Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03470740

Effects of a Rheumatoid Arthritis Self-management Program

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a persistent systemic disease. WHO (World Health Organization) commented that a crucial goal of heath care for RA is prevention of loss of daily function by patients' self-management (SM) skills; however, a comprehensive rheumatoid arthritis self-management (RASm) for RA patients' day-to-day self-managing is limited in Taiwan.

Aims: The aims of the study are: (1) to implement the RASm program, (2) to determine the effectiveness of the program with 6 months follow-up, and (3) to understand participants' experiences when receiving the RASm program for the experimental group.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis Autoimmune Diseases Connective Tissue Diseases Immune System Diseases Joint Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases Rheumatic Diseases Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Age range

20 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Taoyuan, 33303, Taiwan

About this study

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a persistent systemic disease. WHO (World Health Organization) commented that a crucial goal of heath care for RA is prevention of loss of daily function by patients' self-management (SM) skills; however, a comprehensive rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for RA patients' day-to-day self-managing is limited in Taiwan. The aims of the study are: (1) to implement the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program, and (2) to determine the effectiveness of the program with 6 months follow-up. The project will design to implement and evaluate the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program for RA patients using two groups experimental design. A medical center in northern Taiwan will be selected and patients who visited the RA departments will be eligible for the study if they are: (1) diagnosed with RA, (2) age of 20 years or over, (3) disease considered have been stable for at least 3 months, and (4) able to understand and comply with the study treatment. After completion of baseline data, patients will be randomly allocated to the intervention or control group using a computerized allocation procedure and follow the CONSORT flow diagram. Control patients received usual care, and the intervention group will receive the 6-week rheumatoid arthritis self-management program which based on self-efficacy theory. The independent variable of the program will be the four information include mastery experience, social modeling, social persuasion and physical and emotional states, and the strategies involve education, goal setting and attainment, self-monitoring, and phone calls. All participants will follow up for 6 months, and the data will be collected at the baseline, and 2, 3, and 6 months. The statistics with the GEE (generalized estimating equation) analysis will be used to evaluate the outcomes such as the disease activity (DAS-28), arthritis self-efficacy (ASE), physical functioning (MHAQ), quality of life (SF-36), and self-management behaviors. Through enhance the capacity of self-management program for the RA cases to reduce the health care utilization and patients' and caregivers' burden.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with RA
  • Age of 20 years or over
  • Disease considered have been stable for at least 3 months
  • Able to understand and comply with the study treatment

Exclusion criteria

  • Suffering from other terminal illnesses, severe dementia or another debilitating psychiatric disorder
  • Living in a long-term care facility
  • Participation in another research protocol

Treatment and study plan

rheumatoid arthritis self-management program

Behavioral

The intervention group received the rheumatoid arthritis self-management program which was based on Bandura's theory of self-efficacy and proposes that self-efficacy is influenced by four information sources: mastery of experience, social modeling, social persuasion and one's physical and emotional states. To enhance participants' self-management skill, the following strategies were employed: peer story-telling, assessment, family involvement, goal setting, self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and phone calls consultation.

Primary outcomes

  1. Disease Activity

    Time frame: 6 months

    Disease activity was measured using the DAS-28 (Disease Activity Score-28) which evaluated 28 tender and swollen joint counts of rheumatoid arthritis patients. This scale was used to calculate the 28 tender and swollen joint counts. Scores can range from 0 to 9.4. The lower score represent a better RA outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Arthritis Self-efficacy- Pain

    Time frame: 6 months

    We used the arthritis self-efficacy-pain (ASE-pain) to measure RA patients' pain self-efficacy. The ASE-pain used visual analogue scales (0-10), in which 0 means 'very uncertain' and 10 means 'very certain'; a higher score refers to higher self-efficacy. This scale have 5 items, therefore, the score range will be 0-50.

  2. Arthritis Self-efficacy- Other

    Time frame: 6 months

    We used the arthritis self-efficacy-other (ASE-OS) to measure RA patients' other symptoms self-efficacy. The ASE-OS used visual analogue scales (0-10), in which 0 means 'very uncertain' and 10 means 'very certain'; a higher score refers to higher self-efficacy. This scale have 6 items, therefore, the score range will be 0-60.

  3. SF-36 Quality of life_Physical Component Scores

    Time frame: 6 months

    The Short-form 36 includes one multi-item scale that assesses 8 dimensions of health: physical functioning (PF), social functioning (SF), role limitations because of physical health problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), general mental health (psychological distress and well-being; MH), limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems (RE), vitality (energy and fatigue; VT), and general health perceptions (GH), was used to assess the quality of life in this study. The original scale using the Likert scoring method, the score is from 1-3 or 1-5. Before the scores are added, we follow the SF-36 manual, adjust each item scored from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating extreme problems and 100 indicating no problems. The physical component scores (PCS) included GH, PF, RP, and BP, then the scores of each sub-question under the Physical Component Scores are summed together, and the range after adjustment from 0 (extreme problems) to 400 (no problems) for the Physical Component Scores.

  4. Physical Functioning

    Time frame: 6 months

    The 8-item Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire was used to measure the physical functioning for this study. The MHAQ measures eight activities such as dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach grip, and common daily activities. Items are rated from 1 = without difficulty, to 4 = unable to do; a lower score indicates a greater ability to conduct daily activities. The range of the score will be 8-32.

  5. Self-management Behaviors

    Time frame: 6 months

    To assess self-management behaviors the researchers developed a joint activity and protection self-management behaviors scale. The scale consists of eight items and ranges from zero for 'never' to four for 'always'. Higher scores indicate a higher level of use of each of the self-management behavior. The range of the score will be 0-32.

  6. SF-36 Quality of Life_Mental Component Scores (MCS)

    Time frame: 6 Months

    The Short-form 36 includes one multi-item scale that assesses 8 dimensions of health: physical functioning (PF), social functioning (SF), role limitations because of physical health problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), general mental health (psychological distress and well-being; MH), limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems (RE), vitality (energy and fatigue; VT), and general health perceptions (GH), was used to assess the quality of life in this study. The original scale using the Likert scoring method, the score is from 1-3 or 1-5. Before the scores are added, we follow the SF-36 manual, adjust each item scored from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating extreme problems and 100 indicating no problems. The mental component scores (MCS) included RE, SF, VT, and MH, then the scores of each sub-question under the Mental Component Scores are summed together, and the range after adjustment from 0 (extreme problems) to 400 (no problems) for the Mental Component Scores.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of a Rheumatoid Arthritis Self-management program-a Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Mar 20, 2018
Registry last updated
Aug 22, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.