Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05173636

Effects of Cervical Lateral Glide Along With Thoracic Mobilizations in Patients With Neurogenic Cervicobrachial Pain.

In the scientific literature, cervicobrachial pain is the presence of pain in the neck that radiates or refers to the arm. It is considered as common spine disorder with upper quadrant pain due to muscles, joints or intervertebral discs. This study aims to compare the effects of direct neural tissue technique that is cervical lateral glide mobilization along with indirect neural tissue mobilization technique that is thoracic mobilization on pain, range of motion, endurance of neck flexors and functional ability in patients with cervicobrachial pain.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Cervicobrachial Syndrome Neurologic Manifestations Pain Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Signs and Symptoms

Age range

25 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Benazir Bhutto Hospital

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 43600, Pakistan

About this study

The exact incidence of cervicobrachial pain syndrome is not known due to the paucity of population-based studies, patients suffering the symptoms of this condition frequently attend for physiotherapy.

In the scientific literature, cervicobrachial pain is the presence of pain in the neck that radiates or refers to the arm. It is considered as common spine disorder with upper quadrant pain due to muscles, joints or intervertebral discs. Upper quadrant discomfort involves neck, shoulder, arm, upper back but neural tissue sensitivity to mechanical stimuli portrays to be the essential element of cervicobrachial pain. It generally refers to neck pain that along with paresthesia is radiating to one upper extremity and leading to muscle imbalances. Elvey planned some clinical tests to recognize the problems of neurogenic disorders that are responsive to non-intrusive physical therapy treatment. The acceptability of these tests from effective treatments has not been adequately proven yet.

According to the literature cervical lateral glide is considered as first line treatment in reducing pain and improving upper limb function and is specifically very effective in patients of cervicobrachial pain syndrome. Cervical lateral glide has hypoalgesic effect on neck and arm pain. It is thought that this technique stimulates cervical afferents which can affect pain processes at spinal cord and cortical levels. A study was conducted in which passive techniques for mobilizing neural tissue and cervical spine were given as direct manual therapy treatment. Thoracic mobilization corresponds to indirect neural mobilization that is effective in reducing pain and functional limitations when incorporated with cervical spine mobilization that is referred as direct neural mobilization in patients of cervicobrachial pain. Evidence suggests that improvement in cervical stability and thoracic mobility achieved through manual therapy is significant in reducing neck pain and improving functional motion This study would help to investigate the delineation between specific and non-specific components of manual therapy. This study aims to compare the effects of direct neural tissue technique that is cervical lateral glide mobilization along with indirect neural tissue mobilization technique that is thoracic mobilization on pain, range of motion, endurance of neck flexors and functional ability in patients with cervicobrachial pain.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pain in upper quadrant associated with cervical spine eliciting unilateral neck pain.
  • Paresthesia and numbness in the neck and arm for at least three continuous months
  • Active movements of cervical spine (extension, lateral flexion to either side or ipsilateral rotations) and arm movements reproducing pain.
  • Symptom reproduction on passive movements in the same pattern as with active movements.
  • Elicitation of adverse response (in terms of range of movement and reproduction of symptoms) to neural tissue provocation testing of median, ulnar and radial nerves and subsequent symptom alteration with neural tissue differentiating maneuvers.
  • Tenderness at transverse processes of cervical spine (nerve roots), nerve trunks of median, ulnar and radial nerves at different anatomical locations in the course of respective neural tissue.
  • Hyperalgesic related cutaneous tissues on palpation (tender points).
  • Evidence of a related pathology (example: radiological evidence of cervical disc pathology in the vicinity of involved nerve roots or evidence of stenosis at cervical neural foramen as diagnosed by a qualified musculoskeletal Radiologist)
  • provoked or spontaneous paresthesia and pain with radicular distribution
  • Positive results in the following tests: Spurling, Distraction, and Upper Limb tension test.
  • Diagnosis will be based upon subjective presentation of patient's pain pattern which includes somatic referred pain and neurogenic radiating symptoms.

Exclusion criteria

  • Bilateral symptoms (due to unilateral nature of lateral glide mobilization technique).
  • History of spinal surgery
  • Systemic diseases besides neck pain.
  • Vertebral infections.
  • Presented red flags.
  • Used analgesics within 48 hours before initial assessment.

Treatment and study plan

cervical lateral glide

Other

A cervical segmental contralateral lateral glide treatment technique is performed at 1 or more motion segments of the cervical spine (C5-T1), including the level(s) of the segmental motion restriction. With the patient in a supine position, the therapist cradled the head and neck above, and including, the level to be treated and performed a lateral translatory movement away from the involved side while minimizing gross cervical side flexion or rotation.

thoracic mobilization technique

Other

Participants in group B will be given cervical lateral glide along with thoracic mobilization technique in prone position.

