Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 10117, Germany
NCT Number: NCT02295735
The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to test the efficacy of preventive dressings for pressure ulcer prevention.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Berlin, 10117, Germany
Patients of intensive acute care and residents of institutional long-term care facilities are at high risk for developing pressure ulcers (PUs). PU standard prevention includes repositioning, early mobilization and the use of special support surfaces. The use of prophylactic dressings might reduce friction and shear forces and/or modify the microclimate of the skin and might therefore protect the skin and underlying tissues from pressure/deformation injury. The primary objective of this study is to determine if preventive silicone dressings (Mepilex® border) applied to the heels and to the sacrum in addition to PU standard prevention reduces PU incidence category II, III, IV, and deep tissue injury compared to PU standard alone in at risk hospital patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an average of 12.6 (SD +/-12.7) days
The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of Pressure ulcer category II, III, IV, unstageable and DTI at heels or sacrum. Pressure ulcers were categorized according to the NPUAP/EPUAP 2014 classification System. The occurrence of a new pressure ulcer of any category was assessed and documented daily during the study period. The Categories are defined as follows: Category I (nonblanchable erythema); Category II (Partial thickness Skin loss); Category III (Full Thickness Skin loss); Category IV (Full Thickness tissue loss); Unstageable (Depth unknown); Deep tissue injury (suspected Deep tissue injury, Depth unknown)
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an average of 12.6 (SD +/-12.7) days
The Incidence density of Pressure Ulcer category II, III, IV, unstageable and DTI at heels or sacrum was measured. Pressure ulcer were categorized according to the NPUAP/EPUAP 2014 classification system. The occurrence of a new Pressure ulcer of any category was assessed and documented daily during the study period. The Categories are defined as follows: Category I (nonblanchable erythema); Category II (Partial thickness Skin loss); Category III (Full Thickness Skin loss); Category IV (Full Thickness tissue loss); Unstageable (Depth unknown); Deep tissue injury (suspected Deep tissue injury, Depth unknown)
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an average of 12.6 (SD +/-12.7) days
The the cumulative incidence of Pressure ulcer category I, II, III, IV, unstageable and DTI at heels or sacrum. Pressure ulcer were categorized according to the NPUAP/EPUAP 2014 classification system. The occurrence of a new Pressure ulcer of any category was assessed and documented daily during the study period. The Categories are defined as follows: Category I (nonblanchable erythema); Category II (Partial thickness Skin loss); Category III (Full Thickness Skin loss); Category IV (Full Thickness tissue loss); Unstageable (Depth unknown); Deep tissue injury (suspected Deep tissue injury, Depth unknown)
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an average of 12.6 (SD +/-12.7) days
The Incidence density of Pressure Ulcer category I, II, III, IV, unstageable and DTI at heels or sacrum was measured. Pressure ulcer were categorized according to the NPUAP/EPUAP 2014 classification system. The occurrence of a new Pressure ulcer of any category was assessed and documented daily during the study period. The Categories are defined as follows: Category I (nonblanchable erythema); Category II (Partial thickness Skin loss); Category III (Full Thickness Skin loss); Category IV (Full Thickness tissue loss); Unstageable (Depth unknown); Deep tissue injury (suspected Deep tissue injury, Depth unknown)
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an average of 12.6 (SD +/-12.7) days
Number of preventive sacrum dressings used for pressure ulcer prevention
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an average of 12.6 (SD +/-12.7) days
Support surface categories were recorded. Please see the different types in the Outcome measure data table
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an average of 12.6 (SD +/-12.7) days
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an average of 12.6 (SD +/-12.7) days
Number of preventive heel dressings used for pressure ulcer prevention
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an average of 12.6 (SD +/-12.7) days
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an average of 12.6 (SD +/-12.7) days
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an average of 12.6 (SD +/-12.7) days
Time frame: Duration of hospital stay, an average of 12.6 (SD +/-12.7) days
Follow up period of included ICU patients in mean (days)
PD Dr. Jan Kottner
Other
A Randomized Controlled Parallel-group Trial to Investigate the Effectiveness of Two Silicone Dressings for Sacral and Heel Pressure Ulcer Prevention Compared to no Dressings
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04309864
Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05729334
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Ulcer
Barcelona, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT03283787
Pressure Ulcer, Pressure Ulcer, Stage IV
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02852148
Burns, Cardiovascular Diseases
Ashington, United Kingdom
View Trial Details