Neurocognition and Emotion in Affective Disorders (NEAD) Centre, University of Copenhagen and Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Frederiksberg hospital
Copenhagen, Capital Region of Copenhagen, 1353, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT06121206
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effects of a three-week altitude-like cognition training intervention in healthy individuals (substudy 1) and symptomatically stable patients with mood disorders (depression or bipolar disorder; substudy 2). This multi-modal intervention consists of an adaptive cognitive training programme that participants complete while they're inside an altitude-training room with 12% O2, corresponding to 4400 meters altitude.
Across substudy 1 and 2, the investigators hypothesize that altitude-like cognition training has a beneficial effect on cognition after three-weeks treatment completion measured with a global cognition composite score (primary outcome measure). Further, the investigators hypothesize that hypoxia and cognition training will yield improved executive functioning after treatment completion and changes in brain activity during working memory in the dorsal prefrontal cortex 4 weeks after treatment completion (secondary outcome measures). In the patient study, the investigators further hypothesize that the intervention will have beneficial effects on daily-life cognition measured in virtual reality (VR) 4 weeks after treatment completion (secondary outcome measure in substudy 2). For exploratory purposes, the study will examine effects on additional measures of cognition, functioning and self-ratings scales (tertiary outcomes).
The investigators will compare the combination of altitude-like hypoxia (12%) and cognitive training with (1) hypoxia with no training, (2) cognitive training under normal oxygen levels (normoxia; 20%), and (3) normoxia with no training in healthy individuals (substudy 1). For patients with mood disorders (substudy 2) the effects of altitude-like hypoxia (12%) and cognitive training are compared to treatment as usual (TAU).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Copenhagen, Capital Region of Copenhagen, 1353, Denmark
ALTIBRAIN aims to test a novel model, linking altitude-like oxygen manipulations, endogenous erythropoietin (EPO) in the brain, neuroplasticity and cognition. Specifically, ALTIBRAIN will determine whether upregulation of endogenous brain EPO by altitude-like hypoxia cognition training is a fundamental mechanism of enduring neuroplasticity and long-lasting cognitive improvement in humans. This will be investigated in healthy individuals (substudy 1) and symptomatically stable patients with mood disorders (depression or bipolar disorder; substudy 2).
Substudy 1 involves four intervention groups: (1) altitude-like hypoxia (12%) combined with cognitive training, (2) hypoxia with no training, (3) cognitive training under normoxia (20%), and (4) normoxia with no training. Participants are randomised in blocks of four and undergo interventions in these groups for practical reasons. During the 3-weeks treatment, participants breathe 12% ambient oxygen (≈4400 meters altitude) or normal sea-level oxygen (20%) in a treatment room, 3.5 hours daily, six days per week. On iPads, they perform cognitive training or matched control games without cognitive benefits. Cognitive training is interleaved by short breaks, during which the participants can relax or walk on a treadmill inside the room. Participants undergo cognition assessments in weeks 1 (baseline), 4 and 8 and functional and structural MRI in weeks 1 and 8, when red blood cells are comparable between groups. A subgroup will also undergo PET scanning in week 4.
In substudy 2, patients are randomized to either (1) altitude-like hypoxia (12%) combined with cognitive training, 3.5 hours daily, five-six days per week for three weeks or (2) treatment as usual (TAU). After completed testing, patients in the TAU group undergo the 3-week active intervention, followed by an additional session of neurocognitive testing in the week after treatment completion. All remaining study procedures are identical to substudy 1.
The power calculation was based on the primary hypothesis that altitude-like hypoxia combined with cognitive training produces robust sustained cognitive improvement compared with normoxia and no training. To accommodate for up to a 15% drop-out, we will include 30 participants per group; i.e., 120 healthy individuals and 60 patients to obtain complete data for minimum 26 participants per group, i.e., 104 healthy individuals and 52 patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
(substudy 1):
Inclusion criteria
(substudy 2):
Common Exclusion Criteria:
Fresh air with 12% O2, is blown into a sealed 20 m³ room by a 4kW air compressor with a safety-approved system developed by HöhenBalance, Austria. After participants enter the room, the O2 levels will be reduced from 16% to 12% (≈ 4,400 meters altitude) in a 30 minutes lead-in phase. The target O2 level of 12% will be maintained over three hours
Fresh air with 20% O2, is blown into a sealed 20 m³ room by a 4kW air compressor with a safety-approved system developed by HöhenBalance, Austria. The target O2 level of 20% will be maintained over 3.5 hours
The web-based cognitive training (Happy Neuron Pro) is grounded on principles of neuroplasticity-based learning by being intensive, neuroadaptive, engaging and rewarding. The active training involves parametric task adjustment by decreasing stimuli presentation time, increasing working memory load, decreasing time to respond, and increasing the number of non-target items (distractors).
