Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4, Canada
NCT Number: NCT04830566
Non-specific low back pain is a worldwide health issue that remains poorly understood. Some authors have shown that the thoracolumbar fascia of low back pain adults presents changes in biomechanical properties. As it is richly endowed with pain receptors, the thoracolumbar fascia could therefore be a key contributor to this chronic pain condition. Myofascial techniques (MFTs) are commonly used in manual therapy by practitioners of various backgrounds to address fascia biomechanical properties, but there is a paucity of objective evidence on their effects on tissue state. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography, sonoelastography and myometry are emerging imaging techniques that can quantify the biomechanical properties of fascia and underlying muscle. These innovative techniques could in turn contribute to a better understanding of MFTs effects on fascial properties.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the immediate effect of a standardized MFT on the elastography features of the lumbar paraspinal muscle and fascia (i.e. myofascial unit). The secondary objectives are to evaluate the immediate effects of a MFT on: i) ultrasonography features of the myofascial unit; ii) myometry features of the myofascial unit; ii) pain intensity.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4, Canada
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Myofascial technique on the thoracolumbar fascia and lumbar paraspinal muscles
Superficial hands contact on the lumbar area
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment), post-treatment (immediately after treatment)
Evaluated with a shear wave sonoelastography device.
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) post-treatment (immediately after treatment)
Evaluated with a B-mode ultrasound imaging device
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) post-treatment (immediately after treatment)
Evaluated with a myotonometer
Time frame: Baseline (before treatment) post-treatment (immediately after treatment), at day 2 and at day 7 after the intervention
Numeric rating Scale (0 to 10; minimum = 0; maximum = 10; higher score means worst outcome)
Université de Sherbrooke
Other
Effects of a Myofascial Technique on Biomechanical Properties of the Lumbar Paraspinal Muscle and Thoracolumbar Fascia in Chronic Low Back Pain Adults Assessed by Elastography, Ultrasonography and Myometry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07727525
Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07694219
Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain
Lahore, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT06810245
Agnosia, Arthritis
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04747314
Anxiety Disorders, Back Pain
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details