Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01080118

Effectiveness of Video System in Improving Learning of Tracheal Intubation Using Standard Laryngoscopy Among Novices

The use of the video laryngoscope to teach laryngoscopy will improve the performance of tracheal intubation done by novices because it will allow a shared view of the airway leading to a better feedback from the trainer to the trainee.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

About this study

A group of 30 fourth year medical students and interns rotating through the department of anesthesiology will be studied. Firstly, a standard lecture will be provided in which the description and importance of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation will be explained. This will include descriptions of anatomy, relevant equipment and technique of tracheal intubation. Following the lecture , the students will be randomly allocated using sealed envelopes into two groups : a control group ( taught with a standard Macintosh Laryngoscope ) and a study group ( taught with the Airtraq video laryngoscope).Each group will receive a demonstration and verbal instruction on how to perform laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation by their instructor.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Students:

Inclusion criteria

for the medical student:

  • Medical student or intern rotating through the anesthesiology department

Exclusion criteria

for the medical student:

  • Previous attempts of laryngoscopy in humans
  • Subject who refuses participation

Patients:

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 -75 years of age
  • ASA PS I, II
  • Procedure that will require General anesthesia with tracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

  • Age < 18 years old or greater than 75 years of age
  • Patient or student who refuses participation
  • ASA Physical status class III or greater
  • History of lung disease
  • History of obstructive sleep apnea
  • History of difficult intubation
  • Evidence of possible difficult airway (Mallampati Class >2, TMH distance <6 cm, mouth opening <4 cm and limited neck mobility)
  • Unanticipated difficult laryngoscopy (defined by inability of the attending anesthesiology to intubate after 2 attempts)
  • Patients at risk for aspiration
  • Patients with BMI greater than 35
  • Pregnant patients

Treatment and study plan

Airtraq

Device

Subjects were taught with the Airtraq video laryngoscope

Control group, taught with a standard Macintosh laryngoscope

Other

Subjects were taught how to use the Mackintosh blade first

Primary outcomes

  1. Successful Endotracheal Intubation

    Time frame: 120 seconds

    A successful placement of the endotracheal tube as defined by the presence of bilateral breath sounds and positive recording of end tidal carbon dioxide.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Intubation

    Time frame: 120 seconds

    Time to intubation is the time interval of blade insertion until the removal of the laryngoscope.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Clinical Trial on the Effectiveness of Video System in Improving Learning of Tracheal Intubation Using Standard Laryngoscopy Among Novices

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Mar 3, 2010
Registry last updated
Dec 2, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.