according to the statistical method.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Core activated by Bio Feedback apparatus and participants were given instructions to do trunk curls in crook lying position. Asked to lift their upper trunk slightly (15 degree) from the plinth. 3 sets with 10 repetitions each, 3 sec rest between each repetition, 1 min rest after each set and 3 min rest between each exercise.
Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques The sequence was rhythmic initiation, slow reversal then agonistic reversals. each technique was applied for 3 sets of 2 min duration each with 30 sec between each set and 2 min rest after each technique. A stopwatch was used to measure the time.
Trunk control exercises Different trunk exercises were performed by the participants to develop trunk control and balance. Rhythmic stabilization, Side-Lying Trunk Lifts, Bridging, Quadruped, Kneeling and modified plantigrade positioning, are the trunk exercises which were used conventionally to develop trunk control. 3 sets with 10 repetitions each, 3 sec rest between each repetition, 1 min rest after each set and 3 min rest between each exercise.
Time frame: • Baseline • After 6 weeks
The Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) is a 17-item clinical tool assessing stroke patients across three subscales-static sitting balance (0-7 points), dynamic sitting balance (0--10points), and trunk coordination (0-6 points)-totaling a maximum score of 23. Higher scores indicate better, more controlled, and coordinated trunk function, with evaluations performed in a seated position.
Time frame: • Baseline • After 6 weeks
Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is identified as the most commonly used as an evaluation tool in the stroke rehabilitation. We used the pre- and post-intervention scores of Berg Balance Scale (BBS) to evaluate the balance. Total score of berg balance scale is 56.Highest score shows the low fall risk and the lowest score shows the high fall risk.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Nabeela Dawood, NMPT
CONTACT
Talha Mumtaz, Doctor of Physical Therapy
CONTACT
Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06615973
Brain Disease, Brain Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05378035
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT03821129
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Abnormalities
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07737431
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
View Trial Details