Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05349955

Effects and Safety of Diabetic GUideline Algorithm Implementation Performed by Primary Care Physicians in the Community

The Effects and Safety of Diabetic GUideline Algorithm Implementation in the Community (GUARD-Community) study is a 2-arm, cluster-randomized control trial to evaluate the effect and safety of guideline algorithm intervention performed by primary care physicians on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in elderly patients with high risk in community.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

About this study

Diabetes is an important public health concern. Elderly diabetic patients are characterized by a long duration and complications, including chronic kidney disease and/or cardiovascular disease. In the past 30 years, the guidelines of CDS, EASD or ADA have been frequently updated. The latest guideline on pharmacological algorithm recommend that patients with cardiovascular, renal disease or very high/high CV risk patients should be treated with anti-diabetic drugs presenting target organ protection, including SGLT2i and GLP1RA. And the guideline recommend comprehensive control of the cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension and dyslipidemia.

This GUARD-Community study is a community based cluster-randomized controlled trial and will enroll 5600 or more participants in more than 120 clusters aged ≥ 65 years with T2DM and complicated with high/very high cardiovascular risk factors . The trial will evaluate the the effects and safety of intensive "Guideline" algorithm implementation on CVD and renal outcomes. The primary hypothesis is that guideline algorithm intervention implemented by primary care physicians will significantly reduce the risk of 4-point MACE (comprised of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke or hospitalization of heart failure) rates. In Phase 1 study, the control of blood sugar, blood pressure and lipids will be evaluated at 18 months after intervention. In Phase 2 study, the CVD and renal outcomes will be evaluated at 3 years. The study will last for 4 years.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • ①Males or females aged 65 and above (≥65) receive treatment from the local community health service center;
  • ②Diagnosed type 2 diabetes (ADA criteria):
  • A. Typical symptoms of diabetes + random blood sugar ≥ 11.1mmol/L;
  • B. Fasting blood glucose (FPG) ≥ 7.0mmol/L (fasting blood glucose is defined as no caloric intake within 8 hours);
  • C. Oral glucose tolerance test 2h blood glucose (OGTT) ≥ 11.1mmol/L (2h after meal);
  • D. have been treated with antidiabetic drugs;
  • Each blood sugar test must be repeated to confirm the diagnosis;
  • ③Complicated with chronic kidney disease and/or very high/high risk of cardiovascular disease, meet any one of the following:
  • A. ASCVD, including coronary heart disease, cerebral infarction, peripheral vascular disease;
  • B. Or target organ damage (albuminuria, renal impairment with eGFR ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73m2, left ventricular hypertrophy or retinopathy);
  • C. ≥ 3 major risk factors (age ≥ 65 years old, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, obesity );
  • D. Diabetes duration ≥ 10 years, with any one traditional cardiovascular risk factor such as advanced age, obesity, smoking, sedentary, family history of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, abnormal lipid metabolism.

Exclusion criteria

  • ①Pregnant women or women planning to become pregnant;
  • ②eGFR<30 mL/min/1.73m2 (CKD-EPI formula);
  • ③Patient cannot be followed up for 36 months (due to health condition or migration);
  • ④Unwilling or unable to sign the informed consent;
  • ⑤Type 1 diabetes;

Treatment and study plan

Intensive guideline algorithm implementation

Other

Diabetes guideline pharmacological algorithm will be implemented by primary care physicians in community. In brief, SGLT2i or GLP-1RA will be recommended to control blood glucose in priority when subjects at very high/high CV risk and meet the target HbA1C<7%, control blood pressure <130/80mmHg, LDL-c<1.8mmol/L at very high CV risk patients or <2.6mmol/L at high CV risk patients, and antiplatelet as secondary prevention of ASCVD.

Conventional guideline algorithm implementation

Other

The guideline intervention is based the guidance which the local physicians followed through self learning and education. The management of diabetes paitients will be decided by local physicians.

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Outcome of Phase 1: Comprehensive management effect of various cardiovascular risk factors in T2D,meeting control targets for a combination of A1c, BP, LDL-C.

    Time frame: 18 months since randomization

    The proportion of participants with HbA1C<7.0%, blood pressure< 130/80 mm Hg,LDL-c<1.8mmol/L at very high CV risk or <2.6mmol/L at high CV risk.