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric pain rating scale for pain

    Time frame: at base line

    Numeric pain rating scale is used to capture the patient's level of pain. Patients will be asked to indicate the intensity of current, best, and worst levels of pain over the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). This scale exhibit fair to moderate test-retest reliability and show adequate responsiveness in patients with neck pain. Assessment to be done at base line

  2. Numeric pain rating scale for pain

    Time frame: at 2nd week

    Numeric pain rating scale is used to capture the patient's level of pain. Patients will be asked to indicate the intensity of current, best, and worst levels of pain over the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). This scale exhibit fair to moderate test-retest reliability and show adequate responsiveness in patients with neck pain. Assessment to be done at 2nd week.

  3. Numeric pain rating scale for pain

    Time frame: at 4th week

    Numeric pain rating scale is used to capture the patient's level of pain. Patients will be asked to indicate the intensity of current, best, and worst levels of pain over the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). This scale exhibit fair to moderate test-retest reliability and show adequate responsiveness in patients with neck pain. Assessment to be done at 4th week.

  4. Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire (for physical function)

    Time frame: at baseline

    Function will be measured by the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire that is divided into nine-five parts sections. The questionnaire is easy for patients to complete, simple to score and provides an objective measure to evaluate outcome in patients with acute or chronic neck pain. This questionnaire has been demonstrated to have short-term repeatability and long-term sensitivity to change. Assessment to be done at baseline.

  5. Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire (for physical function)

    Time frame: at 2nd week

    Function will be measured by the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire that is divided into nine-five parts sections. The questionnaire is easy for patients to complete, simple to score and provides an objective measure to evaluate outcome in patients with acute or chronic neck pain. This questionnaire has been demonstrated to have short-term repeatability and long-term sensitivity to change. Assessment to be done at 2nd week.

  6. Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire (for physical function)

    Time frame: at 4th week

    Function will be measured by the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire that is divided into nine-five parts sections. The questionnaire is easy for patients to complete, simple to score and provides an objective measure to evaluate outcome in patients with acute or chronic neck pain. This questionnaire has been demonstrated to have short-term repeatability and long-term sensitivity to change. Assessment to be done at 4th week

  7. Cervical range of motion by Goniometer

    Time frame: at baseline

    cervical range of motion will be measured by using universal goniometer. It is a reliable tool for assessing cervical range of motion in a clinical setting and is cheap. Assessment to be done at baseline.

  8. Cervical range of motion by Goniometer

    Time frame: at 2nd week

    cervical range of motion will be measured by using universal goniometer. It is a reliable tool for assessing cervical range of motion in a clinical setting and is cheap. Assessment to be done at 2nd week.

  9. Cervical range of motion by Goniometer

    Time frame: at 4th week

    cervical range of motion will be measured by using universal goniometer. It is a reliable tool for assessing cervical range of motion in a clinical setting and is cheap. Assessment to be done at 4th week.

  10. Deep neck flexor endurance test

    Time frame: at baseline

    Neck flexor endurance will be measured with deep neck flexor endurance test(Rectus Capitus Anterior, Rectus Capitus Lateralis, Longus Capitus, Longus Colli). It will be performed in a supine lying position by tucking patients chin in and lifting off table 1 inch. The examiner will look for substitution of the platysma or sterno-cleido mastoid muscle. The flexor endurance test showed good intertester and intratester reliability when two values were averaged and, thus, may represent a useful clinical tool for practitioners involved in treating and preventing neck pain. Assessment to be done at baseline.

  11. Deep neck flexor endurance test

    Time frame: at 2nd week

    Neck flexor endurance will be measured with deep neck flexor endurance test(Rectus Capitus Anterior, Rectus Capitus Lateralis, Longus Capitus, Longus Colli). It will be performed in a supine lying position by tucking patients chin in and lifting off table 1 inch. The examiner will look for substitution of the platysma or sterno-cleido mastoid muscle. The flexor endurance test showed good intertester and intratester reliability when two values were averaged and, thus, may represent a useful clinical tool for practitioners involved in treating and preventing neck pain. Assessment to be done at 2nd week.

  12. Deep neck flexor endurance test

    Time frame: at 4th week

    Neck flexor endurance will be measured with deep neck flexor endurance test(Rectus Capitus Anterior, Rectus Capitus Lateralis, Longus Capitus, Longus Colli). It will be performed in a supine lying position by tucking patients chin in and lifting off table 1 inch. The examiner will look for substitution of the platysma or sterno-cleido mastoid muscle. The flexor endurance test showed good intertester and intratester reliability when two values were averaged and, thus, may represent a useful clinical tool for practitioners involved in treating and preventing neck pain. Assessment to be done at 4th week.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Cervical Lateral Glide Mobilizations Along With Thoracic Mobilizations in Patients With Neurogenic Cervicobrachial Pain.

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Dec 30, 2021
Registry last updated
Feb 2, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.