Upper-lower clear plastic retainers + Class III elastics
OtherAddition of Class III elastics to clear plastic retainers
NCT Number: NCT04911400
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of adding elastics to orthodontic retainers on the stability of class III correction and whether it reduces the need for jaw surgery.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
12 year–16 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Chatswood Orthodontics, Chatswood, New South Wales, Australia
Over the years many types of appliances have been recommended for retaining Class III correction in growing children such as intermaxillary splints, class III activator, Frankel 3, Class III twin block, continued use of face-mask and chin-cup. However, currently none of these are in routine use and there is no evidence on the long term effectiveness of any retention protocol for class III correction.
One of the most commonly used retainers following orthodontic treatment is clear plastic retainers. There are no studies that investigated whether using class III elastics in combination with clear plastic retainers improves the stability of class III correction and reduces the need for later jaw surgery.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Addition of Class III elastics to clear plastic retainers
Upper-lower clear plastic retainers
Time frame: 5 years
Measurement of overjet
Time frame: 5 years
Need for surgery assessed by a panel of orthodontists
Time frame: 5 years
The difference in SNA angle measured on cephalometric radiographs between groups
Time frame: 5 years
The difference in SNB angle measured on cephalometric radiographs between groups
Time frame: 5 years
The difference in ANB angle measured on cephalometric radiographs between groups
Time frame: 5 years
The difference in upper incisor angle measured on cephalometric radiographs between groups
Time frame: 5 years
The difference in lower incisor angle measured on cephalometric radiographs between groups
Time frame: 5 years
Questionnaire on the frequency and ease of use of both retainer regimens will be used
Time frame: 5 years
Little's irregularity index will be used to compare both groups
Time frame: 5 years
Presence of gingival recession and prominence of lower incisors will be evaluated for both groups
Sydney Local Health District
Other Gov
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07710391
Class III Malocclusion, Malocclusion
Baghdad, Iraq
View Trial DetailsNCT07706400
Children, Class III Malocclusion
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07581990
Class III Malocclusion, Facemask
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
View Trial DetailsNCT07279662
Class III Malocclusion, Congenital Abnormalities
Ankara, Yenimahalle, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details