The Danish Comitee for Health Education
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT02136056
The purpose of the current study is to determine the efficacy of a self-management course for workers on sick-leave as an add-on to standard rehabilitation care and follow-up (treatment as usual). Outcomes are registry based measures of return to work, and questionnaire based measures of well-being and quality of life.
We thus, hypothesize that the program will improve workers return to work rates and self-reported/psychological well-being.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
The intervention course is a Danish adaptation of The Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP), tailored towards workers on sick-leave. The original program has been developed by The Stanford Patient Education Research Center. The translation and adaptation has been conducted by The Danish Committee for Health Education.
Previous studies have examined the program with respect to specific chronic diseases (e.g., Arthritis), quality of life, well-being and health-care utilization, though non-otherwise specified workers on sick-leave and return work have not been examined before.
The framework of CDSMP is social-cognitive learning theory in which self-efficacy plays a central role.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A self-management course
Other names: Stanford patient education
Time frame: Weekly from baseline till 1 year follow-up
DREAM-registry (supported by the Danish Ministry of Employment) combined with income/employment information from e-income (supported by the Danish Tax Authorities).
Time frame: up to 5 month follow-up
WHO-5 Well-being and WHO Quality of Life/Satisfaction items (Bech, 2012)
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
The CMDQ questionnaire i based on SCL-90 (Symptom Checklist) and measures somatization, health-anxiety, depression, anxiety and alcohol consumption (Christensen et al., 2005)
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
The University of Washington Self-efficacy scale, 6 item version (Amtmann et al., 2012)
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
Return to work self-regulation questionnaire, measuring internalization of reasons for trying to return to work; adapted from the Treatment Self-regulation Questionnaire (Levesque et al., 2007)
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
A measure of six cognitive strategies which are taught at the course (Lorig et al., 1996)
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
A measure of 8 items measuring the threat of illness or disease (B-IPQ; Broadbent, Petrie, Main & Weinman, 2006)
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
Items that measure utilization of health-care consultation (Lorig et al., 1996)
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
Generic items that measure consumption of medicines such as anti-depressants and anxiety medicine, use of pain killers and sleep pills
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
Adherence to disease specific treatment (inspired by the MMAS-4; Morisky & DiMatteo, 2011)
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention and 4.5 month follow-up
Pain, breath, being tired, sleep quality; measured by VAS scales (Lorig et al., 1996)
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
Generic items that measures how the advantages and disadvantages of returning to work are balanced (Franche & Krause, 2002)
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention and 4,5 month follow-up
Generic items that measure expectations about returning to work (Niewenhuiksen, Noordik, van Dijk & van der Klink. 2013; Schultz et al., 20014)
University of Aarhus
Other
Effects of a Self-management Course for Adults on Sick-leave; Outcomes in Registry Based Measures of Return to Work and Questionnaire Based Measures of Well-being and Quality of Life
Acronym: jos
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.