Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06506851

Effects of Augmented Reality-based Rapid Blood Transfusion (Level-1®)

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of AR-based training with traditional guideline-based self-learning in practical nurses without prior Level-1® experience. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does AR-based training using Microsoft HoloLens 2® improve clinical performance compared to traditional guideline-based self-learning? Does AR-based training affect self-efficacy and educational satisfaction compared to traditional methods?

Participants will:

Receive AR-based training using Microsoft HoloLens 2® (experimental group) Follow traditional guideline-based self-learning (control group) Researchers will compare the AR-based training group to the traditional self-learning group to see if AR-based training leads to better clinical performance, higher self-efficacy, and greater educational satisfaction.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Equipment and Supplies Augmented Reality Nurse's Role

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Samsung Medical Center

Seoul, 06351, South Korea

About this study

In critical situations like hypovolemic shock, nurses must master skills for using devices like the Level-1® rapid infusion system. However, limited exposure poses challenges. Augmented reality (AR) offers a solution by providing realistic practice scenarios. While AR has shown effectiveness in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and intubation education, its application in Level-1® training remains underexplored.

This study was conducted at the Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, Korea, and involved 42 practical nurses without prior Level-1® experience. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the experimental group, which received AR-based training using Microsoft HoloLens 2®, and the control group, which followed traditional guideline-based self-learning.

The study aimed to investigate the impact of AR-based Level-1® education on nurses' clinical performance, self-efficacy, and educational satisfaction. Clinical performance, self-efficacy, and educational satisfaction were assessed through structured measurements.

Results data and conclusions drawn from the data are excluded from this section and will be reported separately in the Results Section of the record.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Willingness to participate voluntarily and understanding of the study's purpose.
  • No prior experience with the Level-1® rapid infusion system.

Exclusion criteria

  • Failure to meet the inclusion criteria.
  • Prior experience with the Level-1® rapid infusion system.
  • Inability to comprehend the study's purpose or express voluntary participation.
  • Inability to attend required training and evaluations.

Treatment and study plan

AR-based Training with Microsoft HoloLens 2®

Other

Practical nurses in this group receive AR-based training using Microsoft HoloLens 2®. This training method incorporates augmented reality technology to provide immersive and interactive learning experiences, enhancing their proficiency in device utilization.

Traditional Guideline-based Self-Learning

Other

Practical nurses in this group follow traditional guideline-based self-learning methods without augmented reality technology. They rely on conventional educational materials and guidelines for learning device utilization skills.

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Competency

    Time frame: before training, immediately after training

    This measurement assesses nurses' clinical competency in rapid infusion procedures. It includes evaluation of learning time, performance time, accuracy, and assistance requests.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Self-efficacy

    Time frame: efore training, immediately after training

    This assessment measures nurses' self-efficacy in rapid infusion procedures using a modified self-efficacy scale. It evaluates confidence levels in performing tasks related to rapid infusion.

Other outcomes

  1. Educational Satisfaction Evaluation

    Time frame: Educational satisfaction will be assessed immediately after the completion of the training program.

    This evaluation assesses nurses' satisfaction with the educational program. It includes measures of confidence, relevance, and willingness to recommend the training to others using a structured questionnaire.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Samsung Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Augmented Reality-based Rapid Blood Transfusion (Level-1®) Education on Nurse's Clinical Competency, Self-efficacy, and Educational Satisfaction: Randomised Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Jul 18, 2024
Registry last updated
Jul 18, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.