Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05582863

Effects of a 12-week VR Intervention on the Functional Fitness of Adults of Different Age Ranges

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a 12-week VR fitness intervention on the functional fitness of adults of different age ranges.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

65 year–84 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

NTNU

Taipei, 106, Taiwan

About this study

Previous studies have shown age-related decreases in physical activity and functional fitness among older adults. Virtual Reality (VR) exercise programs are currently used in leisure and entertainment to improve the physical health of older adults. However, VR exercise in assessing physical health or functional fitness in older adults of different age ranges is rare. To fill this research gap, VR exercise was to assess functional fitness improvement in young and middle-aged participants.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • aged more 65 and less 84 years
  • with no listening/vision impairments
  • who did not have any history of illness based on their response to the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q)
  • interested in the virtual reality exercise

Exclusion criteria

  • age less than 65 or more than 84 years
  • disability and unable to live independently

Treatment and study plan

Virtual reality exercise intervention

Other

The experimental group performed a 75-90-minute VR exercise routine twice a week for 12 weeks.

Primary outcomes

  1. Senior Fitness Test

    Time frame: Senior Functional fitness to specify a period "change" is being assessed. The time points for assessment were week 1 (pre-test), and 12 (post-test).

    The Senior Fitness Test was used to assess the functional fitness of the participants. The test has six items and evaluations of four physical functional dimensions using the following movements: Back scratch was assessed for upper body flexibility (units of measurement: cm). Chair sit-and-reach movement evaluates lower body flexibility (cm). Arm curl movement assesses upper body strength (times). Chair-stand test evaluates lower body muscle strength (times). 2-minute step exercise evaluates cardiorespiratory fitness (times). 8-foot up-and-go evaluates balance and agility, (sec).

    The back scratch, chair-and-reach, arm curl, chair stand, and 2-minute step of higher scores mean better functional fitness. The 8-foot up-and-go of higher scores means poorer functional fitness.

    The study measures the change in functional fitness of older adults from a 1-week baseline to 12 weeks (i.e., exercise intervention phase).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Weight and Kilograms test

    Time frame: Not assessing change.The test was only a one-time measure at week 1(pre-test).

    Measure older adults of height by attaching cloth ruler tape to the wall (e.g., height in centimeters).

    The weight of the elderly is measured using commercially available electronic weighing machines. (e.g., weight in kilograms).

    The height and weight measurements of older people are aggregated to produce a reported value (e.g., weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m2).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan Normal University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of a 12-week Virtual Reality-based Fitness Intervention on the Functional Fitness of Adults of Different Age Ranges

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Oct 17, 2022
Registry last updated
Oct 17, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.