Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05168319

Effects and Mechanism of Prolonged Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation on Neuropathic Pain

Neuropathic pain (NP) is one type of refractory chronic pain condition,medical treatments for NP is limited because of its poorly response. A noninvasive brain-stimulation method called transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has garnered interest as an alternative treatment for intractable NP potentially through inducing therapeutic brain plasticity.Indeed, high-frequency (≥ 5 Hz) Repetitive TMS (rTMS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) is suggested to be able to reduce neuropathic pain in randomized controlled studies.Overall, the clinical application of rTMS in chronic pain is still limited by the response rate,the investigation of rTMS protocols is important for improving rTMS analgesia. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) mimics the bursts of neuronal firing which results in robust long-term potentiation. Continuous TBS (cTBS) is designed to decrease excitability, whereby prolonged cTBS (pcTBS, i.e. multiple cTBS being delivered continuously) has recently been demonstrated to increase excitability. More importantly, pcTBS was found to have comparable or even better analgesic effects than standard 10 Hz rTMS. These findings together call for more studies to validate the analgesic efficacy of pcTBS.

In this study, the investigators aim to assess and compare the efficacy of prolonged continuous theta burst stimulation (pcTBS) with 10HZ rTMS in NP patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University hangzhou

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

About this study

The investigators designed a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study at 1 center. fifty NP patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups. A series of 5 daily pcTBS(1200 pulses/session) or 10-Hz rTMS (1500 pulses/session) of primary motor cortex (M1) or sham stimulation was applied to each patients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • (1)woman or man over 18 and under 70 years old; (2)pain fulfilling the criteria for probable or definite peripheral neuropathic pain ; (3) pain for at least 3 months, continuous pain (at least four days per week), at least moderate intensity (≥ 4/10 assessed by VAS) ; (4) stable pharmacological treatment for pain at least 2 weeks before inclusion; (5) able to cooperate in completing questionnaire.

Exclusion criteria

  • (1) Any clinically significant or unstable ongoing medical or psychiatric disorder including major depression; (2) History of substance abuse (alcohol, drugs); (3) Past treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); (4) Contraindications to rTMS (previous severe head trauma or neurosurgical intervention, past or current epilepsy, active brain tumor, intracranial hypertension, implanted ferromagnetic devices, e.g., cardiac pacemaker, neurostimulator, or cochlear implants); (5) other type of pain more severe than neuropathic pain; (6) Any difficulty to fill out questionnaires (due to language or cognitive problems); (7) impossibility to be followed during the time course of the study;

Treatment and study plan

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Device

Participants received 10HZ rTMS protocol consisted of 5 sessions over 5 consecutive workdays

Sham stimulation

Device

Participants received Sham rTMS stimulations consisted of 5 sessions over 5 consecutive workdays

Primary outcomes

  1. The mean change from baseline in pain intensity measured with the visual-analogic scale (VAS)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months

    The primary outcome measure was the mean change from baseline over the course of 5 (group by time interaction) in average pain intensity measured with the visual-analogic scale (VAS) ( 0= no pain and 10= maximal pain). Baseline average pain intensity was assessed at inclusion then on the day of randomization, just before the first rTMS session (day 1) and corresponded to the average of these two values.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Motor-evoked potential (MEP)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months

    Corticospinal excitability was measured with MEP at rest of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle, A total of 20 single pulses were consecutively delivered to the hand region of the left M1 at 120% RMT (45° to the midline, handle pointing backward).

  2. Cortical silent period (CSP)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months

    Corticospinal excitability was measured with CSP during a sustained voluntary FDI muscle contraction, A total of 20 single pulses were consecutively delivered to the hand region of the left M1 at 120% RMT (45° to the midline, handle pointing backward).

  3. The sensory dimension of pain and affective dimension of pain

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months

    The sensory dimension of pain (rated on 33) and affective dimension of pain (rated on 12) from the 15-items Short form of the McGill Pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) .

  4. Pain interference scale

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months

    7 items rated from 0= does not interfere to 10= complete interference, total score 70 from the Brief Pain Inventory.

  5. Patients global impression of change

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months

    the 7 items Patients global impression of change (PGIC) (from very much worse to very much improved)

  6. The depression score

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months

    ranging from 0 to 13 with higher scores indicating more severe depression from the 13 items Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

  7. release of neurotransmitters

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 8 months

    Measured with magnetic resonance spectroscopy,MRS

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2023
First posted
Dec 23, 2021
Registry last updated
Oct 31, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.