Participants in the no training control condition receive computer games similar to Happy Neuron Pro but with low cognitive demand that produce no cognitive benefits. Specifically, this sham procedure involves the exact same stimuli as the active condition but with changes from trial to trial only in the appearance of the tasks.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment. Primary outcome assessement time point), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
A cognitive composite based on an average of Z-transformed scores from the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Coding, verbal fluency with the letter "D", WAIS-III Letter-Number Sequencing, Trail Making Test B (TMT B) and Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVP) speed for correct responses from Cambridge Cognition (CANTAB). No score range. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment. Secondary outcome assessement time point), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Neuropsychological test assessing executive functions. No score range. Lower scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 8
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measure of brain activity during a working memory task.
Time frame: Baseline, week 8 (secondary outcome assessment time point) (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Self-administered 360º immersive virtual reality test in a kitchen, where the participant's abilities to plan and prepare a meal are assessed. The test involves five subtasks probing verbal memory, executive functions, processing speed, working memory and sustained attention, which are summarized in a composite score. No score range. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Neuropsychological test assessing verbal memory. Outcomes include total recall (score range 0-75), immediate recall (score range 0-15), and delayed recall (score range 0-15). Higher scores mean a better outcome
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Neuropsychological test assessing attention and processing speed. Scored as time to complete. A higher time means a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Neuropsychological test assessing executive functions. Scored as time to complete. A higher time means a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Neuropsychological test assessing attention. Score range 0-89. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Neuropsychological test assessing executive functions. Score range 0-16. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Neuropsychological test assessing executive functions. Score range 0-21. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Neuropsychological test assessing executive functions. No score range. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment) and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Neuropsychological test assessing sustained attention. Outcomes include signal detection (score range 0-1, higher scores mean a better outcome), probability of hit (score range 0-1, higher scores mean a better outcome), total false alarms (score range 0-546, higher scores mean a worse outcome), and latency to correct (score range 100-1900, higher scores mean a worse outcome).
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment) and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Neuropsychological test assessing visual working memory. Outcomes include errors (score range 0-153, higher scores mean a worse outcome) and strategy (score range 3-26, higher scores mean a worse outcome).
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment) and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Neuropsychological test assessing executive functions. Apart from mean choices to correct (secondary outcome), outcomes include problems solved on first choice (score range 1-15, higher scores mean a better outcome), and latency to correct (no score range, higher scores mean a worse outcome).
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment) and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Neuropsychological test assessing social cognition. Outcomes include reaction time (no score range, higher scores mean a worse outcome) and hit rate (score range 0-1, higher scores mean a better outcome).
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment) and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Neuropsychological test assessing executive function. No score range. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
The CAVIR test is a self-administered 360º immersive VR test in a kitchen, where the participant's abilities to plan and prepare a meal are assessed. The test involves five subtasks probing verbal memory, executive functions, processing speed, working memory and sustained attention. No score range. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Questionnaire on quality of life. Score range 33-176. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Questionnaire on quality of life. Score range 26-130. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Questionnaire on subjective cognitive complaints. Score range 0-48. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Questionnaire on occupational functioning. Score range 0-40. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Questionnaire on daily functioning. Score range 0-30. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 (end of treatment), and week 8 (+end of treatment follow-up for patients in treatment as usual group)
Questionnaire on sleep quality. Score range 0-21. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline and week 8
Clinical interview on daily functioning. Score range 0-72. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital
Other
Altitude-like Cognition Training to Target Brain Erythropoietin as a Novel Mechanism of Long-lasting Neuroplasticity and Cognitive Functions
Acronym: ALTIBRAIN
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06038955
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Frederiksberg, Capital Region of Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT04418856
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Reykjavik, Iceland
View Trial DetailsNCT06487611
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT05917379
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Hefei, Anhui, China
View Trial Details