  2. Primary Outcome of Phase 2: Composite of 3P MACE and hospitalization for heart failure.

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Time to occurrence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal Stroke, hospitalization for heart failure.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Outcome of Phase 1: Glycemic control rate

    Time frame: 18 months since randomization

    The proportion of participants with tight glucose control, targeting HbA1c <7.0%

  2. Secondary Outcome of Phase 1: Mean HbA1C changes

    Time frame: 18 months since randomization

    Mean HbA1C changes of participants

  3. Secondary Outcome of Phase 1: Mean systolic and diastolic pressure changes

    Time frame: 18 months since randomization

    Mean systolic and diastolic pressure changes of participants

  4. Secondary Outcome of Phase 1: Mean LDL-c changes

    Time frame: 18 months since randomization

    Mean LDL-c changes of participants

  5. Secondary Outcome of Phase 1: Adherence to guideline algorithm medication recommendation rate

    Time frame: 18 months since randomization

    Use electronic medical recorded prescription and questionnaires to assess the proportion of participants who adhere to guideline recommended medication

  6. Secondary Outcome of Phase 2: Incident or worsening nephropathy

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Time to composite of incident macroalbuminuria (UACR >300 mg/g), a sustained decline in eGFR (decrease in the eGFR of 30% or more to a value of less than 60 when baseline ≥60ml per minute per 1.73 m2, decrease in the eGFR of 50% or more when baseline <60ml per minute per 1.73 m2)from baseline, or chronic renal replacement therapy, or renal death.

  7. Secondary Outcome of Phase 2: Cardiorenal composite endpoint

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Time to eGFR (CKD-EPI formula) decrease, renal replacement therapy, renal or cardiovascular death

  8. Secondary Outcome of Phase 2: 3P MACE

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Time to events occurence: cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke

  9. Secondary Outcome of Phase 2: New onset of macroalbuminuria.

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Time to UACR>300mg/g

  10. Secondary Outcome of Phase 2: Changes of myocardial ischemia in electrocardiogram (ECG)

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Participants number of ECG ischemia demonstration occurence: ST-T segment depression more than 0.1mv in two adjacent leads of ECG compared with baseline, poor R wave progression.

  11. Secondary Outcome of Phase 2: New onset of albuminuria

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Time to UACR increase from <30mg/g to ≥30mg/g

  12. Secondary Outcome of Phase 2: Albuminuria progression

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Time to albuminuria progression: UACR increased by ≥30% and grade progression (ie, from normal to micro or macro, or from micro to macro)

  13. Secondary Outcome of Phase 2: Albuminuria regression

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Time to albuminuria regression: UACR grade regression(ie, from macro to micro or normal, or from micro to normal), and the UACR value decreases by more than or equal to 30%

  14. Secondary Outcome of Phase 2: Changes in the ratio of patients with normal or abnormal urine protein at the end of the study

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Rate change of normal or abnormal UACR. Normal means UACR<30mg/g. Abnormal means UACR≥30mg/g

  15. Secondary Outcome of Phase 2: Slope of eGFR decline

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Decrease of the eGFR over time

  16. Secondary Outcome of Phase 2: Retinopathy changes

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Occurrence or regression of retinopathy(ETDRS-DRSS)

  17. Secondary Outcome of Phase 2: Body weight change

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Absolute weight change and the percentage change of body weight

  18. Secondary Outcome of Phase 2: Changes of fatty liver prevalence

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Rate change of fatty liver.

  19. Secondary Outcome of Phase 2: Changes in beta-cell function

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Absolute change assessed by HOMA2-%β method

  20. Secondary Outcome of Phase 2: Changes in cognitive function

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Improvement or progression of cognitive function: The Mini-CogTM scale

  21. Secondary Outcome of Phase 2: The FRAIL scale

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Changes of the simple frailty questionnaire score

  22. Secondary Outcome of Phase 2: All-cause death

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Time to the death due to any cause

Other outcomes

  1. Health Economics Indicators

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Cost-effectiveness analysis: quantification of Incremental Cost Ratio Life Cycle (ICER) and Quality Adjusted Years (QALYs)

  2. Changes in cardiovascular risk indicators

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Framingham score

  3. Serology and urine testing

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Biomarkers associated with diagnosis or prognosis: using "omics" screening.

  4. Genomics testing

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Gene polymorphism testing for drug response or prognosis: using genome-wide association study(GWAS) screening.

  5. The time rate of glycemic target range

    Time frame: 3 years since randomization

    Continous glucose monitor detection

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Xiaomu Li, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

13661676591

Xiaoying Li, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

13651913857

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effects and Safety of GUideline Algorithm Based Intervention on CaRdiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Elderly Diabetic Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk in the Community- A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (GUARD-Community Study)

Acronym: GUARD

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Apr 27, 2022
Registry last updated
May 14, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.