Centre for Physical Activity, Sport and Exercise Sciences, Research Laboratory, Coventry University
Coventry, CV1 5FB, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT07681011
This study investigated whether exercising in cold environments affects appetite, energy intake, and food preference compared with exercising in thermoneutral conditions. Eleven healthy males completed five laboratory trials as part of a crossover study: a control trial and four exercise trials performed in cold-water (16°C), thermoneutral water (35°C), cold-ambient air (6°C), and thermoneutral ambient air (26°C). Appetite responses were assessed throughout each trial, and participants were provided with an ad libitum meal after exercise to measure energy intake. Food preference was assessed using the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire. The study aimed to determine whether environmental temperature and exercise medium influence acute post-exercise eating behaviour.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Coventry, CV1 5FB, United Kingdom
Exercise performed in cold environments may influence thermoregulatory responses and subsequent eating behaviour differently compared with exercise performed under thermoneutral conditions. Previous research suggests that cold exposure may increase post-exercise energy intake; however, the influence of environmental temperature and exercise medium (water versus air) on appetite regulation and food-related behaviour remains unclear.
This study used a randomised repeated-measures crossover design to investigate the effects of cold and thermoneutral exercise conditions on appetite, energy intake, and food preference in healthy males.
Eleven healthy males completed five laboratory trials: a no-exercise control condition and four experimental exercise conditions consisting of 30 minutes of arm-leg rowing exercise performed in cold-water (16°C), thermoneutral water (35°C), cold-ambient air (6°C), and thermoneutral ambient air (26°C). Trials were separated by a minimum seven-day washout period.
Appetite responses were assessed using visual analogue scales throughout each trial. Following exercise, participants consumed an ad libitum meal to assess acute post-exercise energy intake. Food preference responses, including food appeal and preference measures, were assessed using the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire.
The primary objective was to determine whether environmental temperature and exercise medium influence post-exercise energy intake. Secondary objectives were to examine effects on subjective appetite and food preference measures.
This study provides insight into how exercising in different thermal environments may influence immediate eating behaviour following exercise.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Resting control condition with no exercise exposure.
Arm-leg rowing exercise performed in 16°C water.
Arm-leg rowing exercise performed in 35°C water.
Arm-leg rowing exercise performed in 6°C ambient air.
Arm-leg rowing exercise performed in 26°C ambient air.
Time frame: 30 minutes after completion of the 30-minute experimental/control condition.
Energy intake consumed during an ad libitum homogeneous pasta meal provided after each 30-minute experimental/control condition. The mass of food consumed was determined by subtracting the mass of food remaining (including leftovers on the plate and cutlery). Absolute energy intake was calculated using the nutritional information provided by the food manufacturer.
Time frame: Before and after breakfast, before the 30-minute experimental/control condition, during the 30-minute experimental/control condition, and before and after the ad libitum meal.
Subjective appetite responses including hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food consumption assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 mm (not at all) to 100 mm (extremely). Higher scores indicate greater subjective appetite sensations.
Time frame: 15 minutes after completion of each 30-minute experimental/control trial and 15-minutes before the ad libitum meal.
Food preference and reward responses assessed using the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire (LFPQ). Outcomes include explicit liking, explicit wanting, implicit wanting, and fat and sweet appeal bias scores. Higher scores indicate greater preference or reward response for the respective food category (fat or sweet).
Time frame: During the 30-minute experimental/control condition and during the 60-minute post-exposure recovery period.
Changes in core body temperature measured continuously using a rectal thermistor during and after each experimental/control condition.
Time frame: During the 30-minute experimental/control condition.
Energy expenditure during the exercise/control condition estimated from breath-by-breath oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production using indirect calorimetry.
Time frame: 5-minutes before and 5-minutes after the 30-minute experimental/control condition.
Skin temperature was measured at four sites (chest, bicep, thigh, and calf) using skin temperature probes. Mean skin temperature and mean body temperature were calculated to assess changes in peripheral and overall thermal status.
Time frame: During the 30-minute experimental/control condition at 10-minute intervals.
Thermal sensation was assessed using the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) 7-point Thermal Sensation Scale, ranging from -3 (cold) to +3 (hot), where 0 indicates thermal neutrality.
Shivering responses were assessed using the Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale (BSAS) ranging from 0 (no shivering) to 3 (severe shivering), with higher scores indicating greater shivering severity.
Coventry University
Other
Effects of Exercising in Cold-Water and Cold-Ambient Air Versus a Thermoneutral Equivalent on Appetite, Energy Intake, and Food Preference: A Crossover Study in Healthy Males
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07181694
Healthy Adult Male
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT07698873
Healthy Adult Male
Jeddah, Mecca Region, Saudi Arabia
View Trial DetailsNCT07650162
Cyclists, Healthy Adult Male
Katowice, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT07650006
Healthy, Healthy Adult Male
Istanbul, Büyükçekmece, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details