Indiana CTSI Clinical Research Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
NCT Number: NCT02341274
Amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) formulations are increasingly used by the pharmaceutical industry to develop poorly water-soluble drugs into effective oral dosage forms. Examples include the antifungal drug itraconazole, the HIV protease inhibitor combination, lopinavir/ritonavir and the immunosuppressive, tacrolimus. There is potential for significant variation in bioavailability of ASD and thus heightened concern regarding the therapeutic efficacy as generic versions of these poorly water-soluble compounds become approved. The variation in bioavailability is to be expected because of our limited understanding of the precise physical chemistry of drug polymer amorphous solid dispersion formulations.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–49 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
The specific aim is to conduct a randomized, single dose, four-treatment, four-period cross-over bioequivalence (BE) study in 24 healthy normal adult volunteers (males and non-gravid females) to evaluate the in vivo performance of fresh and aged brand name and generic amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) preparations of tacrolimus. The pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus as fresh Prograf® and aged Prograf®, fresh generic tacrolimus capsules and aged generic tacrolimus capsule will be determined and compared in healthy volunteers. The hypothesis to be tested is that the tacrolimus in the amorphous solid dispersion formulation will be partially crystalized upon treatment with controlled heat and humidity and will demonstrate lower absorption (lower relative bioavailability) compared to the fresh product. Moreover, the expectation is that the heat- and humidity-stressed generic formulations will not be robust to crystallization as the stressed brand name drug and will demonstrate a decreased in vivo performance and loss of bioequivalence.
A total of 24 healthy female and male volunteers (age 18 to 49 years old) will be recruited to participate in this study. Volunteers will be determined to be free of significant medical conditions as assessed by medical history, physical examination, and blood and urine tests. Volunteers will be randomly allocated to receive one of the four treatment sequence groups and, on each occasion, receive one of the following: Fresh Prograf (RLD), fresh generic tacrolimus, 10-30% crystallized generic (Low Crystal), and 40-60% crystallized generic (High Crystal) tacrolimus. There will be a minimum 2-week washout between treatments. On each occasion, healthy volunteers will be administered tacrolimus, 5 mg, as a single capsule orally on an empty stomach with approximately 240 mL of water. Blood samples will be collected from the indwelling venous catheter (∼10 ml) after 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours after dosing. Subjects will be regularly monitored during this time. The volunteers will be allowed to eat a normal lunch 3 hours after taking their tacrolimus dose.
The primary endpoints will be the maximum blood concentration (Cmax) and the area under the curve (AUC) from zero to 24 hours and the AUC extrapolated from zero to infinity for tacrolimus for this bioequivalence study as recommended by the FDA guidance for industry. We will compute the AUC (from zero to 24 hours) to the last time point with measurable concentration using the linear trapezoidal rule and the AUC from time zero to time infinity with extrapolation computed as the quotient of the last measurable concentration and the terminal slope of the log concentration vs. time curve. In addition, we will report half-life of tacrolimus estimated from the terminal slope of the concentration vs. time plot determined by linear least squares regression. The peak blood tacrolimus concentration (Cmax,) and the time to Cmax (Tmax,) will be determined by visual inspection of the individual subject concentration-time curves.
A treatment will be considered bioequivalent if the geometric least square mean ratios and 90% confidence interval for Cmax and AUC fall between 0.80 to 1.25 of the fresh Prograf®.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Bioequivalence study
Other names: FK-506, FK506, D016559, WM0HAQ4WNM
Time frame: 24 hours
Ten blood samples (10 mL) will be obtained at zero time (baseline) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours after oral administration of 5 mg capsule of tacrolimus. Each healthy volunteer will be given a single oral dose of tacrolimus, 5 mg, on four separate occasions with at least a 2 week washout between study days. The peak exposure will be assessed by measuring the peak blood concentration (Cmax) obtained directly from the data. The treatment arms (aged Prograf®, fresh generic, aged generic) will be compared to fresh Prograf®. If the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the measures in the treatment arms to the fresh Prograf is within the limits of 0.8 to 1.25 for the Cmax, the treatment measures will be judged bioequivalent.
Time frame: 24 hours
Ten blood samples (10 mL) will be obtained at zero time (baseline) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours after oral administration of 5 mg capsule of tacrolimus. Each healthy volunteer will be given a single oral dose of tacrolimus, 5 mg, on four separate occasions with at least a 2 week washout between study days. The AUC will be computed using the linear trapezoidal rule. The total exposure will be assessed by comparing the AUC from zero to 24 hours and the AUC from zero to infinity. The treatment arms (aged Prograf®, fresh generic, aged generic) will be compared to fresh Prograf®. If the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the measures in the treatment arms to the fresh Prograf is within the limits of 0.8 to 1.25 for the AUC, the treatment measures will be judged bioequivalent.
Indiana University
Other
Effects of Altered Formulation on the Bioequivalence of Tacrolimus in Healthy Female and Male Volunteers
Acronym: ASDBioequiv
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07698288
Bioequivalence
Mexico City, Mexico
View Trial DetailsNCT06987773
Bioequivalence
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07345130
Bioavailability, Bioequivalence
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07393022
Bioequivalence, Health Adult Subjects
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details